Obama Continues To Whoop Willard's Ass, Latest Gallup Poll: Obama +7

[Black_Label]

IDIOT

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows President Obama attracting support from 46% of voters nationwide, while Mitt Romney earns 45% of the vote. Four percent (4%) prefer some other candidate, and five percent (5%) are undecided.

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports™

Epic fail deflection attempt, not to mention rasmussen is ultra right wing propaganda, and even they have Obama up on Willard

Nice try ya fuckin liar..

Rasmussen Reports has been a pioneer in the use of automated telephone polling techniques, but many other firms still utilize their own operator-assisted technology (see methodology). Pollsters for Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton have cited our "unchallenged record for both integrity and accuracy." During Election 2008, Rasmussen Reports projected that Barack Obama would defeat John McCain by a 52% to 46% margin. Obama was 53% to 46%. In 2004, Rasmussen Reports was the only firm to project the vote totals for both candidates within half a percentage point. Learn more about the Rasmussen Reports track record over the years.

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports™

LMAO, sourcing to rasmussen themselves to claim they are not radical right wing propaganda, what a F'in joke.

Rasmussen Polls Were Biased and Inaccurate; Quinnipiac, SurveyUSA Performed Strongly - NYTimes.com

 

[DiamondDave]

Sarahgop... it was a gallup poll, a single poll, of registered voters.. others polling likely voters show it closer.. and the RCP shows it closer along with many swing states in play.. the race is still anyone's at this point
RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama
RealClearPolitics - 2012 Election Maps - Electoral Map

 

[DiamondDave]

Epic fail deflection attempt, not to mention rasmussen is ultra right wing propaganda, and even they have Obama up on Willard

Nice try ya fuckin liar..

Rasmussen Reports has been a pioneer in the use of automated telephone polling techniques, but many other firms still utilize their own operator-assisted technology (see methodology). Pollsters for Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton have cited our "unchallenged record for both integrity and accuracy." During Election 2008, Rasmussen Reports projected that Barack Obama would defeat John McCain by a 52% to 46% margin. Obama was 53% to 46%. In 2004, Rasmussen Reports was the only firm to project the vote totals for both candidates within half a percentage point. Learn more about the Rasmussen Reports track record over the years.

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports™

LMAO, sourcing to rasmussen themselves to claim they are not radical right wing propaganda, what a F'in joke.

Rasmussen Polls Were Biased and Inaccurate; Quinnipiac, SurveyUSA Performed Strongly - NYTimes.com

Yeah... a blogger and frequent KOS contributor says it, so it MUST BE TRUE

 

[Katzndogz]

Who cares ?

People ignore the 4.3 point bounce that Romney got after Ryan was named.

Obama gets a bounce (and RealClear has that already contracting), but not in swing states.

Let Flacid Lable wizz all over himself. If that makes him happy...great. He's gonna need it come November 8th.

Ryan got the smallest bounce in the polls ever, only next to Dan Quayle which is downright pathetic, but otherwise why are you lying about the bolded?

Post DNC:

Ohio, Obama +5

Florida, from Romney +1 to now Obama +4

And the monster, North Carolina went from Willard +10 to Obama +1

The RNC was a complete disaster and the DNC hit it out of the park, and the polls are showing that.

The Willard ship is sinking fast

I only looked up North Carolina, showing how wrong your stats really are.

Only the Soros paid for and liberal Public Policy Polling has obama up and that's only by 1.

Everything else has Romney up.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - North Carolina: Romney vs. Obama

The average has Romney up +3.5.

 

[Dr.Traveler]

7 points. Wow that's a big gap.

There's still time, but if you're Mitt you've got to be planning to close the gap soon if you actually want to win. Or maybe he doesn't? I've been wondering for a while if Mitt has some sort of Brewster's Millions thing going on.

 

[Avatar4321]

A vote for Obama is a vote for terror.

A vote for Willard is a vote for those that hate the founding fathers and love fascist tyranny.

Sure. we love tyranny so we are going to vote against a tyrant.

 

[SniperFire]

Since the DOJ is terrorizing Gallup now, they will be oversampling Democrats from here on out.

 

[Black_Label]

Who cares ?

People ignore the 4.3 point bounce that Romney got after Ryan was named.

Obama gets a bounce (and RealClear has that already contracting), but not in swing states.

Let Flacid Lable wizz all over himself. If that makes him happy...great. He's gonna need it come November 8th.

Ryan got the smallest bounce in the polls ever, only next to Dan Quayle which is downright pathetic, but otherwise why are you lying about the bolded?

Post DNC:

Ohio, Obama +5

Florida, from Romney +1 to now Obama +4

And the monster, North Carolina went from Willard +10 to Obama +1

The RNC was a complete disaster and the DNC hit it out of the park, and the polls are showing that.

The Willard ship is sinking fast

I only looked up North Carolina, showing how wrong your stats really are.

Only the Soros paid for and liberal Public Policy Polling has obama up and that's only by 1.

Everything else has Romney up.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - North Carolina: Romney vs. Obama

The average has Romney up +3.5.

Article #5 on how to be a right winger. When proof is provided that your beloved GOP goons are losing, deflect in any way you can and spin it into your goon is actually winning.

 

[DiamondDave]

Who cares ?

People ignore the 4.3 point bounce that Romney got after Ryan was named.

Obama gets a bounce (and RealClear has that already contracting), but not in swing states.

Let Flacid Lable wizz all over himself. If that makes him happy...great. He's gonna need it come November 8th.

Ryan got the smallest bounce in the polls ever, only next to Dan Quayle which is downright pathetic, but otherwise why are you lying about the bolded?

Post DNC:

Ohio, Obama +5

Florida, from Romney +1 to now Obama +4

And the monster, North Carolina went from Willard +10 to Obama +1

The RNC was a complete disaster and the DNC hit it out of the park, and the polls are showing that.

The Willard ship is sinking fast

I only looked up North Carolina, showing how wrong your stats really are.

Only the Soros paid for and liberal Public Policy Polling has obama up and that's only by 1.

Everything else has Romney up.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - North Carolina: Romney vs. Obama

The average has Romney up +3.5.

Of course the little fucker lies.. it is his schtick...

He will post anything that favors Obama, no matter what, as truth

Meanwhile, many of the rest of us know that small sample polls really don't mean anything more than news or entertainment... and that a more widespread view factoring all the polls shows the race much closer.. it is fairly clear that this is a close race.. and for anyone on either side to say otherwise is frankly stupid

 

[Newby]

Says it's based on 'registered voters' yet fails to reveal out of the total registered voters, how many were D's and how many were R's and how many were I's... funny that. Unless I missed it on there somewhere?

 

[Black_Label]

7 points. Wow that's a big gap.

There's still time, but if you're Mitt you've got to be planning to close the gap soon if you actually want to win. Or maybe he doesn't? I've been wondering for a while if Mitt has some sort of Brewster's Millions thing going on.

+7 is a massive blow to Willard. Gallup's last poll was Obama +5 so it shows he's still gaining, and every pollster has him up by big numbers. Hell even the hard right rasmussen has him up.

The success of the DNC and the failure of the RNC was a vicious right hook that landed right on Willard's chin, and he's up again the ropes now.
It would have to take the most epic meltdown in political history for Obama not to win.

 

[Leweman]

And when Obama loses in November what does this poll mean?

 

[Newby]

Read it and weep... they're all doing it..

About that CNN poll … « Hot Air

About that CNN poll …

April 17, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Allahpundit wrote a lengthy piece about last night’s CNN poll, complete with some insightful commentary about the cross-tabs. If you missed it — and by the number of comments on the post, it doesn’t appear than many of you have — be sure to read it now. However, the sample data, as AP pointed out, lacked a few details, most prominent of which was the partisan split of the sampling. Given the inclination of media polls to use wildly unrepresentative D/R/I splits in their samples, the lack of transparency on that point is telling.
That might not be the biggest problem with the poll, though. Its biggest problem is … math. Reader Raymond O did some math and asked a rather interesting set of questions in an e-mail last night about how CNN did theirs. First, let’s start with the topline results, as reported by CNN: Obama 52%, Romney 43% among registered voters, 53/41 among all respondents. If that’s the case, then the number of respondents in the latter case voting for Obama should be 538, and the number supporting Romney 416.
However, when reading the questions on page 3 of the poll report, that’s not at all what we see:
BASED ON 484 RESPONDENTS WHO PLAN TO VOTE FOR OBAMA — SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 4.5 PERCENTAGE PTS.
3. (Asked of Obama voters) Is that more a vote FOR Barack Obama or more a vote AGAINST Mitt
Romney? …
BASED ON 476 RESPONDENTS WHO PLAN TO VOTE FOR ROMNEY — SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 4.5 PERCENTAGE PTS.
4. (Asked of Romney voters) Is that more a vote FOR Mitt Romney or more a vote AGAINST Barack
Obama?

 

[Black_Label]

And when Obama loses in November what does this poll mean?

Trick question, because he won't

It's really surprising to me how the right wingers think Willard is going to easily win, when his own party doesn't even like him.

 

[Black_Label]

Read it and weep... they're all doing it..

About that CNN poll … « Hot Air

About that CNN poll …

April 17, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Allahpundit wrote a lengthy piece about last night’s CNN poll, complete with some insightful commentary about the cross-tabs. If you missed it — and by the number of comments on the post, it doesn’t appear than many of you have — be sure to read it now. However, the sample data, as AP pointed out, lacked a few details, most prominent of which was the partisan split of the sampling. Given the inclination of media polls to use wildly unrepresentative D/R/I splits in their samples, the lack of transparency on that point is telling.
That might not be the biggest problem with the poll, though. Its biggest problem is … math. Reader Raymond O did some math and asked a rather interesting set of questions in an e-mail last night about how CNN did theirs. First, let’s start with the topline results, as reported by CNN: Obama 52%, Romney 43% among registered voters, 53/41 among all respondents. If that’s the case, then the number of respondents in the latter case voting for Obama should be 538, and the number supporting Romney 416.
However, when reading the questions on page 3 of the poll report, that’s not at all what we see:
BASED ON 484 RESPONDENTS WHO PLAN TO VOTE FOR OBAMA — SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 4.5 PERCENTAGE PTS.
3. (Asked of Obama voters) Is that more a vote FOR Barack Obama or more a vote AGAINST Mitt
Romney? …
BASED ON 476 RESPONDENTS WHO PLAN TO VOTE FOR ROMNEY — SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 4.5 PERCENTAGE PTS.
4. (Asked of Romney voters) Is that more a vote FOR Mitt Romney or more a vote AGAINST Barack
Obama?

Hot air is Malkin's radical right wing propaganda site, try again with something unbiased. Not to mention they are cry-babying about a CNN poll, this one is from Gallup.

 

[Avatar4321]

And when Obama loses in November what does this poll mean?

That the RNC somehow cheated. Clearly this poll is more accurate than the actual results. Ask Kerrywonohio. He would tell you.

 

[Avatar4321]

And when Obama loses in November what does this poll mean?

Trick question, because he won't

It's really surprising to me how the right wingers think Willard is going to easily win, when his own party doesn't even like him.

And yet we nominated him. We must surely hate him alot.

 

[DiamondDave]

Read it and weep... they're all doing it..

About that CNN poll … « Hot Air

About that CNN poll …

April 17, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Allahpundit wrote a lengthy piece about last night’s CNN poll, complete with some insightful commentary about the cross-tabs. If you missed it — and by the number of comments on the post, it doesn’t appear than many of you have — be sure to read it now. However, the sample data, as AP pointed out, lacked a few details, most prominent of which was the partisan split of the sampling. Given the inclination of media polls to use wildly unrepresentative D/R/I splits in their samples, the lack of transparency on that point is telling.
That might not be the biggest problem with the poll, though. Its biggest problem is … math. Reader Raymond O did some math and asked a rather interesting set of questions in an e-mail last night about how CNN did theirs. First, let’s start with the topline results, as reported by CNN: Obama 52%, Romney 43% among registered voters, 53/41 among all respondents. If that’s the case, then the number of respondents in the latter case voting for Obama should be 538, and the number supporting Romney 416.
However, when reading the questions on page 3 of the poll report, that’s not at all what we see:
BASED ON 484 RESPONDENTS WHO PLAN TO VOTE FOR OBAMA — SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 4.5 PERCENTAGE PTS.
3. (Asked of Obama voters) Is that more a vote FOR Barack Obama or more a vote AGAINST Mitt
Romney? …
BASED ON 476 RESPONDENTS WHO PLAN TO VOTE FOR ROMNEY — SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 4.5 PERCENTAGE PTS.
4. (Asked of Romney voters) Is that more a vote FOR Mitt Romney or more a vote AGAINST Barack
Obama?

Hot air is Malkin's radical right wing propaganda site, try again with something unbiased.

And your article link was to a piece by an author who is a KOS contributing little progressive propaganda weenie... you have no ground to stand on

 

[Black_Label]

And when Obama loses in November what does this poll mean?

Trick question, because he won't

It's really surprising to me how the right wingers think Willard is going to easily win, when his own party doesn't even like him.

And yet we nominated him. We must surely hate him alot.

The GOP just gave up and accepted Willard as he was the least amount of an idiot in a group of some of the most laughable candidates ever.

The GOP primaries were the biggest clown show likely in US history with everyone from Cain to Perry, to Santorum to Newt taking the lead because of the "anyone but Romney" vote.

 

[Black_Label]

Read it and weep... they're all doing it..

About that CNN poll … « Hot Air

Hot air is Malkin's radical right wing propaganda site, try again with something unbiased.

And your article link was to a piece by an author who is a KOS contributing little progressive propaganda weenie... you have no ground to stand on

What is wrong with you? My link is to Gallup