- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #321
Absolutely rebutted in 320.The neo-corporatists have lost out.
Thank God. Read #315 above. If you can't rebut it, shut it.
Read 317 above. If you can't rebut it, shut it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Absolutely rebutted in 320.The neo-corporatists have lost out.
Thank God. Read #315 above. If you can't rebut it, shut it.
Read 317 above. If you can't rebut it, shut it.
In my instance, it's the food service industry.Then, as long as you employ less than 50 people, none of this should apply to you.But nothing is stopping you from doing that right now, is it?
If you want to slash someone's wages, you can do it whether they qualify for OT or not
Funny how you use the word slash when you don't even know the pay rates.
Oh but then again you think a smaller than planned increase is a cut so .
You obviously realize that if new overtime regulations were to take effect that you could slash your workers pay and there is probably nothing they can do about it in the current job market
So, why don't you just cut what you pay your employees now?
They obviously have little recourse. If they don't like it...leave
I am talking about a salaried position NOT all hourly positions since the overtime laws for hourly positions have not changed.
I do not authorize any of my hourly employees to work any overtime.
I don't know how many times I have to say it but here we go again.
The reasoning behind a salaried position is that a person given more responsibility than an hourly employee gets a higher salary than he would if he remained hourly with the agreement that he may have to work more than 40 hours. Salaried positions often have better benefits as well (at least mine do such as a better 401 package and 50% paid disability insurance)
I expect my salaried asst mgr to put in anywhere from 42 to 48 hours in a given week.
If you add it all up the benefits that go along with the salaried position outweigh the loss of overtime pay
Now I can't do both the extra benefits AND the overtime so the fucking government is making the choice not the employee.
And you see nothing wrong with that.
Because, as I understand it, the salary threshold for OT is suggested to be 50 or 55.
Bigger companies, with more than 50 employees, are abusing their salary managers.
They keep the hourly employees under 28 to avoid ACA and pile the extra burden on their management
Who are they?
Sorry but sweeping generalizations are meaningless.
Not every company with 50 employees is doing this.
While wehortysir, very good. It is time for government to regulate the labor field more stringently for workers' safety and wages and salaries. Business has crossed the line, yet again.
May agree on this OT issue, it wouldn't be an issue if not for the ACAWhile wehortysir, very good. It is time for government to regulate the labor field more stringently for workers' safety and wages and salaries. Business has crossed the line, yet again.
Overtime is a made up concept.
This is something that was long overdue.
Obama plans to expand overtime eligibility for millions of workers - Yahoo News
Another dumb socialist idea
-Geaux
People need to make a living too. Especially if they work for it.
The private sector has added 12.8 million jobs over 64 straight months of job growth, extending the longest streak on record. Today we learned that total nonfarm employment rose by 223,000 in June—and all those jobs came from the private sector. Although total job growth was revised down somewhat in April and May, much of the revision is attributable to lower government employment than previously estimated. On the whole, our economy has added 2.9 million new jobs over the past twelve months, near the fifteen-year high achieved in February.
No most Millennials are children.They are not childrenthe proposal would more than double the maximum income a salaried worker can earn and still be eligible for overtime pay to $50,440, or $970 a week. The current threshold is $23,660.
Once again management has been abusing the rules and claiming that those that earn $23,661 are "managers" an ineligible for overtime
Well, just the hell why not? Obama calls 26 year old men and women. 'children'
-Geaux
Obamacare was once again having to compensate for abusive employer practices of hiring young employees as "temps" with no benefits
If employers were offering full healthcare to new employees, he would not have had to do that
How many times you been fired? My guess is at least Six times and unemployed right now, or you are just a keyboard commando, working at ArbysWell if someone works more than 40 hrs and they dont get paid for that, how is that fair to the employee? Any employer that is even half way decent pays for overtime as long as they continue to ask the employee, they should pay. The days of the employee giving everything for the employee are over, long gone. Its a dog eat dog world and country we have now. You want me to work, you pay. I'm not there for the owner, I'm there for me, and me only. You pretend to pay me, I pretend to work.
most people pretend to work, regardless of their pay scale. That's just the way most people ARE. At least, in the US. Our work ethic is almost completely gone.