Nunes Calls Comey, Rogers For "Closed Session" After Finding "Concerning Info" In Intel Reports

It looks like a couple of bad boys are about to get a spanking.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-24/nunes-calls-comey-rogers-closed-session-after-finding-concerning-info-intel-reports

Last night we highlighted a Fox News story which suggested that Devin Nunes expected the NSA to deliver a "smoking gun" which would prove that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly the president-elect himself, as early as today.

Moments ago, Nunes fanned that speculation by holding an impromptu press conference announcing that he'll call both FBI Director Comey and NSA Director Rogers before a closed session of the House Intelligence Committee to discuss topics which "they couldn't answer in a public setting."
Nunes should be thrown off his own committee for not being impartial which is the most important factor when being on that committee.
 
It looks like a couple of bad boys are about to get a spanking.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-24/nunes-calls-comey-rogers-closed-session-after-finding-concerning-info-intel-reports

Last night we highlighted a Fox News story which suggested that Devin Nunes expected the NSA to deliver a "smoking gun" which would prove that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly the president-elect himself, as early as today.

Moments ago, Nunes fanned that speculation by holding an impromptu press conference announcing that he'll call both FBI Director Comey and NSA Director Rogers before a closed session of the House Intelligence Committee to discuss topics which "they couldn't answer in a public setting."

Wait....wut?

Why would nunes call Comey and what does the Pope have to say about this?
 
Wonder why Comey was seen leaving the WH today?

Comey was invited there to see if he'd take a bribe to lay off the orange charlatan's investigation....so, what new?.............LOL

It was a honest question, if you can't try to answer it move on to someone else with your nonsense.

Hey, moron, Comey...last Monday.....basically stated that the Trump administration is UNDER INVESTIGATION.....an investigation that may lead to CRIMINAL charges..So, what do you think Comey was invited to the WH for...tea and biscuits?

Hey MORON, could you possibly cease with your infanitle name calling in every post?

There isn't going to be any criminal charges...you'll be left holding the bag again. Take my "advise" and find a new narrative
You name calling hypocrite, SovietSassy. Don't dish what you can't take, lassie.
 
If he has the "smoking gun" you guys are so desperate for, why would he have a "closed" session with Comey and Rogers, rather than the open hearing that was already scheduled?

To give Comey and Rogers one last chance to not follow Julius and Ethel Rosenberg
 
If he has the "smoking gun" you guys are so desperate for, why would he have a "closed" session with Comey and Rogers, rather than the open hearing that was already scheduled?

Let me answer, let me answer!

Ever see somebody actually try and prosecute a whole former administration before? I believe it is unprecedented. And you have to know that with everything swirling over the past 8 years, the odds are at least one accusation is correct.

Add to that, if since with so many, one has to be accurate just by the laws of probability, evidence is still available to prove it.

Why?

Because they didn't take a year to thoroughly get rid of it. Ever liberal from Obama on down to Rightinger believed that Hillary would win. She would then become the keeper of the archives, which she to is probably named in, also easily concluded by the laws of probability.

To Bri, I say this-----> I believe that mass prosecutions of the Obama administration would be a Trump administration down. The left would instantly change the narrative to political prosecution, and with prosecutors not being able to release hard evidence to the public, the trials would have to happen before the elections of 18 or the narrative would only go one way; phony victimology on one side, dictated by law.....very little or nothing from the other. A political sticky wicket it seems. The Dems chances of winning would rise for 18, and if they won, there would go the prosecution!

Nope Bri, they gotta get someone (s) lower in the food chain, then make them sing like a bird, then use the evidence as leverage. One to 3 prosecutions, then cut a deal, which is not exactly what we want, but if it proves we were correct, and forces the Democrats to shut up in fear of the whole Dumbocratic house of cards collapsing on them, that is not a bad outcome.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
If he has the "smoking gun" you guys are so desperate for, why would he have a "closed" session with Comey and Rogers, rather than the open hearing that was already scheduled?
Because in a closed door session Comey and Rogers are able to disclose to the committee information which is 'classified'.
When you LIBs lost to someone you claimed was nothing but an "orange Clown" to your candidate who turned out to be the worst presidential candidate in US history you couldn't believe who fucking stupid you all were.
You all will NEVER get over the humiliation.
When your "The Russians Stole The Election From Our Queen!" bullshit blows up in your face maybe you'll move from 'Humiliation' to the next step: Deep Embarrassment.
If the Russian hacked into the DNC and found nothing to prove what a bunch of corrupt POS surrounded your 'Queen' then the Russians wouldn't have had anything to prove what a corrupt POS Hillary et al were/are.
The DEMs have no one to blame but themselves.
 
It looks like a couple of bad boys are about to get a spanking.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-24/nunes-calls-comey-rogers-closed-session-after-finding-concerning-info-intel-reports

Last night we highlighted a Fox News story which suggested that Devin Nunes expected the NSA to deliver a "smoking gun" which would prove that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly the president-elect himself, as early as today.

Moments ago, Nunes fanned that speculation by holding an impromptu press conference announcing that he'll call both FBI Director Comey and NSA Director Rogers before a closed session of the House Intelligence Committee to discuss topics which "they couldn't answer in a public setting."

Bri, just so you understand, unless they get someone and publicly smack them around, the Democrats have won.

It makes no difference that there is nothing on Trump, because there are two competing narratives and to seal the defense , the other side must be proven wrong.

If this does not happen, the fabrications will get worse, and after seeing retaliation, the left will be much more careful not to put themselves in a position to get hosed.

Trump and the Republicans have them by the shorthairs as we speak. I know it, you know it, and hell.....many of the lefty posters on here are even pretty sure of it.

They had better remember that "for the good of the country" doesn't always mean covering up. Sometimes it means----> being able to put in your agenda before it is to late and easily, because your opponents totally screwed up.

President Trump, want to drain the swamp? You got anything close to the goods on them? Well, here is your chance! If you don't and do have the goods; then many of our votes for you sir, were wasted. You promised to make government work for us, not let the the government and the left, lie about both us and you!


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I hope he prosecutes them to the fullest extent of the law. Republicans are too inclined to turn the other cheek. You can't do that with vipers like the Dims. You need to cut their head off to make sure they can't bite you in the ass.

Turn what other cheek? They lied about and persecuted the Clintons for 35 years because Bill and Hillary did a good job and were well liked by voters. How dare they!!! 35 years of calling them criminals and having them endlessly investigated which produced no charges, no fines, nothing. And yet Republicans still want to prosecute the Clintons.

You must be blind, the Clintons are good at covering there tracks, why has the donations to the Clinton foundation stopped, did they just decide to stop doing so mush good, or could it be there is no more pay for play? Timing is just a little coincidental don't you think?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Forum List

Back
Top