Obama and the Constitution

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,898
60,271
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. Although Obama claims to be a constitutional scholar, he has never published a single scholarly article or book, although he was a lecturer at the University of Chicago. He subscribes to the Progressive liberal view that the Constitution “ is not a static but rather a living document, and must be read in the context of an ever changing world.” Got a problem with the Constitution? - USATODAY.com


2. He did not teach, and seems to have no knowledge of the structural aspects of the Constitution, such as the separation of powers, or of the nature of executive power.

a. Obama taught the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the liberal’s favorite clause, and the pretext for many of the radical Supreme Court rulings of the Warren Court era. Barack Obama, Constitutional Ignoramus | Power Line

b. The other courses he taught were “Racism and the Law” and voting rights. Politics | Kagan: From a mock Supreme Court to the real thing | Seattle Times Newspaper



3. “In a Sept. 6, 2001, interview with Chicago Public Radio station WBEZ-FM, Mr. Obama noted that the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren "never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society," and "to that extent as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical." He also noted that the Court "didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it has been interpreted." That is to say, he noted that the U.S. Constitution as written is only a guarantee of negative liberties from government -- and not an entitlement to a right to welfare or economic justice.” Obama's 'Redistribution' Constitution - WSJ.com

a. Those ‘constraints’ include protections of private property, and individual liberty. Based on this, how can Mr. Obama live up to the oath of President: to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution"?



4. At a March 30, 2007, campaign fundraiser, then-candidate Barack Obama stated "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president, I actually respect the Constitution."

a. Of course, he immediately continued the practice of ‘signing statements.” Remember this: “ We’re not going to use signing statements as a way of doing an end run around Congress.” Obama to add signing statement to defense authorization opposing McCain-Levin amendment « Hot Air

b. Then, afraid of the court's view of ObamaCare: "I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress. And I'd just remind conservative commentators that for years what we've heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint."

c. “Seriously, Mr. President? The Supreme Court (or, as he's referred to them, "an unelected group of people") doesn't have the authority to strike down acts of Congress that violate the Constitution? For a supposed former "constitutional law professor," these statements betray a shocking level of ignorance about the concept of judicial review and the 1803 case, Marbury v. Madison, that enshrined it in American jurisprudence.” Legally Speaking: President Obama, time for a refresher course on Constitutional Law" | Southeast Texas Record

d. In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal…. As the Internet meme goes these days: FAIL! Uh, uh, uh, — that “notion” was enshrined in our Declaration of Independence, third paragraph, first sentence. One would think that this alleged professor of “Constitutional Law” at the University of Chicago Law School would have noticed such a simple, yet substantial, error.” Texas Insider » State of the Union: Obama v. Constitution



5. In a way, Mr.Obama has done the nation a great favor by reviving public interest in the Constitution, and specifically the clauses, spelling out the “few and defined” powers, as James Madison put it, of the federal government. And that is what the Tea Party movement is about!

a. The election of 2012 could mark the end of a Progressive century,- from Woodrow Wilson, 1912- and a return to an older, sounder constitutional order. It is a reminder that the Constitution begins “We the people…”

Above from "The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Presidents," Steven Hayward



So, the resume of the President with the thinnest record of achievement of any modern President, got even thinner.

November....the choice is clear.
 
1. Although Obama claims to be a constitutional scholar, he has never published a single scholarly article or book, although he was a lecturer at the University of Chicago. He subscribes to the Progressive liberal view that the Constitution “ is not a static but rather a living document, and must be read in the context of an ever changing world.” Got a problem with the Constitution? - USATODAY.com


2. He did not teach, and seems to have no knowledge of the structural aspects of the Constitution, such as the separation of powers, or of the nature of executive power.

a. Obama taught the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the liberal’s favorite clause, and the pretext for many of the radical Supreme Court rulings of the Warren Court era. Barack Obama, Constitutional Ignoramus | Power Line

b. The other courses he taught were “Racism and the Law” and voting rights. Politics | Kagan: From a mock Supreme Court to the real thing | Seattle Times Newspaper



3. “In a Sept. 6, 2001, interview with Chicago Public Radio station WBEZ-FM, Mr. Obama noted that the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren "never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society," and "to that extent as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical." He also noted that the Court "didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it has been interpreted." That is to say, he noted that the U.S. Constitution as written is only a guarantee of negative liberties from government -- and not an entitlement to a right to welfare or economic justice.” Obama's 'Redistribution' Constitution - WSJ.com

a. Those ‘constraints’ include protections of private property, and individual liberty. Based on this, how can Mr. Obama live up to the oath of President: to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution"?



4. At a March 30, 2007, campaign fundraiser, then-candidate Barack Obama stated "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president, I actually respect the Constitution."

a. Of course, he immediately continued the practice of ‘signing statements.” Remember this: “ We’re not going to use signing statements as a way of doing an end run around Congress.” Obama to add signing statement to defense authorization opposing McCain-Levin amendment « Hot Air

b. Then, afraid of the court's view of ObamaCare: "I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress. And I'd just remind conservative commentators that for years what we've heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint."

c. “Seriously, Mr. President? The Supreme Court (or, as he's referred to them, "an unelected group of people") doesn't have the authority to strike down acts of Congress that violate the Constitution? For a supposed former "constitutional law professor," these statements betray a shocking level of ignorance about the concept of judicial review and the 1803 case, Marbury v. Madison, that enshrined it in American jurisprudence.” Legally Speaking: President Obama, time for a refresher course on Constitutional Law" | Southeast Texas Record

d. In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal…. As the Internet meme goes these days: FAIL! Uh, uh, uh, — that “notion” was enshrined in our Declaration of Independence, third paragraph, first sentence. One would think that this alleged professor of “Constitutional Law” at the University of Chicago Law School would have noticed such a simple, yet substantial, error.” Texas Insider » State of the Union: Obama v. Constitution



5. In a way, Mr.Obama has done the nation a great favor by reviving public interest in the Constitution, and specifically the clauses, spelling out the “few and defined” powers, as James Madison put it, of the federal government. And that is what the Tea Party movement is about!

a. The election of 2012 could mark the end of a Progressive century,- from Woodrow Wilson, 1912- and a return to an older, sounder constitutional order. It is a reminder that the Constitution begins “We the people…”

Above from "The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Presidents," Steven Hayward



So, the resume of the President with the thinnest record of achievement of any modern President, got even thinner.

November....the choice is clear.

Why am I not surprised.....
 
Because you are a hack?

TRANSLATION:

chris%20crocker.jpg


"Leave Obama ALONE!!"
 
1. Although Obama claims to be a constitutional scholar, he has never published a single scholarly article or book, although he was a lecturer at the University of Chicago. He subscribes to the Progressive liberal view that the Constitution “ is not a static but rather a living document, and must be read in the context of an ever changing world.” Got a problem with the Constitution? - USATODAY.com


2. He did not teach, and seems to have no knowledge of the structural aspects of the Constitution, such as the separation of powers, or of the nature of executive power.

a. Obama taught the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the liberal’s favorite clause, and the pretext for many of the radical Supreme Court rulings of the Warren Court era. Barack Obama, Constitutional Ignoramus | Power Line

b. The other courses he taught were “Racism and the Law” and voting rights. Politics | Kagan: From a mock Supreme Court to the real thing | Seattle Times Newspaper



3. “In a Sept. 6, 2001, interview with Chicago Public Radio station WBEZ-FM, Mr. Obama noted that the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren "never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society," and "to that extent as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical." He also noted that the Court "didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it has been interpreted." That is to say, he noted that the U.S. Constitution as written is only a guarantee of negative liberties from government -- and not an entitlement to a right to welfare or economic justice.” Obama's 'Redistribution' Constitution - WSJ.com

a. Those ‘constraints’ include protections of private property, and individual liberty. Based on this, how can Mr. Obama live up to the oath of President: to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution"?



4. At a March 30, 2007, campaign fundraiser, then-candidate Barack Obama stated "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president, I actually respect the Constitution."

a. Of course, he immediately continued the practice of ‘signing statements.” Remember this: “ We’re not going to use signing statements as a way of doing an end run around Congress.” Obama to add signing statement to defense authorization opposing McCain-Levin amendment « Hot Air

b. Then, afraid of the court's view of ObamaCare: "I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress. And I'd just remind conservative commentators that for years what we've heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint."

c. “Seriously, Mr. President? The Supreme Court (or, as he's referred to them, "an unelected group of people") doesn't have the authority to strike down acts of Congress that violate the Constitution? For a supposed former "constitutional law professor," these statements betray a shocking level of ignorance about the concept of judicial review and the 1803 case, Marbury v. Madison, that enshrined it in American jurisprudence.” Legally Speaking: President Obama, time for a refresher course on Constitutional Law" | Southeast Texas Record

d. In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal…. As the Internet meme goes these days: FAIL! Uh, uh, uh, — that “notion” was enshrined in our Declaration of Independence, third paragraph, first sentence. One would think that this alleged professor of “Constitutional Law” at the University of Chicago Law School would have noticed such a simple, yet substantial, error.” Texas Insider » State of the Union: Obama v. Constitution



5. In a way, Mr.Obama has done the nation a great favor by reviving public interest in the Constitution, and specifically the clauses, spelling out the “few and defined” powers, as James Madison put it, of the federal government. And that is what the Tea Party movement is about!

a. The election of 2012 could mark the end of a Progressive century,- from Woodrow Wilson, 1912- and a return to an older, sounder constitutional order. It is a reminder that the Constitution begins “We the people…”

Above from "The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Presidents," Steven Hayward



So, the resume of the President with the thinnest record of achievement of any modern President, got even thinner.

November....the choice is clear.

all of it.

Are you really so lonely that you post knowing in advance that you are no more than comic relief?


To the point: perhaps you don't realize that it can't be 'speculation' since it is rich with direct quotes.....


So sad: Just ten more points on your I.Q., and you could have gotten a job as a seeing-eye person for a blind dog.


Has Jodie Foster responded to your notes?
 
I don't mean to derail the thread but Bush was on par with Obama on accomplishments and Mitt is just as bad off... Let’s be honest, Mitt ran his state into the ground with one of the biggest grabs of power in HC that any state has ever done, then he made the rest of the country pay for it at about 500 million a year so he didn’t have to raise taxes in his state.

As far as I know Mitts record in business is not all that stellar either, he in fact did nothing that most random people picked up of the street couldn't do.

Mitt never served in the armed forces and as far as I can tell he never held a job that didn't pay him millions for less than 15 hours a week of "work."

My point is not to defend Obama because Obama is in fact a stupid human being with almost no understanding of the constitution, but almost everything that proves Obama has a stunning lack of understanding of the constitution Mitt supported or even did as Governor… Presidents today seem to be the anti American, like both sides have pushed so far from our rule of law that to debate who is worse has lost all meaning.

Who cares if Mitt made a bunch of money, he has ZERO plans to cut with the budget he offered up, in fact his budget would slightly add to the deficit spending Obama is currently doing if I remember correctly.
 
1. Although Obama claims to be a constitutional scholar, he has never published a single scholarly article or book, although he was a lecturer at the University of Chicago. He subscribes to the Progressive liberal view that the Constitution “ is not a static but rather a living document, and must be read in the context of an ever changing world.” Got a problem with the Constitution? - USATODAY.com


2. He did not teach, and seems to have no knowledge of the structural aspects of the Constitution, such as the separation of powers, or of the nature of executive power.

a. Obama taught the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the liberal’s favorite clause, and the pretext for many of the radical Supreme Court rulings of the Warren Court era. Barack Obama, Constitutional Ignoramus | Power Line

b. The other courses he taught were “Racism and the Law” and voting rights. Politics | Kagan: From a mock Supreme Court to the real thing | Seattle Times Newspaper



3. “In a Sept. 6, 2001, interview with Chicago Public Radio station WBEZ-FM, Mr. Obama noted that the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren "never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society," and "to that extent as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical." He also noted that the Court "didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it has been interpreted." That is to say, he noted that the U.S. Constitution as written is only a guarantee of negative liberties from government -- and not an entitlement to a right to welfare or economic justice.” Obama's 'Redistribution' Constitution - WSJ.com

a. Those ‘constraints’ include protections of private property, and individual liberty. Based on this, how can Mr. Obama live up to the oath of President: to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution"?



4. At a March 30, 2007, campaign fundraiser, then-candidate Barack Obama stated "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president, I actually respect the Constitution."

a. Of course, he immediately continued the practice of ‘signing statements.” Remember this: “ We’re not going to use signing statements as a way of doing an end run around Congress.” Obama to add signing statement to defense authorization opposing McCain-Levin amendment « Hot Air

b. Then, afraid of the court's view of ObamaCare: "I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress. And I'd just remind conservative commentators that for years what we've heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint."

c. “Seriously, Mr. President? The Supreme Court (or, as he's referred to them, "an unelected group of people") doesn't have the authority to strike down acts of Congress that violate the Constitution? For a supposed former "constitutional law professor," these statements betray a shocking level of ignorance about the concept of judicial review and the 1803 case, Marbury v. Madison, that enshrined it in American jurisprudence.” Legally Speaking: President Obama, time for a refresher course on Constitutional Law" | Southeast Texas Record

d. In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal…. As the Internet meme goes these days: FAIL! Uh, uh, uh, — that “notion” was enshrined in our Declaration of Independence, third paragraph, first sentence. One would think that this alleged professor of “Constitutional Law” at the University of Chicago Law School would have noticed such a simple, yet substantial, error.” Texas Insider » State of the Union: Obama v. Constitution



5. In a way, Mr.Obama has done the nation a great favor by reviving public interest in the Constitution, and specifically the clauses, spelling out the “few and defined” powers, as James Madison put it, of the federal government. And that is what the Tea Party movement is about!

a. The election of 2012 could mark the end of a Progressive century,- from Woodrow Wilson, 1912- and a return to an older, sounder constitutional order. It is a reminder that the Constitution begins “We the people…”

Above from "The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Presidents," Steven Hayward



So, the resume of the President with the thinnest record of achievement of any modern President, got even thinner.

November....the choice is clear.

all of it.

Are you really so lonely that you post knowing in advance that you are no more than comic relief?


To the point: perhaps you don't realize that it can't be 'speculation' since it is rich with direct quotes.....


So sad: Just ten more points on your I.Q., and you could have gotten a job as a seeing-eye person for a blind dog.


Has Jodie Foster responded to your notes?

What are you talking about??? What a stupid post!!! Almost as stupid as the original post going on and on about the prez. And you are the stupid one!!! So what if something is, "rich with direct quotes"?? It doesn't make the words true. Look at you!!!
 
I don't mean to derail the thread but Bush was on par with Obama on accomplishments and Mitt is just as bad off... Let’s be honest, Mitt ran his state into the ground with one of the biggest grabs of power in HC that any state has ever done, then he made the rest of the country pay for it at about 500 million a year so he didn’t have to raise taxes in his state.

As far as I know Mitts record in business is not all that stellar either, he in fact did nothing that most random people picked up of the street couldn't do.

Mitt never served in the armed forces and as far as I can tell he never held a job that didn't pay him millions for less than 15 hours a week of "work."

My point is not to defend Obama because Obama is in fact a stupid human being with almost no understanding of the constitution, but almost everything that proves Obama has a stunning lack of understanding of the constitution Mitt supported or even did as Governor… Presidents today seem to be the anti American, like both sides have pushed so far from our rule of law that to debate who is worse has lost all meaning.

Who cares if Mitt made a bunch of money, he has ZERO plans to cut with the budget he offered up, in fact his budget would slightly add to the deficit spending Obama is currently doing if I remember correctly.

Certainly glad to have you share your thoughts on Obama vis-a-vis Bush vis-a-vis Romney.......

...but, to be certain that you understand the import of the OP, it is engendered because only one of the three claims to be a constitutional scholar.

The OP provides confirmation that this is not the case, and disabuses all and every supporter of Obama so as to prove that they have been hoodwinked.
 
Politicalchic would really love the 14th amendment if Asian looking peeps were discriminated against by law though, wouldn't she? No need to answer, I know you won't.
 
all of it.

Are you really so lonely that you post knowing in advance that you are no more than comic relief?


To the point: perhaps you don't realize that it can't be 'speculation' since it is rich with direct quotes.....


So sad: Just ten more points on your I.Q., and you could have gotten a job as a seeing-eye person for a blind dog.


Has Jodie Foster responded to your notes?

What are you talking about??? What a stupid post!!! Almost as stupid as the original post going on and on about the prez. And you are the stupid one!!! So what if something is, "rich with direct quotes"?? It doesn't make the words true. Look at you!!!


1.Welcome to 'Renata's Remediation Room,' where the simplest of folks are instructed in the use of the English language.

a. stu·pid/ˈst(y)o͞opid/
Adjective:
Lacking intelligence or common sense.


b. in·tel·li·gence/inˈtelijəns/
Noun:
The ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.
The collection of information of military or political value: "military intelligence".


c. quote/kwōt/
Verb:
Repeat or copy out (a group of words from a text or speech), typically with an indication that one is not the original author or speaker.


d. true (tr)
adj. tru·er, tru·est
1.
a. Consistent with fact or reality; not false or erroneous. See Synonyms at real1. See Usage Note at fact.
b. Truthful


Very good, Rinata!
See how much you can learn if you apply yourself!


2. Now, let's see an example of a quote: At a March 30, 2007, campaign fundraiser, then-candidate Barack Obama stated "I was a constitutional law professor,..."

You say: "So what if something is, "rich with direct quotes"?? It doesn't make the words true."
See, that's a quote, too, Rinata! And a truthful one! A gold star for Rinata! She found a great big ol' lie by Obama!!

(see...he wasn't a professor).
And the OP shows that he certainly can't be called 'constitutional'!

And here's another quote: “ We’re not going to use signing statements as a way of doing an end run around Congress.”
Starting to understand what a quote is?
Good girl!

And, it was a big fib, too! Right?
'Cause he went right out did the opposite of his promise.


And get this one: ""I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step..."

un·prec·e·dent·ed (n-prs-dntd)
adj.
Having no previous example


OK...so this one is over your head.....
Just take my word: he fibbed again.


One more?
Would a 'constitutional scholar' mistake the Constitution for the Declaration of Independence?

You're familiar with the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence?
Good girl!
Well...he isn't familiar with 'em.
So....you get the point?


3. Awwwww....I see how disappointed you are with the fraud in the White House...so I'll let you go right out to find a nice pic of the Romney family for your avi.

No....you don't have to thank me for the education.
A conservative is never so tall as when she stoops to help an idiot....er, a liberal.

Now, remember...America needs Obama like Nancy
Pelosi needs a Halloween mask!



OK....time for you to disappear into fat air....

Ta ta.
 
Obama's totally ignorant of the concept of "Judicial Review" making him stupidier than Dan Quayle, Sarah Palin and Joe Biden combined
 

Forum List

Back
Top