NYC set to settle suit over making Money slim women remove hijab for mugshot photos

BackAgain

Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Nov 11, 2021
42,697
41,881
3,488
Now a resident of a Red state! Hallelujah!
This one is too stupid to believe.


What’s the purpose of a mug shot that hides the face?

IMG_0908.jpeg

Now granted, ^ that’s a burka.

But if a Muslim woman wants to wear a hijab, some of them conceal the face, not just the hair.
 
This one is too stupid to believe.


What’s the purpose of a mug shot that hides the face?

View attachment 928176
Now granted, ^ that’s a burka.

But if a Muslim woman wants to wear a hijab, some of them conceal the face, not just the hair.
Really?

This one too?

 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
This one is too stupid to believe.


What’s the purpose of a mug shot that hides the face?

View attachment 928176
Now granted, ^ that’s a burka.

But if a Muslim woman wants to wear a hijab, some of them conceal the face, not just the hair.
"The lawsuit also led to the NYPD changing its policy in 2020, to stop requiring people to remove religious head coverings such as hijabs or yarmulkes after their arrest, with limited exemptions if the covering obscured the individual’s facial features."

So the women who sued were not wearing what you are insinuating they wore?

quotes: The settlement is subject to approval from a judge.
NYC Law Department spokesman Nick Paolucci said in an emailed statement early Saturday that the settlement “resulted in a positive reform for the NYPD.”

“The agreement carefully balances the department’s respect for firmly held religious beliefs with the important law enforcement need to take arrest photos. This resolution was in the best interest of all parties,” he added.

Other lawsuits have also been brought over similar cases elsewhere in the country.

Last year, a 37-year-old woman brought a lawsuit against the sheriff and three law enforcement officers in Rutherford County, Tenn., who she said told her to remove her hijab or stay in jail indefinitely.



No one here has mentioned how the hajibs in question were worn.

hajib Woman_in_Tunisia.jpg
 
"The lawsuit also led to the NYPD changing its policy in 2020, to stop requiring people to remove religious head coverings such as hijabs or yarmulkes after their arrest, with limited exemptions if the covering obscured the individual’s facial features."

So the women who sued were not wearing what you are insinuating they wore?

quotes: The settlement is subject to approval from a judge.
NYC Law Department spokesman Nick Paolucci said in an emailed statement early Saturday that the settlement “resulted in a positive reform for the NYPD.”

“The agreement carefully balances the department’s respect for firmly held religious beliefs with the important law enforcement need to take arrest photos. This resolution was in the best interest of all parties,” he added.

Other lawsuits have also been brought over similar cases elsewhere in the country.

Last year, a 37-year-old woman brought a lawsuit against the sheriff and three law enforcement officers in Rutherford County, Tenn., who she said told her to remove her hijab or stay in jail indefinitely.



No one here has mentioned how the hajibs in question were worn.

View attachment 928188
The dainty ^ is now demonstrating his perpetual zeal for arguing just for the sake of arguing. Making sense isn’t a requirement in his world.
 
Attention all units .. we are looking for an Arab female, 5'2" wearing a hijab

View attachment 928183

In leftist New York. That's not surprising. The hijab can also be a face covering. I didn't see if that was the issue here.

The Islamic shame-sack is not a religious article. It's a 'quaint' cultural relic enforced by sexually repressed men in a patriarchal culture.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top