Nothing has chased more Christians away from this religion then the evangelicals

[Lysistrata]

I am currently rethinking the whole concept of Christianity and my identity as a Christian. The evangelicals have so prostituted the teachings and sacredness of this faith that I am considering walking away from it altogether. There are other options available.

Hysteria, aren't you rethinking your whole humanity thing? You fit better with swine... Allahu Akbar

How do I fit in with swine like graham or jeffress or focus on the family, the family research coucil, the countless swine preachers?

 

[Polishprince]

I am currently rethinking the whole concept of Christianity and my identity as a Christian. The evangelicals have so prostituted the teachings and sacredness of this faith that I am considering walking away from it altogether. There are other options available.

You can become part of the Religious Left if you don't like it. The Radical Episcopalianists would take you since you believe that sodomy and abortion should be glorified. Ditto with the Unitarians, or Jim Wallis' radical flock.

If you don't believe in the basic message of the Bible, there are alternatives.

Of course, the problem groups like Radical Episcopalianists have is that people don't have to be a member to go out and take it in the caboose.

There is really little reason to join.

 

[jbander]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

So, are you a Christian?

So are you a right wing ass hole?

Thanks, I pretty much figured you weren't. Like most on the left, you just spew ignorant hatred about everything you know absolutely nothing about. Dismissed.

Wow a master of hate say's that I'm hateful. I've done the whole route on finding about what is in both the Koran and the bible. So I'm quite sure I know more about the subject then a tweak like you. You can't elect the devil as your leader and then turn around and tell me your a Christian. That's the point. You ugly hatred is there for everyone to see by your support of your God and leader scum bag. You both wash in the same toilet.

 

[jbander]

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

With your overpowering logic and understanding of this group, you must have many friends from that group. Do you keep your eyes closed when you have sex ,Do you even know what the body of the person you have sex with looks like? Do you even know what the opposite sex looks like without cloths. Do you pray when you have sex. It seems you have a bit of a hangup over sexual things , you can be helped, there's many psychiatrist that can work with you but a good start would be, just for once, open your eyes when you have sex , it will be good for you.

 

[jbander]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

Oh yeah, that's why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, because of good decent people and not the filthy perverts, huh.

You seem to have a hangup about this gay thing , My guess is that your hiding from your real self.

 

[jbander]

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

I'm not being "disparaging" by calling someone a pimp or a hoe or a homo at all. This is what they are, and they traditionally were in their own habitat. Most of this kind of activity is no longer on the streets nowadays and is more "on line".

But these folks just aren't normative. A neighbor of mine in the alley I used to live in was a pimp daddy. Its part of life.

I certainly don't hate someone for this kind of activity, but don't tell me the Godfather is typical or is going to pretend to be devout like "Mayor Pete".

I'm pretty sure many people can read into your brash words about gays. The first time you did it , it was a Freudian slip but now that you came out to yourself you are now hiding from the truth. I've seen many people like you.

 

[Polishprince]

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

I'm not being "disparaging" by calling someone a pimp or a hoe or a homo at all. This is what they are, and they traditionally were in their own habitat. Most of this kind of activity is no longer on the streets nowadays and is more "on line".

But these folks just aren't normative. A neighbor of mine in the alley I used to live in was a pimp daddy. Its part of life.

I certainly don't hate someone for this kind of activity, but don't tell me the Godfather is typical or is going to pretend to be devout like "Mayor Pete".

I'm pretty sure many people can read into your brash words about gays. The first time you did it , it was a Freudian slip but now that you came out to yourself you are now hiding from the truth. I've seen many people like you.

The only thing I've criticized about homos is the fact that they are trying to force acceptance of their new institution of Gay Marriage up the caboose of the general public.

If someone chooses the gay orientation, that's certainly their privilege. But the whole question is whether people should be forced to celebrate it.

 

[jbander]

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

Oh yeah, that's why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, because of good decent people and not the filthy perverts, huh.

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with the LGBT business.

The people of Sodom named their town after sodomy, they were clearly big fans of the practice.

Of course it had everything to do with it.

Almighty God agreed to spare Sodom if there 5 normative folks could be found there. So he sent down a couple of his holy angels to check out the situation on the ground. They were staying with God's friend, Lot. The Gay Community of Sodom immediately went over to Lot's domicile in an attempt to recruit the angels into the gay lifestyle.

Not even close,First it was 10 people not five. All the people from many quarters came to the house and wanted to have sex with the angels who were , what sex? was it sex or gay sex . all the people from all quarters is that men and women. And lets get this straight So if we are to believe this story , then we have to some how get around the fact that Lot offered his two virgin daughters to be gang raped by the crowd. So is this a story or a fable. Do you pratice the laws of Leviticus cause if you don't and you don't then all the story's in the old testament are under scrutiny, When your children argued with you did you take them to the gate and have the people kill them for you or were you man enough to kill them yourselves, So is that a true story or a fable . You clowns are a gas, mealy minded self righteous obnoxious, I'm better then you people.

 

[jbander]

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

I'm not being "disparaging" by calling someone a pimp or a hoe or a homo at all. This is what they are, and they traditionally were in their own habitat. Most of this kind of activity is no longer on the streets nowadays and is more "on line".

But these folks just aren't normative. A neighbor of mine in the alley I used to live in was a pimp daddy. Its part of life.

I certainly don't hate someone for this kind of activity, but don't tell me the Godfather is typical or is going to pretend to be devout like "Mayor Pete".

I'm pretty sure many people can read into your brash words about gays. The first time you did it , it was a Freudian slip but now that you came out to yourself you are now hiding from the truth. I've seen many people like you.

The only thing I've criticized about homos is the fact that they are trying to force acceptance of their new institution of Gay Marriage up the caboose of the general public.

If someone chooses the gay orientation, that's certainly their privilege. But the whole question is whether people should be forced to celebrate it.

Forced to celebrate it , that tops the stupid list. Your one pitiful pup.

 

[jbander]

I am currently rethinking the whole concept of Christianity and my identity as a Christian. The evangelicals have so prostituted the teachings and sacredness of this faith that I am considering walking away from it altogether. There are other options available.

You can become part of the Religious Left if you don't like it. The Radical Episcopalianists would take you since you believe that sodomy and abortion should be glorified. Ditto with the Unitarians, or Jim Wallis' radical flock.

If you don't believe in the basic message of the Bible, there are alternatives.

Of course, the problem groups like Radical Episcopalianists have is that people don't have to be a member to go out and take it in the caboose.

There is really little reason to join.

Glorified? you really believe in overkill. You are quite funny though. Two in a row on the stupid list.

 

[jbander]

You can never lose a argument with these Evangelicals , they will always show who they really are and it seems to be the absolute opposite of what they claim.

 

[jbander]

They be a ugly group of humanity

 

[presonorek]

They be a ugly group of humanity

Do you disagree with certain doctrines of the evangelical movement?

or

Does it have more to do with the behaviors of the evangelical Christian's? If that is the case, can their behavior be independent of their doctrine?

 

[BS Filter]

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

No. I have never known any pimps or "hoes." I have had friends and colleagues who were LGBT; decent people whom I take it you are disparaging as "homos." The only encounters I have had with the "red light district" involved being in a car coming home from our part-time restaurant jobs with my college friends and stopped at a red light at 14th and Q, N.W., Washington, D.C. and viewing various people standing around in scant clothing and one time walking with a roommate (an African American) in downtown DC, when we were shouted at by some white guy who was either a pimp or a john. Where do you live that people are flaunting sex? What circle do you run with?

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

Oh yeah, that's why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, because of good decent people and not the filthy perverts, huh.

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with the LGBT business.

Oh, here we go. You're gonna tell us God destroyed the cities because the residents were "impolite", huh.

Do you actually interpret the bible as being infallible and inerrant?

Nobody is having sex in the middle of the street, bubba.

Yes, I believe that the Bible is the inerrant total Word of God, inspired by the Holy Spirit and preserved by the power of God.

 

[BS Filter]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

So, are you a Christian?

So are you a right wing ass hole?

Thanks, I pretty much figured you weren't. Like most on the left, you just spew ignorant hatred about everything you know absolutely nothing about. Dismissed.

Wow a master of hate say's that I'm hateful. I've done the whole route on finding about what is in both the Koran and the bible. So I'm quite sure I know more about the subject then a tweak like you. You can't elect the devil as your leader and then turn around and tell me your a Christian. That's the point. You ugly hatred is there for everyone to see by your support of your God and leader scum bag. You both wash in the same toilet.

So are you a Christian?

 

[BS Filter]

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Garbage you can do anything the law allows. You higher then high people need a Island to throw your hatred of just about everything back and forth , cause I don't want to hear it in main street, it's way to ugly, way worse then gays and way worse then LGBTs

Oh yeah, that's why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, because of good decent people and not the filthy perverts, huh.

You seem to have a hangup about this gay thing , My guess is that your hiding from your real self.

Does the New Testament state that homosexuality is sin?

 

[presonorek]

They be a ugly group of humanity

This appears to be an anti-Trump thread instead of a theological debate. I will try to read more and see. If this is just a Trump bashing thread then I am not interested. People have been doing that immature stuff since George Washington was president.

My advice is: Cry for 2 or 3 days after an election, do normal stuff for 3.75 years then try to elect a better president. Obsessing over losing an election is childish. It surprises me that grown ups can't get over something so insignificant. Congress has way more power than the president. Your local government has more reach over your life than a president. Trump won. Cry for a few days then go live life . Did you not notice people did this with Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, and Carter? The president never gets kicked out of office no matter how rotten he is. Whining is stupid and makes the whiner look like a retard. Grow up. Elect someone different next time. The winner in a presidential election should be congratulated for winning even if you didn't want him to win. Welcome to the land of grown ups.

 

[SweetSue92]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

Well we know that by electing scum bag you pick evil, so we know there is a market for it, so your hateful evangelical ministers fill that market and sell it. Aren't you getting a little sick of you pampas Bible thumping weird evangelical ministers that don't live the words they are catching you with. It funny.

VERY self-righteous

 

[SweetSue92]

Personally I don't want to have anything to do with this twisted group. Their Idea of Christianity isn't mine and its rejected more and more by the rest of us everyday. Correlating the idea that you can elect the devil as your leader and still call yourself a Christian , simply is beyond rational thinking. I've heard their responses to this and if it wasn't so important I would simply laugh at their justification to elect and support this evil, cruel , mean, hateful, lying, mental case. No one is less of a Christian then this truly controlling evil person. God will always come way down the list for this guy.

You don't have to like Evangelicals if you don't want to. I understand that they are offensive to the Far Left for their opposition to Sodomy and the Abortion Trade.

However, evangelical churches are actually declining less than the institutions of the All Powerful Religious Left. The number of Radical Episcopalianists and unitarians has really shrunk over the years.

Like I said, you don't have to like it, but evangelicalism is the only thing keeping a lot of churches together.

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

Oh the Muslim card, Well I've read the Koran and the bible multiple times , The Koran is about half as violent as the bible an has a superior conscious behind it as does the bible.

Looking for one single original thought from you

Failing to find one

Will keep looking

 

[SweetSue92]

I am not "far left" and I find them offensive anyway because they seek to interfere in the lives of people who do not hold their views on LGBTs and reproductive decisions, among other issues, thus seeking to limit the freedoms of other individuals to think for themselves, and they try to abuse the law to do it. People can have whatever churches, temples, synagogues, mosques that they want, and hold their rituals and uphold their traditions. However, they have no business butting into other people's personal lives and decisions.

Your choice of religion is not everybody's choice of religion.

Do you find the Religious Left institutions like the Episcopalianist Faith and the Muslims to be offensive as well?

They want to control the people's lives by outlawing the burning of korans and forcing people to accept and affirm sodomy, even forcing we, the people, to bake cakes to celebrate anal intercourse like those folks in the Oregon bakery.

The ideas presented by religious leftists like Lou Farrakhan and Jim Wallis are their own, I can accept them. But they often become things that affect me personally.

How are you "we, the people"? How have Episcopalians or Muslims interfered with anyone else's personal lives? Called anyone names? Participated in the burning of the scriptures of any faith? I'm not familiar with how Episcopalians or Muslims are political, left, right, moderate, or center.

How is anyone being forced to accept anything except what they themselves set out to do as a business under our general business laws?

Tell me how I am supposed to handle members of a "conservative Christian" cult whom I find completely offensive, or members of groups that uphold the patriarchal system of dick-wagging. The law forces all of us to wait on them, no matter how offensive they are to us.

Well when it comes to Violent Muslims they are all conservative. Just like the violence in this country massive majority from the right. The hate bigger then the left.

Muslims are liberals.

LGBTP's have no right to bring the Red Districts on to Main Street and then demand all the other people be passive and accepting of it all. It is no better than nudist claiming that they have a right to expose themselves to other peoples children on Main Street and then try to force them to accept it and like them for it.

Do people have sex in public in your neighborhood? What is a "make out scene"? Does a departing kiss for someone going off to work with a briefcase and a bag lunch constitute a "make out scene"? A greeting hug at an airport? Do the people in your neighborhood pursue the "red light district" activities of pimping and prostituting?

I don't understand your thing about nudists exposing themselves.

I don't know where you live or what goes on in your neighborhood.

You know, some people kiss their significant others in public, and some hold hands while walking down the street.

I don't think you get the point, Lys.


It wasn't long ago, if someone wanted to pursue she-males or hoes, or engage in so-called "gay" activities, cities had districts where these types congregated. Porn theaters , massage parlors, adult bookstands, gay bars and bath houses, whatever you wanted.

Those who weren't interested in taking it in the caboose or dating she-males, would never see it.

The difference in the current era, is the homos are being public about their preferences among ordinary people who don't want to see it.

Please tell me where, in the United States of America, that people are having sex in the streets.

They usually don't "have sex" in the street, but they do flaunt it and sell it there and most often take it into their cars or restrooms or theaters.

I take it you don't have many pimps, homos or hoes in your circle of acquaintances?

With your overpowering logic and understanding of this group, you must have many friends from that group. Do you keep your eyes closed when you have sex ,Do you even know what the body of the person you have sex with looks like? Do you even know what the opposite sex looks like without cloths. Do you pray when you have sex. It seems you have a bit of a hangup over sexual things , you can be helped, there's many psychiatrist that can work with you but a good start would be, just for once, open your eyes when you have sex , it will be good for you.

Is this Hysteria's sock puppet???

Or do they all really think just like this???