docmauser1
Gold Member
- Oct 8, 2010
- 7,274
- 698
- 190
When haven't palistanians started any war?Where did you ever get the idea that the Palestinians started the war?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When haven't palistanians started any war?Where did you ever get the idea that the Palestinians started the war?
edthecynic about that map you have been posting
The map that lies - and one that doesn't
While I presume that the white sections are indeed the land that was privately owned by Jews, the land in green was not privately owned by Arabs.
Only a tiny percentage of land in Palestine was privately owned. The various categories of land ownership included:
Mulk: privately owned in the Western sense.
Miri: Land owned by the government (originally the Ottoman crown) and suitable for agricultural use. Individuals could purchase a deed to cultivate this land and pay a tithe to the government. Ownership could be transferred only with the approval of the state. Miri rights could be transferred to heirs, and the land could be sub-let to tenants. If the owner died without an heir or the land was not cultivated for three years, the land would revert to the state.
Mahlul: Uncultivated Miri lands that would revert to the state, in theory after three years.
Mawat (or Mewat): So-called dead, unreclaimed land. It constituted about 50 to 60% of the land in Palestine. It belonged to the government. ...If the land had been cultivated with permission, it would be registered, at least under the Mandate, free of charge.
Elder of Ziyon: The map that lies - and one that doesn't
Indeed, they couldn't - palistanians, as we know, popped up out of the blue in about 1967, and Yassir Arafat didn't have a time machine.Where did you get that? It is obviously false. Did the Palestinians go to Europe to attack the Zionists?
Indeed, they couldn't - palistanians, as we know, popped up out of the blue in about 1967, and Yassir Arafat didn't have a time machine.Where did you get that? It is obviously false. Did the Palestinians go to Europe to attack the Zionists?
Where did you get that? It is obviously false.
Did the Palestinians go to Europe to attack the Zionists?
Like I said it was not Israel that started the war.
USATODAY.com - The Arab-Israeli conflict, 1947-present
Neighboring Arab nations, including Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Egypt and then-Transjordan, lend support to the Palestinians.
Palestine was under attack from Israel and the other countries came to their defense.
edthecynic about that map you have been posting
The map that lies - and one that doesn't
While I presume that the white sections are indeed the land that was privately owned by Jews, the land in green was not privately owned by Arabs.
Only a tiny percentage of land in Palestine was privately owned. The various categories of land ownership included:
Mulk: privately owned in the Western sense.
Miri: Land owned by the government (originally the Ottoman crown) and suitable for agricultural use. Individuals could purchase a deed to cultivate this land and pay a tithe to the government. Ownership could be transferred only with the approval of the state. Miri rights could be transferred to heirs, and the land could be sub-let to tenants. If the owner died without an heir or the land was not cultivated for three years, the land would revert to the state.
Mahlul: Uncultivated Miri lands that would revert to the state, in theory after three years.
Mawat (or Mewat): So-called dead, unreclaimed land. It constituted about 50 to 60% of the land in Palestine. It belonged to the government. ...If the land had been cultivated with permission, it would be registered, at least under the Mandate, free of charge.
Elder of Ziyon: The map that lies - and one that doesn't
The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.
State of Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Indeed, they couldn't - palistanians, as we know, popped up out of the blue in about 1967, and Yassir Arafat didn't have a time machine.Where did you get that? It is obviously false. Did the Palestinians go to Europe to attack the Zionists?
There were Palestinian groups in the 1950s who got together in 1964 to form the Palestine Liberation Organization. (PLO)
You believe too much propaganda.
edthecynic about that map you have been posting
The map that lies - and one that doesn't
While I presume that the white sections are indeed the land that was privately owned by Jews, the land in green was not privately owned by Arabs.
Only a tiny percentage of land in Palestine was privately owned. The various categories of land ownership included:
Mulk: privately owned in the Western sense.
Miri: Land owned by the government (originally the Ottoman crown) and suitable for agricultural use. Individuals could purchase a deed to cultivate this land and pay a tithe to the government. Ownership could be transferred only with the approval of the state. Miri rights could be transferred to heirs, and the land could be sub-let to tenants. If the owner died without an heir or the land was not cultivated for three years, the land would revert to the state.
Mahlul: Uncultivated Miri lands that would revert to the state, in theory after three years.
Mawat (or Mewat): So-called dead, unreclaimed land. It constituted about 50 to 60% of the land in Palestine. It belonged to the government. ...If the land had been cultivated with permission, it would be registered, at least under the Mandate, free of charge.
Elder of Ziyon: The map that lies - and one that doesn't
The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.
State of Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wrong, wrong and wrong.
Oh, who was that shakh, sultan, vazeer maybe, president of that alleged "palestine"?Palestine was under attack from Israel and the other countries came to their defense.
Like I said it was not Israel that started the war.
USATODAY.com - The Arab-Israeli conflict, 1947-present
Neighboring Arab nations, including Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Egypt and then-Transjordan, lend support to the Palestinians.
Palestine was under attack from Israel and the other countries came to their defense.
You are a fucking liar.
The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.
State of Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wrong, wrong and wrong.
It also required Germany to recognize the disposition of the former Ottoman territories and to recognize the new states laid down within their boundaries. The Treaty of Lausanne required the newly created states that acquired the territory to pay annuities on the Ottoman public debt, and to assume responsibility for the administration of concessions that had been granted by the Ottomans. A dispute regarding the status of the territories was settled by an Arbitrator appointed by the Council of the League of Nations. It was decided that Palestine and Transjordan were newly created states according to the terms of the applicable post-war treaties. In its Judgment No. 5, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, the Permanent Court of International Justice also decided that Palestine was responsible as the successor state for concessions granted by Ottoman authorities.
Palestine was under attack from Israel and the other countries came to their defense.
You are a fucking liar.
The Palestinians went to Europe and attacked the Zionists?
Are we claiming that, finally, hashisheen formed the PLO?There were Palestinian groups in the 1950s who got together in 1964 to form the Palestine Liberation Organization. (PLO).Indeed, they couldn't - palistanians, as we know, popped up out of the blue in about 1967, and Yassir Arafat didn't have a time machine.Where did you get that? It is obviously false. Did the Palestinians go to Europe to attack the Zionists?
Let's be factual and, therefore, mention that, that crappy "meeting" took place on October 1, 1948, while the war, that our dear arabs started, took place May 1948 - July 1949.The All-Palestine Government was under the nominal leadership of Amin al-Husayni, the Mufti of Jerusalem. Ahmed Hilmi Abd al-Baqi was named Prime Minister. A Palestinian National Council was convened in Gaza on 30 September 1948, under the chairmanship of Amin al-Husayni. The council passed a series of resolutions culminating on 1 October 1948 with a declaration of independence over the whole of Palestine, with Jerusalem as its capital.
It has been noted by the more rational that what Obama stated has been the foundation of US diplomacy towards the Palestinian/Israeli situation for some time now....all Obama did was to OFFICIALLY offer it as POLICY.
And the President was quite careful to state this would entail NEGOTIATIONS...NOT just re-establishment of old border lines.
he wasn't very careful when he demanded Israel stop settlements before negotiations, was he?
What a piece of work, if I where Isreal I would throw up the big F.U. sign and carry on with my business. We will make relations better with Isreal after 2012 is over with. This president is embarrassing.
And what might those previous agreements be?Given that those "settlements" were essentially in violations of previous agreements,... .
Putting it very mildly, of course.This president is embarrassing.
When hasn't that "palistanian issue" been one big farce?The whole story is a farce, by the way.
Don't think so. Obama (and his family) is a child, who got an all-free vacation in Harrods. He hates everyone, reminding him of that.He is very fond of his masters.
China is the problem, as they own America.Israel is the problem, as they own America.
What a piece of work, if I where Isreal I would throw up the big F.U. sign and carry on with my business. We will make relations better with Isreal after 2012 is over with. This president is embarrassing.
This president is embarrassing. The whole story is a farce, by the way. He is very fond of his masters. Israel is the problem, as they own America.
CON$ just can't handle the truth. No matter how many times you expose their CON$ervative sources as the pathological liars they are, CON$ still accuse anyone who exposes them to the truth as a liar.Except, as I have already posted the videos in this thread, NaziYahoo brags that it was HE who broke the Oslo accords!!!!!!!!!The Middle East Mindset Whats It All About
Forgotten are UN Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338, both passed in the wake of the Six-Day War (1967) and the Yom Kippur War (1973). These Resolutions acknowledged Israels need for secure and recognized boundaries prior to any Israeli withdrawals. They now appear, however, to be irrelevant, raising the question: Why should Israel honor its international commitments with the Palestinians (such as those enshrined in the Oslo Accords) if international commitments made with Israel by the Palestinians are not honored as well?
The Middle East Mindset Whats It All About | IsraelSeen.com
horseshit you fuckng liar if you posed a vieo it's probuly from some arab propaganda bullshit.