Obama is building concentration camps for all the illegal aliens he is letting in

Those camps are FEMA camps and not for illegal immigrants.

They are for the far right disaffected American citizens.
 
Those camps are FEMA camps and not for illegal immigrants.

They are for the far right disaffected American citizens.
Must you always post foolishness?

We all know you find nothing wrong in anything Big Ears does, but must you remind us constantly?
 
We should knock the dust off the Japanese internment camps in the Mojave. Time to start rounding up Muslims and wetbacks. No judge or jury required as the law of the land has failed us

-Geaux
 
We should knock the dust off the Japanese internment camps in the Mojave. Time to start rounding up Muslims and wetbacks. No judge or jury required as the law of the land has failed us

-Geaux

Here's something you will appreciate:

The most controversial provisions to receive wide attention were contained in subsections 1021–1022 of Title X, Subtitle D, entitled "Counter-Terrorism", authorizing the indefinite military detention of persons the government suspects of involvement in terrorism, including U.S. citizens arrested on American soil. Although the White House[12] and Senate sponsors[13] maintain that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) already grants presidential authority for indefinite detention, the Act states that Congress "affirms" this authority and makes specific provisions as to the exercise of that authority.[14][15] The detention provisions of the Act have received critical attention by, among others, theAmerican Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, and some media sources which are concerned about the scope of the President's authority, including contentions that those whom they claim may be held indefinitely could include U.S. citizens arrested on American soil, including arrests by members of the Armed Forces.[16][17][18][19][20] The detention powers currently face legal challenge.

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Another garbage story put out by the garbage site Breitbart. Their expertise is misinformation and RW propaganda.
 
Another garbage story put out by the garbage site Breitbart. Their expertise is misinformation and RW propaganda.
How do you know the reporting is not true? What sources do you have backing your assertion?
 
Another garbage story put out by the garbage site Breitbart. Their expertise is misinformation and RW propaganda.
How do you know the reporting is not true? What sources do you have backing your assertion?
Viable news sources have certain journalistic standards that are not followed by Breitbart. Even if the source is hopelessly slanted to the right or left, those standards force them to use those minimum standards.
This is a typical Breitbart misinformation piece. The title and beginning of the story are giving the story they want to misinform the public about, but if you read on and analyze what is really being said you see the propaganda purpose plainly. The "small city" in the title is indeed small. About 500 children will be at a facility designed and operated as a camp. The camp has two staff members for each child and the group will only be there for a three week period. That doesn't sound like a concentration camp and Breitbart is making a tempory holding facility sound like a small town in being created.
 
Another garbage story put out by the garbage site Breitbart. Their expertise is misinformation and RW propaganda.
How do you know the reporting is not true? What sources do you have backing your assertion?
Viable news sources have certain journalistic standards that are not followed by Breitbart. Even if the source is hopelessly slanted to the right or left, those standards force them to use those minimum standards.
This is a typical Breitbart misinformation piece. The title and beginning of the story are giving the story they want to misinform the public about, but if you read on and analyze what is really being said you see the propaganda purpose plainly. The "small city" in the title is indeed small. About 500 children will be at a facility designed and operated as a camp. The camp has two staff members for each child and the group will only be there for a three week period. That doesn't sound like a concentration camp and Breitbart is making a tempory holding facility sound like a small town in being created.
Could you name a few news sources you consider viable?

Do you any sources that refute this story?
 
Another garbage story put out by the garbage site Breitbart. Their expertise is misinformation and RW propaganda.
How do you know the reporting is not true? What sources do you have backing your assertion?
Viable news sources have certain journalistic standards that are not followed by Breitbart. Even if the source is hopelessly slanted to the right or left, those standards force them to use those minimum standards.
This is a typical Breitbart misinformation piece. The title and beginning of the story are giving the story they want to misinform the public about, but if you read on and analyze what is really being said you see the propaganda purpose plainly. The "small city" in the title is indeed small. About 500 children will be at a facility designed and operated as a camp. The camp has two staff members for each child and the group will only be there for a three week period. That doesn't sound like a concentration camp and Breitbart is making a tempory holding facility sound like a small town in being created.
Could you name a few news sources you consider viable?

Do you any sources that refute this story?
With the caveat that all sources can be spotty, whether liberal or conservative when it comes to viability and reliability, I don't mind checking into conservative sources like National Review, WSJ, Business Insider, New York Post and News Max to name a few. Those seem to me to be at least worth checking into and objective reporting is found at those sources. I have found Breitbart in particular to almost always end up being sloppy and lacking journalistic standards. In other words, a waste of time.
In regards to needing another source to refute the Breitbart story in the OP, as I pointed out, the story actually refutes itself, or at least, its own title.
 

Forum List

Back
Top