Obama directly responsible for Oregon shooting

[Faun]

now you want to cry that it is a difference without a distinction. but earlier you simply tried to say it wasnt true didnt you?


man up moron

I said nothing about any distinctions. You really are fucking retarded. You prove again and again and again.

that was for your domestic partner g5000; HE KNEW who it was directed at.

too bad he's a bit more of an adult than you and knew when to admit defeat, or at least go away for a while

you're making a fool of yourself

I'm making a fool of myself by showing how retarded you are??

How does that work in your universe?

And why won't you post the numbers you said you were going to post?

 

[bedowin62]

"Obama directly responsible for Oregon shooting"

The unmitigated partisan ignorance and stupidity of this warrants pointing out again that this is in fact partisan ignorance and stupidity, as well as being wrong beyond dispute.

it's amazing you can even type words with the President's nuts resting on your chin.

 

[bedowin62]

now you want to cry that it is a difference without a distinction. but earlier you simply tried to say it wasnt true didnt you?


man up moron

I said nothing about any distinctions. You really are fucking retarded. You prove again and again and again.

that was for your domestic partner g5000; HE KNEW who it was directed at.

too bad he's a bit more of an adult than you and knew when to admit defeat, or at least go away for a while

you're making a fool of yourself

I'm making a fool of myself by showing how retarded you are??

How does that work in your universe?

And why won't you post the numbers you said you were going to post?

look up idiot. i posted them

geesh

 

[bedowin62]

107th 2001–2003 100 50 50 — — 435 212 221 2 —
108th 2003–2005 100 48 51 1 — 435 205 229 1 —
109th 2005–2007 100 44 55 1 — 435 202 231 1 1
110th 2007–2009 100 49 49 2 — 435 233 198 — 4
111th 2009–2011 100 57 41 2 2 435 256 178 — 1
112th 2011–2013 100 51 47 2 — 435 193 242 — —
113th 2013–2015 100 54 45 1 — 435 201 234 — —
114th 2015–2017 100 44 54 2 — 435 188 246 — 1

here ya go, again nutjob

enjoy!!

 

[Faun]

Why would I admit I was wrong when you were?

bedwetter: by the way from DAY ONE in 2007 the Democrat majority was BIGGER THAN ANY REPUBLICAN MAJORITY BUSH HAD

Faun: Is that true or is bedwetter just another rightarded imbecile? Let's check it out, shall we....?

Senate majority:
2001: Republican: 49/50; Democrat: 50 (control switched several times)
2003: Republican: 51
2005: Republican: 55
2007: Democrat: 49 (+2 Independents who caucused with Democrats)

Bedwetter was wrong about the Senate.

House majority:
2001: Republican: 220
2003: Republican: 229
2005: Republican: 233
2007: Democrat: 233

And bedwetter was wrong about the House.​

Reaffirming that bedwetter is a flaming moron who knows nothing about that of which he speaks. ​

... jeez, you're a glutton for embarrassment.

2003 was Bush's first term, and thus the "earlier years". 2005 was his second term.

It is true the Democrats had a larger majority in 2007 than the Republicans did in Bush's earlier years.

However, it is a difference without a distinction. Once you have 50 percent plus one, it doesn't matter how many above that figure you have until you reach the two-thirds figure.

It is not true as the numbers I showed indicate.

Republicans had 51 Senators during the 108th session of Congress -- not more than the 49 Democrats plus 2 Independents in 2007.

Republicans had 55 Senators during the 109th osession of Congress -- not more than the 49 Democrats plus 2 Independents in 2007.

Republicans had 233 House members during the 109th session of Congress -- not more than the 233 Democrats had in 2007.

who are the Independents you idiot?

isnt one running for president right now?

who does he caucus with??

youre an ignorant loser

You don't know what "plus" means, do ya, rightard?

you're couting one chamber arent you dummy?

i said Dems had a larger majority and they did

you're pathetic

loser, go cry

No, retard, I posted the numbers from both the House and the Senate.

You can't even count to two.

 

[Faun]

107th 2001–2003 100 50 50 — — 435 212 221 2 —
108th 2003–2005 100 48 51 1 — 435 205 229 1 —
109th 2005–2007 100 44 55 1 — 435 202 231 1 1
110th 2007–2009 100 49 49 2 — 435 233 198 — 4
111th 2009–2011 100 57 41 2 2 435 256 178 — 1
112th 2011–2013 100 51 47 2 — 435 193 242 — —
113th 2013–2015 100 54 45 1 — 435 201 234 — —
114th 2015–2017 100 44 54 2 — 435 188 246 — 1

here ya go, again nutjob

enjoy!!

Post a link to where you got those numbers from.... it claims there were 231 House Republicans in the 109th Congress when there were actually 233...

Party Divisions of the House of Representatives* | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives

 

[bedowin62]

Composition of Congress by Party 1855–2017
this is the website

 

[Faun]

Composition of Congress by Party 1855–2017
this is the website

Retard.

house.gov trumps infoplease.com



Now that you've been proven wrong, let's see if you're man enough to admit you're the fucking retard I say you are.....

 

[jon_berzerk]

What kind of sick fucking piece of shit are you?

So you want Feds to arrest 87,000 people because the Russians told you so...

This is not like Bush being told guys are learning how to fly and not land, how about you answer that first...

But he was a self admitted conservative and republican... Maybe Obama should just arrest them, that's a list too...

A few boys in germany in 1930s had a list too...

I don't think anyone said arrest these people, but why wouldn't you make sure they can't get access to weapons.

i guess i would not want to see anyones right to firearms be pulled

without due process

If a guy had terrorist connections, had lots of weapons and ammo, and had on-line anti-US rants would that be sufficient to step in?

then he should be charged with a crime =due process

and while that "due process" proceeds through the court system for weeks and months, the guy murders 25 americans. Sometimes we have to use common sense.

“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”Ben Franklin

 

[Faun]

Composition of Congress by Party 1855–2017
this is the website

Retard.

house.gov trumps infoplease.com



Now that you've been proven wrong, let's see if you're man enough to admit you're the fucking retard I say you are.....

Well this proves it ... bedwetter is not man enough.

 

[Skylar]

Is RedFish STILL trying to polish his turd of a conspiracy OP?

 

[boilermaker55]

And the floods and rain on the eastern seaboard and the missing of the Malaysian flight and 'the donald" being a billionaire....and the birth of your children. |
Grow up!

Read it and weep, libs and obamabots

Oregon Mass Shooter On Terror List Obama Refused To Take From Russia | EUTimes.net

 

[bedowin62]

Composition of Congress by Party 1855–2017
this is the website

Retard.

house.gov trumps infoplease.com



Now that you've been proven wrong, let's see if you're man enough to admit you're the fucking retard I say you are.....

Well this proves it ... bedwetter is not man enough.

but you didnt prove me wrong moron. that's why you're still crying what 3 or 4 days later??

 

[Faun]

Composition of Congress by Party 1855–2017
this is the website

Retard.

house.gov trumps infoplease.com



Now that you've been proven wrong, let's see if you're man enough to admit you're the fucking retard I say you are.....

Well this proves it ... bedwetter is not man enough.

but you didnt prove me wrong moron. that's why you're still crying what 3 or 4 days later??

You're delusional. Of course I proved you wrong. I posted the number of Republicans in the 109th Congress in the House (233) from house.gov and tne Senate (55) from senate.gov. Neither of which was more than Democrats had in 2007.

You've proven you're not man enough to admit you're an imbecile.

That's ok, imbecile ... everyone here can see it for themselves.

 

[bedowin62]

Composition of Congress by Party 1855–2017
this is the website

Retard.

house.gov trumps infoplease.com



Now that you've been proven wrong, let's see if you're man enough to admit you're the fucking retard I say you are.....

Well this proves it ... bedwetter is not man enough.

but you didnt prove me wrong moron. that's why you're still crying what 3 or 4 days later??

You're delusional. Of course I proved you wrong. I posted the number of Republicans in the 109th Congress in the House (233) from house.gov and tne Senate (55) from senate.gov. Neither of which was more than Democrats had in 2007.

You've proven you're not man enough to admit you're an imbecile.

That's ok, imbecile ... everyone here can see it for themselves.

you're including only one chamber from each time period you mindless idiot. in both periods there were more Democrats overall in Congress than there were Republican

THAT is why you're a loser and a laughable crybaby that nobody takes seriously

 

[bedowin62]

107th 2001–2003 100 50 50 — — 435 212 221 2 —
108th 2003–2005 100 48 51 1 — 435 205 229 1 —
109th 2005–2007 100 44 55 1 — 435 202 231 1 1
110th 2007–2009 100 49 49 2 — 435 233 198 — 4
111th 2009–2011 100 57 41 2 2 435 256 178 — 1
112th 2011–2013 100 51 47 2 — 435 193 242 — —
113th 2013–2015 100 54 45 1 — 435 201 234 — —
114th 2015–2017 100 44 54 2 — 435 188 246 — 1

again read it and weep

better yet man up and apologize

 

[Faun]

Composition of Congress by Party 1855–2017
this is the website

Retard.

house.gov trumps infoplease.com



Now that you've been proven wrong, let's see if you're man enough to admit you're the fucking retard I say you are.....

Well this proves it ... bedwetter is not man enough.

but you didnt prove me wrong moron. that's why you're still crying what 3 or 4 days later??

You're delusional. Of course I proved you wrong. I posted the number of Republicans in the 109th Congress in the House (233) from house.gov and tne Senate (55) from senate.gov. Neither of which was more than Democrats had in 2007.

You've proven you're not man enough to admit you're an imbecile.

That's ok, imbecile ... everyone here can see it for themselves.

you're including only one chamber from each time period you mindless idiot. in both periods there were more Democrats overall in Congress than there were Republican

THAT is why you're a loser and a laughable crybaby that nobody takes seriously

You're too retarded. Each chamber votes independently.

But even worse for you, you're still wrong.

2005-2007: 288 Republicans
2007-2009: 282 Democrats + 2 Independents caucusing with Democrats.

 

[bedowin62]

Retard.

house.gov trumps infoplease.com



Now that you've been proven wrong, let's see if you're man enough to admit you're the fucking retard I say you are.....

Well this proves it ... bedwetter is not man enough.

but you didnt prove me wrong moron. that's why you're still crying what 3 or 4 days later??

You're delusional. Of course I proved you wrong. I posted the number of Republicans in the 109th Congress in the House (233) from house.gov and tne Senate (55) from senate.gov. Neither of which was more than Democrats had in 2007.

You've proven you're not man enough to admit you're an imbecile.

That's ok, imbecile ... everyone here can see it for themselves.

you're including only one chamber from each time period you mindless idiot. in both periods there were more Democrats overall in Congress than there were Republican

THAT is why you're a loser and a laughable crybaby that nobody takes seriously

You're too retarded. Each chamber votes independently.

But even worse for you, you're still wrong.

2005-2007: 288 Republicans
2007-2009: 282 Democrats + 2 Independents caucusing with Democrats.

doesnt matter; individually and in general the Democrat majorities were bigger. in the 111th Congress Dems were PLUS 18 IN THE SENATE AND PLUS EIGHTY-EIGHT IN THE HOUSE; and that is FAR bigger than any Republican majority bush had

you're just not man enough to admit when you're wrong

 

[Faun]

107th 2001–2003 100 50 50 — — 435 212 221 2 —
108th 2003–2005 100 48 51 1 — 435 205 229 1 —
109th 2005–2007 100 44 55 1 — 435 202 231 1 1
110th 2007–2009 100 49 49 2 — 435 233 198 — 4
111th 2009–2011 100 57 41 2 2 435 256 178 — 1
112th 2011–2013 100 51 47 2 — 435 193 242 — —
113th 2013–2015 100 54 45 1 — 435 201 234 — —
114th 2015–2017 100 44 54 2 — 435 188 246 — 1

again read it and weep

better yet man up and apologize

You suck at math, huh? Even your numbers, which are wrong, show...

2005-2007: 286 Republicans
2007-2009: 282 Democrats + 2 Independents who caucused with Democrats.

 

[bedowin62]

111th 2009–2011 100 57 41 2 2 435 256 178 — 1

here it is. now what year did bush have anything close to this??