NO Dem. "coronation"...now 5 Dem. candidates

Perhaps you shouldn't. Our voting system could use a little less stupidity at the ballot box.

Oh come one....please.....I was looking forward so darn much to having all my dead relatives vote with me......LOL
 
You trusted Obama's "superior judgement" and look where that got you.

You're right, damn it......I look at least 7-8 years older than when Obama took office.......Must be that guy's fault.

(P.S. drop the first "e" when writing judgment......there....a freebie)
 
Perhaps you shouldn't. Our voting system could use a little less stupidity at the ballot box.

Oh come one....please.....I was looking forward so darn much to having all my dead relatives vote with me......LOL

Well, you do share one thing in common with them. Your lack of a brain. Odds are you'll still vote for Hillary. This thread? Amounts to nothing but public masturbation.
 
Still waiting for Liz Warren

Unfortunately (and strictly my opinion) Warren's gaffe about her Native heritage will always haunt her.
It got big play on Fox

Not many others cared
Nobody on the left cares about liars and opportunist's making claims in order to get rich. That's the problem with you people.
Are all your posts this inane?

You sound like Stephanie
____________

Do you actually think this is an intelligent response to the post.
Notwithstanding she is a far left loon/socialist.
Wealthy libs will allow democrat candidates to go only so far with the class envy angle. Warren's ideas regarding redistribution are predatory

Actually, "notwithstanding" the fact that you pulled that "socialist" crap out of your behind, Warren's attempt to reinstate the Glass-Steagal Act into the casino known as Wall Street is something that even right wing dingbats should cheer.
___________

It may be that we could all agree that the blatant corruption on Wall Street should be stopped in its tracts...but that would take the President, a Democrat...the Attorney General, a Democrat..the elected officials in the state of New York where most of the bitching comes from, but they are all Democrats too...just like most of the money grubbing frauds on Wall Street who ought to be in jail. They are mostly down for Bill Clinton's bogus wife who has been in their pocket for years.

So, who do you Pocahontas Lovers expect is going to do something?

Looks like we need Walker or Rubio for President; Fiorina for Vice President--and Cruz for Attorney General...New York corruption might suffer a bit from that group.
 
Well, you do share one thing in common with them. Your lack of a brain. Odds are you'll still vote for Hillary.

Actually I was hoping for a Palin-Bachmann "dream-ticket" to really stir me on...
 
You trusted Obama's "superior judgement" and look where that got you.

You're right, damn it......I look at least 7-8 years older than when Obama took office.......Must be that guy's fault.

(P.S. drop the first "e" when writing judgment......there....a freebie)

Unlike you, I bother reading dictionaries:


Variants of JUDGMENT
judg·ment or judge·ment

Judgment Definition of judgment by Merriam-Webster

(P.S. It is a classic tactic when one has no argument to correct spelling.)
 
Looks like we need Walker or Rubio for President; Fiorina for Vice President--and Cruz for Attorney General...New York corruption might suffer a bit from that group.

Were Walker to win the oval office, can we put 2 more desks in there, one each for the Koch brothers?
 
Were Walker to win the oval office, can we put 2 more desks in there, one each for the Koch brothers?

That's cute, and just how many rich lobbyists are funding Hillary right now? You'd need to rent out both houses of Congress for that, if Hillary won.

I'm thinking the Republicans have the Democrats beat for big donor funding.
 
Last edited:
Oh, and here's a big, heaping, rotting, stinking pile of facts:

dem-donations.jpg
 
I'm thinking the Republicans have the Democrats beat for big donor funding.

Then why do Democrats consistently outraise Republicans in elections? Oooops.

The only real election since Citizen's United has been 2012, which the Republicans appeared to have out-raised the Democrats in donations from wealthy donors, but it's practically impossible to tell because we have no Disclose Act passed by congress to tell who gives what to where, we only have tax records.
 
The only real election since Citizen's United has been 2012, which the Republicans appeared to have out-raised the Democrats in donations from wealthy donors, but it's practically impossible to tell because we have no Disclose Act passed by congress to tell who gives what to where, we only have tax records.

"Appeared." Look at allll that spin!

Citizens United has nothing to do with the fact that Democrats are the real bank rollers here. The facts are there, your party is full of more rich people than the Republican party.
 

Forum List

Back
Top