- Jan 6, 2009
- 9,094
- 1,748
- 190
Why are we handing money over to nations that have openly declared their intentions to destroy this country?
Its called national suicide
It's called being sold out by our 'dear leaders'.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why are we handing money over to nations that have openly declared their intentions to destroy this country?
Its called national suicide
The proposed sum is about 1 tenth of 1 percent of the total cost to date of the iraq invasion and occupation.
As interesting a fact that is, is there a point in there somewhere?
The proposed sum is about 1 tenth of 1 percent of the total cost to date of the iraq invasion and occupation.
As interesting a fact that is, is there a point in there somewhere?
Boosh
Oh these right wingers are hilarious. For years they told us about all the freedom Bush brought to the middle east and how the people are now "free" and why it was worth the cost.
Now, they are calling Bush an "idiot". They say Obama is just as bad for staying there.
Well, I have news for them. Bush signed treaties and agreements. When a new president comes in, he can't just "magically" undo everything the previous president did. So Bush and the Republicans left Obama with a huge, steaming pile of shit. Only now, they insist it's his "shit". It's like a game of "tag" to them.
TAG! You're it!
Hilarious. Bush spent trillions and rebuilt Iraq for "free"......
But BOOOOSH did it too!!! Blah Blah Blah! To Hell with Socialist/Progressive Globalists and Neocon Globalists. They're both destroying our nation.
No had President Bush limited his spending to 1 tenth of 1 percent of what he actually spend in the invasion and occupation of Iraq we'd be in a lot better shape. Well 800 billion dollars + interest, less anyway.
Hilarious. Bush spent trillions and rebuilt Iraq for "free"......Well.....not exactly "for free"......
*
*
Oh these right wingers are hilarious. For years they told us about all the freedom Bush brought to the middle east and how the people are now "free" and why it was worth the cost.
Now, they are calling Bush an "idiot". They say Obama is just as bad for staying there.
Well, I have news for them. Bush signed treaties and agreements. When a new president comes in, he can't just "magically" undo everything the previous president did. So Bush and the Republicans left Obama with a huge, steaming pile of shit. Only now, they insist it's his "shit". It's like a game of "tag" to them.
TAG! You're it!
Nice try dipshit. I never said I believed in bringing Iraqis "freedom". I did agree with removing Saddam from power, but not using ground troops to police those people. Should of just carpet bombed them, gone in and taken the oil fields to make them pay for the way, and then got the fuck out.
So please explain, how Bush's "treaties" with Iraq have bumfuck to do with Egypt and the Muslim Brotherhood?
A billion here, a billion there...
This President scares the crap out of me sometimes.
What the fuck is he up to now?
Hilarious. Bush spent trillions and rebuilt Iraq for "free" and Republicans are complaining about Obama keeping the Middle East from slipping into chaos after they completely fucked it up. I'm talking "hilarious".
Neither should have spent a dime on either, it was wrong under Bush and it is wrong now. We have other uses for the money, like buying down the debt. Would you agree?
hilarious. Bush spent trillions and rebuilt iraq for "free"......well.....not exactly "for free"......
*
*
republicans don't care about the "average" american. As far as they are concerned, the cost of a few americans is as close to "free" as you can get.
As he uses Class Warfare tactics.Because he's a nincompoop.Huh? why?
That and his budget proposal isn't serious...He's setting up the "do-nothing congress" strawman to run against.
Lest we forget Wilson, FDR and Truman.well.....not exactly "for free"......
*
*
republicans don't care about the "average" american. As far as they are concerned, the cost of a few americans is as close to "free" as you can get.
lbj?
Hilarious. Bush spent trillions and rebuilt Iraq for "free"......Well.....not exactly "for free"......
*
*
Oh these right wingers are hilarious. For years they told us about all the freedom Bush brought to the middle east and how the people are now "free" and why it was worth the cost.
Now, they are calling Bush an "idiot". They say Obama is just as bad for staying there.
Well, I have news for them. Bush signed treaties and agreements. When a new president comes in, he can't just "magically" undo everything the previous president did. So Bush and the Republicans left Obama with a huge, steaming pile of shit. Only now, they insist it's his "shit". It's like a game of "tag" to them.
TAG! You're it!
Nice try dipshit. I never said I believed in bringing Iraqis "freedom". I did agree with removing Saddam from power, but not using ground troops to police those people. Should of just carpet bombed them, gone in and taken the oil fields to make them pay for the way, and then got the fuck out.
So please explain, how Bush's "treaties" with Iraq have bumfuck to do with Egypt and the Muslim Brotherhood?
I'm afraid to ask. What "way"? What does that even mean?