Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That is funny, isn't it?
N.J. Mother Arrested, Guns Confiscated- By Attending Property Tax Dispute Forum - Atlanta Conservative | Examiner.com
By the way, she does not have to prove she didn't make the threat, and there is absolutely no evidence that she actually made the threat other than the claim of one person at the hearing.
You know most rape cases involved nothing more than 1 saying they did it, and another saying they didnt. Thats why we have courts and judges. To "JUDGE" the case and see if it really happened.
All thats needed for a case to go to court is probable cause, not absolute proof. Thats how the FOUNDERS set it up.
If you have a problem with how this case is being played out, then you have a problem with the justice system our Founders put into place, because this one is following that system by the book. A complaint is made, a suspect is named, probable cause exists, she is booked and given a day to be at court.
I just find it amazing that some people assume guilt when it involves someone who is politically on the right, yet assume innocence when it involves someone on the left. Me pointing out that she does not have to prove she did not make the threat should have anyone that actually believes that people should get their day in court to agree with me, and back me up 1005.
Can you explain why you didn't? Is it because this involves someone reading the Bill if Rights?
That is funny, isn't it?
N.J. Mother Arrested, Guns Confiscated- By Attending Property Tax Dispute Forum - Atlanta Conservative | Examiner.com
By the way, she does not have to prove she didn't make the threat, and there is absolutely no evidence that she actually made the threat other than the claim of one person at the hearing.
She'll get her day in court and, if she's deemed by a jury of her peers not guilty of the charge as laid, she'll be vindicated. If not, she'll be found guilty as charged.
To claim her rights have been violated before that fundamental, legal step is taken is dishonest and nothing more than emotional hyperbole.
Excuse me? Tell me something, asswipe, where did I claim her rights were fucking violated? You really should pull your head out of the governments ass and take a look around the real world, you might learn something.
99% of American constituents don't feel betrayed, if Madison and Jay and Hamilton were alive they woud join the 99% and put paid to the 1% if they acted stupidly.
Are you gonna act stupid. Hmmm
But most of the nutters will go to jail for a long time, when they act illegally. Just so.
Some will go to jail for a while yes. But once a national movement starts to mass arrest us into FEMA concentration camps, you'll get a live enactment of FEDERALIST NUMBER 28.
NJ Mother Pressured to Turn Over Her Guns, Charged With ?Terroristic Threats? After Reading the Constitution at Tax Dispute Assembly | TheBlaze.com
Apparently citing the Constitution to a government official is a terroristic threat.
Apparently the OP failed to research his post, unless it was his intent to lie.
While searching for a legitimate source for this story it was interesting to read all the different accounts, and how various rightwing blogs and websites spun, twisted, and, shall we say, embellished the incident.
Needless to say no legitimate sources were found.
There was this more objective account from what seems to be a non-partisan site:
Clayton Police and Franklin Township Police located Hart, who lives on Harding Highway in Franklin Township. She was brought back to the Clayton Police Department where she was processed and charged. She was released on her own recognizance pending court, police said.
N.J. taxpayers under the gun? Franklin woman charged after gun threats at tax meeting |
No guns confiscated, no due process violations, no arrests for reading the Constitution.
Since The Blaze is utterly devoid of credibility, the OP will need to provide the same account from a neutral, legitimate news source to be believed.
NJ Mother Pressured to Turn Over Her Guns, Charged With ?Terroristic Threats? After Reading the Constitution at Tax Dispute Assembly | TheBlaze.com
Apparently citing the Constitution to a government official is a terroristic threat.
Apparently the OP failed to research his post, unless it was his intent to lie.
While searching for a legitimate source for this story it was interesting to read all the different accounts, and how various rightwing blogs and websites spun, twisted, and, shall we say, embellished the incident.
Needless to say no legitimate sources were found.
There was this more objective account from what seems to be a non-partisan site:
Clayton Police and Franklin Township Police located Hart, who lives on Harding Highway in Franklin Township. She was brought back to the Clayton Police Department where she was processed and charged. She was released on her own recognizance pending court, police said.
N.J. taxpayers under the gun? Franklin woman charged after gun threats at tax meeting |
No guns confiscated, no due process violations, no arrests for reading the Constitution.
Since The Blaze is utterly devoid of credibility, the OP will need to provide the same account from a neutral, legitimate news source to be believed.
Apparently the OP failed to research his post, unless it was his intent to lie.
While searching for a legitimate source for this story it was interesting to read all the different accounts, and how various rightwing blogs and websites spun, twisted, and, shall we say, embellished the incident.
Needless to say no legitimate sources were found.
There was this more objective account from what seems to be a non-partisan site:
No guns confiscated, no due process violations, no arrests for reading the Constitution.
Since The Blaze is utterly devoid of credibility, the OP will need to provide the same account from a neutral, legitimate news source to be believed.
And, this post means what...exactly? What's your point, if you have one?
You know most rape cases involved nothing more than 1 saying they did it, and another saying they didnt. Thats why we have courts and judges. To "JUDGE" the case and see if it really happened.
All thats needed for a case to go to court is probable cause, not absolute proof. Thats how the FOUNDERS set it up.
If you have a problem with how this case is being played out, then you have a problem with the justice system our Founders put into place, because this one is following that system by the book. A complaint is made, a suspect is named, probable cause exists, she is booked and given a day to be at court.
I just find it amazing that some people assume guilt when it involves someone who is politically on the right, yet assume innocence when it involves someone on the left. Me pointing out that she does not have to prove she did not make the threat should have anyone that actually believes that people should get their day in court to agree with me, and back me up 1005.
Can you explain why you didn't? Is it because this involves someone reading the Bill if Rights?
Isn't it equally as funny that those on the right automatically presume she's not guilty of a damn thing so long as it involves guns? Yes, the law presumes innocence, but this isn't a court of law..it's a discussion forum.
In any case, she was NOT charged with any law relating to the reading of the Constitution. Why are you obscuring the real issue and concentrating on that immaterial sidebar?
She'll get her day in court and, if she's deemed by a jury of her peers not guilty of the charge as laid, she'll be vindicated. If not, she'll be found guilty as charged.
To claim her rights have been violated before that fundamental, legal step is taken is dishonest and nothing more than emotional hyperbole.
Excuse me? Tell me something, asswipe, where did I claim her rights were fucking violated? You really should pull your head out of the governments ass and take a look around the real world, you might learn something.
What were you claiming, then?
That is funny, isn't it?
By the way, she does not have to prove she didn't make the threat, and there is absolutely no evidence that she actually made the threat other than the claim of one person at the hearing.
Number one VIOLENT cause of death in the 20th and 21st Centuries combined:
DEMOCIDE, GOOGE IT FOLKS
Democide - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Police did the right thing.
Reactionary gun nuts, you can't frighten us, and normal America will incarcerate you or put you down if you try.
Here's OUR three-part response:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xcJT7F_BXo]2013 Epic DUBSTEP REMIX Alex Jones vs Piers Morgan [HD720p] Edit by Alex Totterdell - YouTube[/ame]
1776 will Commence Again.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_crove_5qYI]The American Revolution: The Confict Ignites Ep. 1, Part 5 - YouTube[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTqVrNkr6ug]300 Come and Get Them - YouTube[/ame]Reactionary gun nuts, you can't frighten us, and normal America will incarcerate you or put you down if you try.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdDdHMwhU2s]300 - We will Blot out the Sun. - YouTube[/ame]Reactionary gun nuts, you can't frighten us, and normal America will incarcerate you or put you down if you try.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5ut6yPrObw]The Battle of Athens: Restoring the Rule of Law - YouTube[/ame]
And, this post means what...exactly? What's your point, if you have one?
Obviously it shows that if Oblamer hadn't pushed the Newtown massacre and praised Dorner we wouldn't be having this discussion. It's Oblamer's Ideology that should be discussed and ripped apart rather than his Progressive Leftist attempts to destroy the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Obviously it shows that if Oblamer hadn't pushed the Newtown massacre and praised Dorner we wouldn't be having this discussion.
It's Oblamer's Ideology that should be discussed and ripped apart
rather than his Progressive Leftist attempts to destroy the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
NJ Mother Pressured to Turn Over Her Guns, Charged With ?Terroristic Threats? After Reading the Constitution at Tax Dispute Assembly | TheBlaze.com
Apparently citing the Constitution to a government official is a terroristic threat.
It's funny how I can only find this story from conservative blogs and news sources. I have not been able to find even a local news source that covered this story. Secondly, there is no evidence other than her word that she did not make the threat to come back with a gun. I'm not saying the story does not have merit or may not be true, but a news source other than a conservative blog would be helpful. It would be interesting to see how this turns out also. If she did make the threat, there are probably plenty of witnesses and it was probably also recorded. So if she didn't make the threat, she probably has a case for a civil suit against a lot of people and the police department.
Keep us posted on how this turns out.
NJ Mother Pressured to Turn Over Her Guns, Charged With ?Terroristic Threats? After Reading the Constitution at Tax Dispute Assembly | TheBlaze.com
Apparently citing the Constitution to a government official is a terroristic threat.
Apparently the OP failed to research his post, unless it was his intent to lie.
While searching for a legitimate source for this story it was interesting to read all the different accounts, and how various rightwing blogs and websites spun, twisted, and, shall we say, embellished the incident.
Needless to say no legitimate sources were found.
There was this more objective account from what seems to be a non-partisan site:
Clayton Police and Franklin Township Police located Hart, who lives on Harding Highway in Franklin Township. She was brought back to the Clayton Police Department where she was processed and charged. She was released on her own recognizance pending court, police said.
N.J. taxpayers under the gun? Franklin woman charged after gun threats at tax meeting |
No guns confiscated, no due process violations, no arrests for reading the Constitution.
Since The Blaze is utterly devoid of credibility, the OP will need to provide the same account from a neutral, legitimate news source to be believed.
NJ Mother Pressured to Turn Over Her Guns, Charged With ?Terroristic Threats? After Reading the Constitution at Tax Dispute Assembly | TheBlaze.com
Apparently citing the Constitution to a government official is a terroristic threat.
Apparently the OP failed to research his post, unless it was his intent to lie.
While searching for a legitimate source for this story it was interesting to read all the different accounts, and how various rightwing blogs and websites spun, twisted, and, shall we say, embellished the incident.
Needless to say no legitimate sources were found.
There was this more objective account from what seems to be a non-partisan site:
Clayton Police and Franklin Township Police located Hart, who lives on Harding Highway in Franklin Township. She was brought back to the Clayton Police Department where she was processed and charged. She was released on her own recognizance pending court, police said.
N.J. taxpayers under the gun? Franklin woman charged after gun threats at tax meeting |
No guns confiscated, no due process violations, no arrests for reading the Constitution.
Since The Blaze is utterly devoid of credibility, the OP will need to provide the same account from a neutral, legitimate news source to be believed.
