Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Trump wanted McCabe fired before he fired Comey. Nice try, but that's been in the works way before the IG.Trump had NOTHING to do with McCabe being fired! The IG fired McCabe for repeatedly lying to the DOJ!Lawrence's Last Word: Andrew McCabe's credibility So, if Andrew McCabe is the liar like Trump claims, then how come no Republican has refuted McCabe's book? There are some seriously damaging concerns McCabe points out in the book that lead to having a SC, and yet, neither Trump or his followers have any counter arguing points that dismiss those concerns. I mean think about it, if McCabe's concerns weren't legit, why hasn't the Right explained those concerns away? Obviously McCabe and Rosenstein were spot on to inject a SC with so many indictments and guilty pleas handed over to people surrounding the Trump campaign?
And if they have no answers, then what exactly was the justification for firing McCabe?
McCabe is currently under a series of investigations by the DOJ who have fucking ZERO do to with Trump.
Grow up asshole!
McCabe looks like he won't mind a bit of rough sex with a 300 pound biker in their prison cell.
38 indictments, guilty pleas, and immunity agreements prove McCabe was spot on. And those folks have already been put in front of a prosecutor. Looks like the Right is way behind on their own convictions. Lol!Debunk?!?...A bunch of his tall tales and tin foil hat conspiracy lunacy are in contradiction to what numerous other confirmed liars -like Comey- have said....I can hardly wait until these clowns are put in front of a real prosecutor.Self destructing about what? A book you can't debunk? Lol!When an idiot is self-destructing, one just gets the hell out of the way and lets him have at it.In the mean time, we are still waiting on the rebuttal from McCabe's book. Lol!Lawrence's Last Word: Andrew McCabe's credibility So, if Andrew McCabe is the liar like Trump claims, then how come no Republican has refuted McCabe's book? There are some seriously damaging concerns McCabe points out in the book that lead to having a SC, and yet, neither Trump or his followers have any counter arguing points that dismiss those concerns. I mean think about it, if McCabe's concerns weren't legit, why hasn't the Right explained those concerns away? Obviously McCabe and Rosenstein were spot on to inject a SC with so many indictments and guilty pleas handed over to people surrounding the Trump campaign?
And if they have no answers, then what exactly was the justification for firing McCabe?
If they made some lame ass attempt at countering McCabe's book it would likely involve something like, "but Obama," "but Hillary," or some shit along those lines.
38 indictments, guilty charges, and immunity pleas is a coup?No need for a counter argument. The facts speak for themselves.. 1. He is a proven liar.. 2. He has exposed the coup for what it was..You haven't presented countering arguments. Telling me he is a liar is telling me nothing. "Imploding" on what? Lol! You have to give particulars if or ayou don't want to be proven a liar yourself. What circumstances behind McCabe's decision to install a SC was wrong? Bear in mind, that there are 38 indict?ments, guilty pleas, and others with immunity. How is that "unreliable?"We don't do stupid.... McCabe is already a liar an unreliable.. No need to dog pile on stupid as he is imploding all on his own and he is exposing Obama, Schumer, Pelosie, and many others as part of a failed Coup.. Why would we want to challenge that?
There is nothing to debunk.
Trey Gowdy was disgraced when got caught trying to frame Clinton. The guy is useless.Are you not watching the news? Trey Gowdy Was on tv the last 3 days lol
Democrats stop watching fake news
Tell me moron, how many of those "indictments" are related to collision with Russians?38 indictments, guilty charges, and immunity pleas is a coup?No need for a counter argument. The facts speak for themselves.. 1. He is a proven liar.. 2. He has exposed the coup for what it was..You haven't presented countering arguments. Telling me he is a liar is telling me nothing. "Imploding" on what?manLol! You have to give particulars if or ayou don't want to be proven a liar yourself. What circumstances behind McCabe's decision to install a SC was wrong? Bear in mind, that there are 38 indict?ments, guilty pleas, and others with immunity. How is that "unreliable?"We don't do stupid.... McCabe is already a liar an unreliable.. No need to dog pile on stupid as he is imploding all on his own and he is exposing Obama, Schumer, Pelosie, and many others as part of a failed Coup.. Why would we want to challenge that?
There is nothing to debunk.
not sure what it is we were supposed to do? he presented his evidence, he didn't suggest the 25th amendment to them.We don't do stupid.... McCabe is already a liar an unreliable.. No need to dog pile on stupid as he is imploding all on his own and he is exposing Obama, Schumer, Pelosie, and many others as part of a failed Coup.. Why would we want to challenge that?
On trumps orders. Hours before he was supposed to retire. Trump got him. Got him good. McCabe is getting Trump back. But McCabe is doing it with the truth.Really no one is challenging the credibility of a man the FBI disciplinary office recommended firing shocking.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph...d0dc1a-208a-11e8-86f6-54bfff693d2b_story.html
Trump ordered the FBI disciplinary office to recomend firing McCabe you really are a special kind of stupid.On trumps orders. Hours before he was supposed to retire. Trump got him. Got him good. McCabe is getting Trump back. But McCabe is doing it with the truth.Really no one is challenging the credibility of a man the FBI disciplinary office recommended firing shocking.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph...d0dc1a-208a-11e8-86f6-54bfff693d2b_story.html
All of them.Tell me moron, how many of those "indictments" are related to collision with Russians?38 indictments, guilty charges, and immunity pleas is a coup?No need for a counter argument. The facts speak for themselves.. 1. He is a proven liar.. 2. He has exposed the coup for what it was..You haven't presented countering arguments. Telling me he is a liar is telling me nothing. "Imploding" on what?manLol! You have to give particulars if or ayou don't want to be proven a liar yourself. What circumstances behind McCabe's decision to install a SC was wrong? Bear in mind, that there are 38 indict?ments, guilty pleas, and others with immunity. How is that "unreliable?"We don't do stupid.... McCabe is already a liar an unreliable.. No need to dog pile on stupid as he is imploding all on his own and he is exposing Obama, Schumer, Pelosie, and many others as part of a failed Coup.. Why would we want to challenge that?
There is nothing to debunk.
ZERO....
False equivalency of process crimes equaling guilt... Your a top shelf dupe.
Lawrence's Last Word: Andrew McCabe's credibility So, if Andrew McCabe is the liar like Trump claims, then how come no Republican has refuted McCabe's book? There are some seriously damaging concerns McCabe points out in the book that lead to having a SC, and yet, neither Trump or his followers have any counter arguing points that dismiss those concerns. I mean think about it, if McCabe's concerns weren't legit, why hasn't the Right explained those concerns away? Obviously McCabe and Rosenstein were spot on to inject a SC with so many indictments and guilty pleas handed over to people surrounding the Trump campaign?
And if they have no answers, then what exactly was the justification for firing McCabe?
And what? Do you want to provide some evidence? Have some breaking news snowflake? lolYes you are learning now lollol you didn’t say congress and Jim Jordan has been saying just as much.. stop watching fake newsAre you not watching the news? Trey Gowdy Was on tv the last 3 days lol
Democrats stop watching fake news
Who, he is not in Congress anymore and he does not matter.
Jim Jordan, Ohio state.
Ohio state sex scandal.
So, it's an ongoing investigation of which we still do not know what wrong doing McCabe did or did not do. Your own link makes that clear. Thanks!Really no one is challenging the credibility of a man the FBI disciplinary office recommended firing shocking.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph...d0dc1a-208a-11e8-86f6-54bfff693d2b_story.html
You mean the Jim Jordan who didn't report a pedophile who was molesting his wrestlers when he was a coach tho he's a mandatory reporter? That Jim Jordan?lol you didn’t say congress and Jim Jordan has been saying just as much.. stop watching fake newsAre you not watching the news? Trey Gowdy Was on tv the last 3 days lol
Democrats stop watching fake news
Who, he is not in Congress anymore and he does not matter.
As a result of McCabe's actions from the book, there have been 38 indictments, where there are guilty and immunity pleas included with that number. Republicans not wasting their time reading it, puts the ball in McCabe's court, not yours. Don't read it. I could care less. The truth will leave you and others behind with your pants down. And that's what is needed.Lawrence's Last Word: Andrew McCabe's credibility So, if Andrew McCabe is the liar like Trump claims, then how come no Republican has refuted McCabe's book? There are some seriously damaging concerns McCabe points out in the book that lead to having a SC, and yet, neither Trump or his followers have any counter arguing points that dismiss those concerns. I mean think about it, if McCabe's concerns weren't legit, why hasn't the Right explained those concerns away? Obviously McCabe and Rosenstein were spot on to inject a SC with so many indictments and guilty pleas handed over to people surrounding the Trump campaign?
And if they have no answers, then what exactly was the justification for firing McCabe?
Because no Republican is going to waste their time reading lies.
/——/ We never questioned the credibility of Alice in Wonderland either.Lawrence's Last Word: Andrew McCabe's credibility So, if Andrew McCabe is the liar like Trump claims, then how come no Republican has refuted McCabe's book? There are some seriously damaging concerns McCabe points out in the book that lead to having a SC, and yet, neither Trump or his followers have any counter arguing points that dismiss those concerns. I mean think about it, if McCabe's concerns weren't legit, why hasn't the Right explained those concerns away? Obviously McCabe and Rosenstein were spot on to inject a SC with so many indictments and guilty pleas handed over to people surrounding the Trump campaign?
And if they have no answers, then what exactly was the justification for firing McCabe?
