Now, I won't even bother to vote in 2016.
Perhaps you shouldn't. Our voting system could use a little less stupidity at the ballot box.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now, I won't even bother to vote in 2016.
My guess she's a one topic Senator, that being economics. It is her profession afterall.
Good point...Warren will make an excellent cabinet member.
Darn....I'm so glad you told me and you know how we all trust your "superior" judgment
You trusted Obama's "superior judgement" and look where that got you.
Perhaps you shouldn't. Our voting system could use a little less stupidity at the ballot box.
Oh come one....please.....I was looking forward so darn much to having all my dead relatives vote with me......LOL
____________Are all your posts this inane?Nobody on the left cares about liars and opportunist's making claims in order to get rich. That's the problem with you people.It got big play on FoxStill waiting for Liz Warren
Unfortunately (and strictly my opinion) Warren's gaffe about her Native heritage will always haunt her.
Not many others cared
You sound like Stephanie
___________Notwithstanding she is a far left loon/socialist.
Wealthy libs will allow democrat candidates to go only so far with the class envy angle. Warren's ideas regarding redistribution are predatory
Actually, "notwithstanding" the fact that you pulled that "socialist" crap out of your behind, Warren's attempt to reinstate the Glass-Steagal Act into the casino known as Wall Street is something that even right wing dingbats should cheer.
You trusted Obama's "superior judgement" and look where that got you.
You're right, damn it......I look at least 7-8 years older than when Obama took office.......Must be that guy's fault.
(P.S. drop the first "e" when writing judgment......there....a freebie)
Well, you do share one thing in common with them. Your lack of a brain. Odds are you'll still vote for Hillary.
Actually I was hoping for a Palin-Bachmann "dream-ticket" to really stir me on...
Looks like we need Walker or Rubio for President; Fiorina for Vice President--and Cruz for Attorney General...New York corruption might suffer a bit from that group.
Were Walker to win the oval office, can we put 2 more desks in there, one each for the Koch brothers?
Were Walker to win the oval office, can we put 2 more desks in there, one each for the Koch brothers?
That's cute, and just how many rich lobbyists are funding Hillary right now? You'd need to rent out both houses of Congress for that, if Hillary won.
I'm thinking the Republicans have the Democrats beat for big donor funding.
I'm thinking the Republicans have the Democrats beat for big donor funding.
Then why do Democrats consistently outraise Republicans in elections? Oooops.
Oh, and here's a big, heaping, rotting, stinking pile of facts:
The only real election since Citizen's United has been 2012, which the Republicans appeared to have out-raised the Democrats in donations from wealthy donors, but it's practically impossible to tell because we have no Disclose Act passed by congress to tell who gives what to where, we only have tax records.
Oh, and here's a big, heaping, rotting, stinking pile of facts:
That lists doesn't include Super-PAC money at all, practically exactly what we're talking about here.