"No collusion......No obstruction......Completely cleared"?????

[kyzr]

2020 will be like clubbin' baby seals. Just the ones left after the dems' circular firing squad. I'm going to enjoy every minute of the clowns dropping out one by one until election night, and then realizing Trump is president for another 4-years in spite of the MSM. deep state, and leftover never-Trumpers.

Dimwit.........Of just the THREE leading Dem. candidates......polls ALL show each of the 3 beating the orange clown.....and THAT is with a good economy and against an incumbent.

But, I sincerely "hate" to intrude on your delusion....Have another tall glass of orange kool-aid.......lol

KoolAde? Remember 2016? Watch and enjoy...

 

[Uncensored2008]

For all you libtards, here it is in simple terms. IT IS OVER! YOU LOST! You do NOT get to redo the investigation because you didn't get what you wanted. By all means keep beating the dead horse as Trump rolls to an easy re-election. And a lot of Dims get locked up for the REAL crimes committed.

The Stalinists are desperate to keep the focus on Trump. The second the focus slips from Trump, it turns on them; and unlike Trump, they are guilty.

So the trolls like gnat and the fascist media of CNN and MSNBC keep pimping lies that are fully dispelled in desperation to keep the spot light from turning on McCabe, Brennan, Strzok, Ohr, and especially, Potentate Barack Milhous Benito Obamugabe.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Nice to see you've now descended to total fantasy. "ALL" polls? Really, ask your mom to change you.

EXCEPT.....good ol' right wing Rasmussen, YES, ALL polls have YOUR orange clown losing to Biden, Sanders and Warren......the current top 3 Dem. candidates.

Look it up and take an antacid along with your kool-aid.

So, it's in the bag for Hillary, all the polls say so? No path to 270? He won't take a single state? Biggest blow out in history?

 

[Uncensored2008]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

WHY are you still whining that Hillary lost? You do realize you have at least six more years of President Trump, yes? You honestly think a lame dick like Biden or Bernie can beat him?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

BUT they're fabricating polls, and that ALWAYS WORKS....

Once the democrats and the fascist press create polls, WE MUST OBEY.... The polls are telling us who we have to vote for.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The answer to all 3 are the same...like the rest of the nation, he is tried of you whiny,

Gee, for someone who has spent one of every 5 days (20%) since in office GOLFING, why the orange moron so "tired."

(He is going to be a lot more "tired" in the next several months.......LOL)

Did you forget the subject, you fucking liar?

{For that reason, this Office's focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was
on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office
considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy?either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law - including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371 ?s offenses clause.

The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371's defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Consulting LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 38,
46 (BBC. 2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials?
or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful
function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in
Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign
official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the
Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with
conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section
IV above.}

You really are quite stupid.

 

[Uncensored2008]

WHY are you still whining that Hillary lost?

WOW........the type of "conclusion" that a 7 year old would make....Who turns on your computer, dimwit???

And yet you and your fellow Stalinist STILL REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE RESULTS OF THE 2016 ELECTION.

 

[The Purge]

 

[Uncensored2008]

Knowledgeable people read such things, it's only the terminally stupid or mentally defective who willfully choose to remain ignorant.

Why do you waste your time proving this?

These right wing, Trump ass kissers ONLY read the parts of Mueller's report that BARR has "summarized" for them........

BUT.......like the Nixon tapes......there is nothing more damning than what judge Sullivan is compelling Barr to make public, than the tape of Flynn being told to "shut-up" by Trump's attorney before testifying before Mueller..Clear and simple.....
WITNESS TAMPERING......

Izzatrite, FUCKING LIAR?


{For that reason, this Office's focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was
on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office
considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy?either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law - including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371 ?s offenses clause.

The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371's defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Consulting LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 38,
46 (BBC. 2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials?
or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful
function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in
Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign
official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the
Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with
conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section
IV above.}

You really are quite stupid.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....

So, the questions then arise as to...........

a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?

b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?

c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?

You don't get endless investigations in America. Mueller rolled snake eyes, no Collusion no Obstruction from Trump but treason and sedition on the part of the Obamaroids

Top democrats will be sentenced to a combined total of 1 million years in prison

 

[CrusaderFrank]

4 investigations, 4mil docs, 500 witness, 1000 FBI over 3 years. DJT cooperated with enough harrassment, people spent fortunes.

It's finished Jake. There is no there there.

Can you imagine if they shredded Hillary's attorney client privilege?

 

[nat4900]

For all you libtards, here it is in simple terms. IT IS OVER! YOU LOST! You do NOT get to redo the investigation because you didn't get what you wanted. By all means keep beating the dead horse as Trump rolls to an easy re-election. And a lot of Dims get locked up for the REAL crimes committed.

The Stalinists are desperate to keep the focus on Trump. The second the focus slips from Trump, it turns on them; and unlike Trump, they are guilty.

So the trolls like gnat and the fascist media of CNN and MSNBC keep pimping lies that are fully dispelled in desperation to keep the spot light from turning on McCabe, Brennan, Strzok, Ohr, and especially, Potentate Barack Milhous Benito Obamugabe.

Would an ASSHOLE like you .......AT THE VERY LEAST....learn the difference between a "Stalinist" and a "Fascist".......it s kind of annoying for you to CONSTANTLY prove on here that you're an uneducated ASSSHOILE......................LMAO

 

[Uncensored2008]

For all you libtards, here it is in simple terms. IT IS OVER! YOU LOST! You do NOT get to redo the investigation because you didn't get what you wanted. By all means keep beating the dead horse as Trump rolls to an easy re-election. And a lot of Dims get locked up for the REAL crimes committed.

The Stalinists are desperate to keep the focus on Trump. The second the focus slips from Trump, it turns on them; and unlike Trump, they are guilty.

So the trolls like gnat and the fascist media of CNN and MSNBC keep pimping lies that are fully dispelled in desperation to keep the spot light from turning on McCabe, Brennan, Strzok, Ohr, and especially, Potentate Barack Milhous Benito Obamugabe.

Would an ASSHOLE like you .......AT THE VERY LEAST....learn the difference between a "Stalinist" and a "Fascist".......it s kind of annoying for you to CONSTANTLY prove on here that you're an uneducated ASSSHOILE......................LMAO

When one contemplates whether putrid fucks like gnat are Stalinists or Fascists, the ONLY conclusion is "yes."

You really are quite stupid.

 

[easyt65]

The OP could silence everyone and prove he is right by posting the link to where the President, anyone in his family, or anyone on his team has been indicted or prosecuted for illegal collusion with the Russians or for Obstruction with the illegal FBI investigation or Mueller investigation...

Tick tock...

 

[OKTexas]

The trump LEG HUMPERS are defending their Mafia Boss....

And you fucking commies are still trying to destroy the country.
Fuck off commie.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Wow. Its over. Please seek help.

Multiple counts of obstruction is not "over."

The only reason Trump has yet to face an indictment is because he is POTUS.

That means Trump is above the law.

It is up to Congress to exercise their responsibility as a check on the executive for Trump's abuse of power.

Unless Congress does just that then Trump will continue to be 'above the law.'

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

NOTHING ??? 900 former prosecutors are on record for saying if he wasn't president he'd be in jail

There are 10's of thousands of former prosecutors, 900 never Trumpers are meaningless, you got anything meaningful to add?

.

 

[OKTexas]

Wow. Its over.

How fucking delusional BrownNose must be.........,"Its over"??? Really???? Did Hannity tell you "its over""???

Hell, the fun is just beginning......LOL

You're right, now it time for the treasonous assholes that started this fiasco to get theirs. And it all tracks to maobama and Lynch.

.

 

[basquebromance]

"demagoguery is nothing new. Trump isn't smart enough to have a new idea" - Crazy Bernie

 

[whitehall]

If someone was accused of manslaughter and a lengthily investigation with over 2,000 subpoenas and 500 witnesses proved the charge unfounded, would you assume the defendant must still be guilty of something if he was a member of a political party you hated or maybe the wrong skin color? Lefties are capable of incredible bigotry.

 

[OKTexas]

Fuck you, lying pile of shit.

This thread is about you gutter scum LYING to try and reverse the Mueller Dossier.

{For that reason, this Office?s focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was
on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office
considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy?either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law - including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371 ?s offenses clause.

The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371 ?s defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Consulting LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 38,
46 (BBC. 2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials?
or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful
function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in
Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign
official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the
Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with
conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section
IV above.}

You're just a lying little fuck, thinking that if you LIE HARDER somehow you can change the DISASTER that was the Mueller report.

Mueller's team of investigators documented the multiple abuses of power by Trump & by Trump associates.

Sorry that hurts your fragile feelings.

See, here is the thing - I've actually READ the report. I CITE the report when I make a claim. YOU just bleat what the most sleazy hate sites like DailyKOS and CNN claim.

Look at my siggy & you will see where the 10 acts of obstruction are located within the report. Pretty easy stuff

DERP

Trump called the witch hunt a "witch hunt," OBSTRUCTION

DERP

Trump fired James Comey, his subordinate who was engaged in felonies leaking classified information to the press - OBSTRUCTION.

Weissman if a petulant little fuck who could not make the case for ANY criminal acts. Anyone who reads the report sees clearly that Weissman is a butthurt little **** who failed to GET TRUMP.

Well, you said you "CITE" (sic) the report when you make a claim, then you proceed to whine that others here only "bleat sleazy hate."
Then when I pointed to the very section of the report in which the 10 acts of obstruction are contained in you come back with more of your fucking whining.
Please, just fucking go away .............

They only lawyer who counts says you're full of shit. Deal with it commie.

.

 

[Indeependent]

The voters will need to get them out...

Oh, I strongly believe that voters WILL get this scourge our of the WH...and possibly even the senate........remember, that TWENTY-TWO republican ass kissing senators will face re-election next year.)

AND, with the predicted slowing down of the economy because of tariffs, pissed off farmers, and incensed women over the attempts to eliminate SAFE abortion in some red states, all of these factors coupled with what we've seen happen in 2018 and the more astute campaigning by democrats in key swing states, will all be crucial factors in helping us get rid of this mafia-like corrupt and inept regime.

If you believed Trump was in trouble you wouldn’t need to spout off so much excessive emotional frustration.