noam chomsky vs milton friedman

Spending during a recession, or time after one with high unemployment still happening, is the best way to end recessions and high unemployment faster.

of course if true all economists would know it and we'd end recessions before they started or very quickly thereafter. Spending requires taxes. Get it? Taking money out of the economy then putting it back in yields no net benefit; in fact it does damage. Only a liberal is stupid enough to take water out of one side of the lake, put it in the other, and proclaim the lake is higher.
Liberals preach this to pander to the pure ignorance of liberals like you.
Get it? You've fallen for the propaganda just like those who followed Hitler Stalin and Mao!
 
Spending during a recession, or time after one with high unemployment still happening, is the best way to end recessions and high unemployment faster.

of course if true all economists would know it and we'd end recessions before they started or very quickly thereafter.
Macroeconomists already know how to end recessions/high unemployment, and in some cases, knew how to head them off when the environment was created for large scale recessions from deregulation. But let me give you a little lesson in basic civics. Politicians, often being led by ideology and party unity (and this is especially true on the right) won't institute policies that would be helpful to reduce the negative externalities of a recession. So, you as a voter have to stop sticking your head in the sand and support politicians who will steward the economy better than we saw in the past 33 years, and the rise of conservative dope policies.

Spending requires taxes. Get it? Taking money out of the economy then putting it back in yields no net benefit; in fact it does damage.
you're very naive when it comes to budgets. Revenues are required for spending. But, if the spending can be done that promotes growth over many more years than the spending (which is what stimulus is) the revenues will increase enough to pay for the deficits, as debt is decreased as a portion of GDP through GDP growth and inflation eats at the debt along with debt servicing.

Only a liberal is stupid enough to take water out of one side of the lake, put it in the other, and proclaim the lake is higher.
Only a conservative is enough of a moron to forget that the lake is fed by a stream, and it's raining, then proclaim the lake is lower.

Liberals preach this to pander to the pure ignorance of liberals like you.
Get it? You've fallen for the propaganda just like those who followed Hitler Stalin and Mao!
Godwin Law and Godwin Law 2.0. You lost three times in one of your idiotic, uninformed posts.
 
. But, if the spending can be done that promotes growth

too stupid of course given that the people who earned the money will spend it better than libturd bureaucrats wasting other people's money!!
Slow?
How many miles of interstate style highway did you create? How much did each mile cost you, and how many people did you employ?

Conservadopes like you have no clue how the economy works.
 
Only a conservative is enough of a moron to forget that the lake is fed by a stream, and it's raining, then proclaim the lake is lower.

dear, perhaps a pool is easier for you. Taxing and spending is like draining and filling. Get it now? Politicans tricked you and you fell for it. They want to spend on welfare not to stimulate the economy. All they need is perfect fools like you to buy into the pure ignorance.
 
Only a conservative is enough of a moron to forget that the lake is fed by a stream, and it's raining, then proclaim the lake is lower.

dear, perhaps a pool is easier for you. Taxing and spending is like draining and filling. Get it now? Politicans tricked you and you fell for it. They want to spend on welfare not to stimulate the economy. All they need is perfect fools like you to buy into the pure ignorance.
Just like. A conservative to be shown Asa loser, then try to change the rules of the game the conservative started. I'll smack this down...

I just turned on the pump to put more water into the pool.

Back to economics that you don't understand, Princess, spending multipliers exist for large scale spending programs by governments. When the economy is lacking demand, the government spending can increase demand needed for the economy to grow, then reduce the spending as the economy is recovered. The additional revenues from the economic growth pay for the deficits. And make those deficits a smaller portion of the economy from that growth.
 
How many miles of interstate style highway did you create?
.

none but why did you ask? Dear you clean forgot to say.
I asked, because highways create opportunities for wealth and job creation. Along with it, comes revenues for the government to use and keep from seeing deficits get too high. In other words, infrastructure created from the government spending creates a means for goods to get to markets, and consumers to make purchases. No infrastructure, no wealth creation.
 
Macroeconomists already know how to end recessions/high unemployment, and in some cases,

of course if true we would have no recession then!! See why we say slow?
Politicians set policy.

You're really unable to accept facts in your myopic view.

so politicians want depressions rather than economic booms?? Slow?
You were in the special education classes weren't you?

Just like you, many politicians put their failed ideology in front of the facts. So, they don't want recessions, even while they are voting for policies that help to create them. It's the same sort of denial you live in.
 
. So, they don't want recessions, even while they are voting for policies that help to create them.
So then why so afriad to name a Republican policy that creates recessions. What does your fear teach you?
I've already pointed to Republican obstruction of economic recovery to end recessions. I'll also point out that deregulation caused the last three recessions. Deregulation is a conservative approach I politics, that promises economic growth, but lowered economic growth in the median and long terms.
 

Forum List

Back
Top