Taz
Gold Member
- Jul 8, 2014
- 22,876
- 2,119
- 190
- Banned
- #721
So you don't disagree with me. Good for you. But does that make YOU a bimbo as well?But a rich Arab-American might want to purchase a nuke or any other weapons we're currently not allowed to have, so practical applications are out there. You're just happy cherry-picking your outrage. Got it.I agree that you SHOULD have the right to these weapon, but we don't, that's my point. My other point is that nobody seems to care about that, they only care about guns, in a cherry-picking kind of way.But it's not just nukes that they have more than your guns, they have tanks, mortars, bombs, cruise missiles AA missiles... all kinds of things that you're not allowed to have. Nukes was just an example.
You should be able to have all those things as long as you do it without violating the rights of other citizens.
And the hypocrite who thinks children have 2nd amendment rights but not 14th amendment equal protection rights trying to show this is a conflicting argument is hysterical
As you know, I do support those rights. But of course the discussion is more about guns since that is the primary issue that effects us right now. You cannot assign to your opposition what you think their priority should be.
I am against capital punishment. But it's not a big issue to me. I wouldn't go to a demonstration.
I cannot agree with my theoretical right to nuclear weapons being blocked by our government, but I see no practical application of that since I don't have any idea why I would want them or if I did how I would do that without killing my neighbors with radiation.
It's not a real argument to tell people you want to assign our priorities.
Your restricting my ability to defend myself is directly impacting my life today. Of course that's my priority
So you treat every view you have with the same priority? Of course you don't you stupid bimbo