In the morning, most of us start off with coffee.... Joe starts off with Trump threads.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When a Benghaziist shows as much concern for the 4,500 who were killed looking for wmds that weren`t there as they do for the 4 (four) killed at Benghazi I may take them seriously. A private email server? BFD. If she lied to Congress why wasn`t she charged?There were 8 (eight) Benghazi investigations that produced no indictments, guilty pleas or criminal charges. See the difference?She was paid $145 million directly by parties involved in the uranium deal and they paid her $145 million.
It's called quid pro quo, simpleton. It's as good in court as having a video tape
Okay except you guys have spent millions investigating this stuff and came up with nothing...
Yes, the Obama FBI wasn't serious.
Funny how the Mueller investigation has dwarfed this, benghazi and every other investigation and found nothing, you're cheering it on.
Leftists don't have standards, you just don't. Every one of them you flip on when the party flips
It's not a "crime" to misjudge something...it's not a "crime" to mislead the families of the men who were murdered or the American people about what happened and who's to blame! That doesn't mean that what happened in Benghazi or what happened in Washington during and after the attack wasn't a disgrace. As for what SHOULD have produced indictments? The Benghazi investigations revealed Hillary Clinton's use of two private servers hidden in her house which she used to run the State Department...that she had classified materials on those servers which were not secure...that she destroyed evidence on those servers that had been requested by Congressional investigators...and that she lied to Congress repeatedly about turning over all relevant evidence regarding Benghazi!
The fact that she WASN'T indicted for what she did isn't proof of a lack of criminality on her part...it's indicative of the corruption that was rampant in the Obama Justice Department!
/——-/Benghazi actually happened,Americans died. Trump collusion is 100% fiction. Deal with itThere were 8 (eight) Benghazi investigations that produced no indictments, guilty pleas or criminal charges. See the difference?She was paid $145 million directly by parties involved in the uranium deal and they paid her $145 million.
It's called quid pro quo, simpleton. It's as good in court as having a video tape
Okay except you guys have spent millions investigating this stuff and came up with nothing...
Yes, the Obama FBI wasn't serious.
Funny how the Mueller investigation has dwarfed this, benghazi and every other investigation and found nothing, you're cheering it on.
Leftists don't have standards, you just don't. Every one of them you flip on when the party flips
This fails as a red herring fallacy; the thread is about Trump, not Clinton.View attachment 205439
In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.
The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.
But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.
So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.
If you really believe this, let's take a pact to support an actual Russia investigation which focuses on ... you know ... Russia.
We don't equate Russia with Trump without evidence and we don't block investigating things like Hillary being paid $145 million for selling 20% of US uranium reserves, Hillary buying a fake Russian dossier, Russians potentially hacking Hillary's unsecured server with secret and top secret information she put on it and the DNC refusing to cooperate with investigating their claim they were hacked by the Russians.
No holds barred, investigate RUSSIA. And go wherever it leads. I'm in, are you?
The Helsinki debacle, along with other failures and disasters, warrants Trump being voted out of office in 2020.
There were 8 (eight) Benghazi investigations that produced no indictments, guilty pleas or criminal charges. See the difference?She was paid $145 million directly by parties involved in the uranium deal and they paid her $145 million.
It's called quid pro quo, simpleton. It's as good in court as having a video tape
Okay except you guys have spent millions investigating this stuff and came up with nothing...
Yes, the Obama FBI wasn't serious.
Funny how the Mueller investigation has dwarfed this, benghazi and every other investigation and found nothing, you're cheering it on.
Leftists don't have standards, you just don't. Every one of them you flip on when the party flips
When a Benghaziist shows as much concern for the 4,500 who were killed looking for wmds that weren`t there as they do for the 4 (four) killed at Benghazi I may take them seriously. A private email server? BFD. If she lied to Congress why wasn`t she charged?There were 8 (eight) Benghazi investigations that produced no indictments, guilty pleas or criminal charges. See the difference?She was paid $145 million directly by parties involved in the uranium deal and they paid her $145 million.
It's called quid pro quo, simpleton. It's as good in court as having a video tape
Okay except you guys have spent millions investigating this stuff and came up with nothing...
Yes, the Obama FBI wasn't serious.
Funny how the Mueller investigation has dwarfed this, benghazi and every other investigation and found nothing, you're cheering it on.
Leftists don't have standards, you just don't. Every one of them you flip on when the party flips
It's not a "crime" to misjudge something...it's not a "crime" to mislead the families of the men who were murdered or the American people about what happened and who's to blame! That doesn't mean that what happened in Benghazi or what happened in Washington during and after the attack wasn't a disgrace. As for what SHOULD have produced indictments? The Benghazi investigations revealed Hillary Clinton's use of two private servers hidden in her house which she used to run the State Department...that she had classified materials on those servers which were not secure...that she destroyed evidence on those servers that had been requested by Congressional investigators...and that she lied to Congress repeatedly about turning over all relevant evidence regarding Benghazi!
The fact that she WASN'T indicted for what she did isn't proof of a lack of criminality on her part...it's indicative of the corruption that was rampant in the Obama Justice Department!
Republicans back in the 70s put country before party. Republicans today are sycophantic, castrated, little wimps who put their own self interest, greed and lust for power before the Country and the Constitution.
The Helsinki debacle, along with other failures and disasters, warrants Trump being voted out of office in 2020.
View attachment 205439
In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.
The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.
But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.
So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.
This fails as a red herring fallacy; the thread is about Trump, not Clinton.View attachment 205439
In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.
The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.
But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.
So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.
If you really believe this, let's take a pact to support an actual Russia investigation which focuses on ... you know ... Russia.
We don't equate Russia with Trump without evidence and we don't block investigating things like Hillary being paid $145 million for selling 20% of US uranium reserves, Hillary buying a fake Russian dossier, Russians potentially hacking Hillary's unsecured server with secret and top secret information she put on it and the DNC refusing to cooperate with investigating their claim they were hacked by the Russians.
No holds barred, investigate RUSSIA. And go wherever it leads. I'm in, are you?
Your failed attempt to deflect is understandable, like most on the right you lack the courage and honestly to address the topic.
"by 2024?" Get real! There's enough evidence now to get the shit stain out of office! Bigly!poor joe
don't worry joe, I'm sure you will have enough evidence to oust trump by 2024.
"by 2024?" Get real! There's enough evidence now to get the shit stain out of office! Bigly!poor joe
don't worry joe, I'm sure you will have enough evidence to oust trump by 2024.
View attachment 205439
In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.
The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.
But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.
So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.
View attachment 205439
In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.
The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.
But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.
So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.
Holy unhinged ape shit.View attachment 205439
In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.
The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.
But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.
So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.
Such as-? Do you really think you're prepared for President Pence?
#1 Pence agenda: Abortion is gone! Gone. Finito.
Do it!!!
Neither John Kerry, or anyone named Clinton invaded Iraq after Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors FAILED to find wmds in Iraq. This fiasco was the responsibility of one man and one man alone.When a Benghaziist shows as much concern for the 4,500 who were killed looking for wmds that weren`t there as they do for the 4 (four) killed at Benghazi I may take them seriously. A private email server? BFD. If she lied to Congress why wasn`t she charged?There were 8 (eight) Benghazi investigations that produced no indictments, guilty pleas or criminal charges. See the difference?Okay except you guys have spent millions investigating this stuff and came up with nothing...
Yes, the Obama FBI wasn't serious.
Funny how the Mueller investigation has dwarfed this, benghazi and every other investigation and found nothing, you're cheering it on.
Leftists don't have standards, you just don't. Every one of them you flip on when the party flips
It's not a "crime" to misjudge something...it's not a "crime" to mislead the families of the men who were murdered or the American people about what happened and who's to blame! That doesn't mean that what happened in Benghazi or what happened in Washington during and after the attack wasn't a disgrace. As for what SHOULD have produced indictments? The Benghazi investigations revealed Hillary Clinton's use of two private servers hidden in her house which she used to run the State Department...that she had classified materials on those servers which were not secure...that she destroyed evidence on those servers that had been requested by Congressional investigators...and that she lied to Congress repeatedly about turning over all relevant evidence regarding Benghazi!
The fact that she WASN'T indicted for what she did isn't proof of a lack of criminality on her part...it's indicative of the corruption that was rampant in the Obama Justice Department!
Wow, so you admit that Slick Willy, John Kerry and Hillary lied that the WMDs were in Iraq? Good job. There may be hope for you yet