Nixon was forced to resign for less!

She was paid $145 million directly by parties involved in the uranium deal and they paid her $145 million.

It's called quid pro quo, simpleton. It's as good in court as having a video tape

Okay except you guys have spent millions investigating this stuff and came up with nothing...

Yes, the Obama FBI wasn't serious.

Funny how the Mueller investigation has dwarfed this, benghazi and every other investigation and found nothing, you're cheering it on.

Leftists don't have standards, you just don't. Every one of them you flip on when the party flips
There were 8 (eight) Benghazi investigations that produced no indictments, guilty pleas or criminal charges. See the difference?

It's not a "crime" to misjudge something...it's not a "crime" to mislead the families of the men who were murdered or the American people about what happened and who's to blame! That doesn't mean that what happened in Benghazi or what happened in Washington during and after the attack wasn't a disgrace. As for what SHOULD have produced indictments? The Benghazi investigations revealed Hillary Clinton's use of two private servers hidden in her house which she used to run the State Department...that she had classified materials on those servers which were not secure...that she destroyed evidence on those servers that had been requested by Congressional investigators...and that she lied to Congress repeatedly about turning over all relevant evidence regarding Benghazi!

The fact that she WASN'T indicted for what she did isn't proof of a lack of criminality on her part...it's indicative of the corruption that was rampant in the Obama Justice Department!
When a Benghaziist shows as much concern for the 4,500 who were killed looking for wmds that weren`t there as they do for the 4 (four) killed at Benghazi I may take them seriously. A private email server? BFD. If she lied to Congress why wasn`t she charged?
 
She was paid $145 million directly by parties involved in the uranium deal and they paid her $145 million.

It's called quid pro quo, simpleton. It's as good in court as having a video tape

Okay except you guys have spent millions investigating this stuff and came up with nothing...

Yes, the Obama FBI wasn't serious.

Funny how the Mueller investigation has dwarfed this, benghazi and every other investigation and found nothing, you're cheering it on.

Leftists don't have standards, you just don't. Every one of them you flip on when the party flips
There were 8 (eight) Benghazi investigations that produced no indictments, guilty pleas or criminal charges. See the difference?
/——-/Benghazi actually happened,Americans died. Trump collusion is 100% fiction. Deal with it
 
View attachment 205439

In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.

The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.

But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.

So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.

If you really believe this, let's take a pact to support an actual Russia investigation which focuses on ... you know ... Russia.

We don't equate Russia with Trump without evidence and we don't block investigating things like Hillary being paid $145 million for selling 20% of US uranium reserves, Hillary buying a fake Russian dossier, Russians potentially hacking Hillary's unsecured server with secret and top secret information she put on it and the DNC refusing to cooperate with investigating their claim they were hacked by the Russians.

No holds barred, investigate RUSSIA. And go wherever it leads. I'm in, are you?
This fails as a red herring fallacy; the thread is about Trump, not Clinton.

Your failed attempt to deflect is understandable, like most on the right you lack the courage and honestly to address the topic.
 
The Helsinki debacle, along with other failures and disasters, warrants Trump being voted out of office in 2020.

Finally decided, huh Clayton? And you've been on the fence up until now. Wow, that's persuasive that you finally made your choice. I've been wondering when you'd decide and what you'd decide up until now
 
She was paid $145 million directly by parties involved in the uranium deal and they paid her $145 million.

It's called quid pro quo, simpleton. It's as good in court as having a video tape

Okay except you guys have spent millions investigating this stuff and came up with nothing...

Yes, the Obama FBI wasn't serious.

Funny how the Mueller investigation has dwarfed this, benghazi and every other investigation and found nothing, you're cheering it on.

Leftists don't have standards, you just don't. Every one of them you flip on when the party flips
There were 8 (eight) Benghazi investigations that produced no indictments, guilty pleas or criminal charges. See the difference?

Yes, the Benghazi investigations were a crock
 
She was paid $145 million directly by parties involved in the uranium deal and they paid her $145 million.

It's called quid pro quo, simpleton. It's as good in court as having a video tape

Okay except you guys have spent millions investigating this stuff and came up with nothing...

Yes, the Obama FBI wasn't serious.

Funny how the Mueller investigation has dwarfed this, benghazi and every other investigation and found nothing, you're cheering it on.

Leftists don't have standards, you just don't. Every one of them you flip on when the party flips
There were 8 (eight) Benghazi investigations that produced no indictments, guilty pleas or criminal charges. See the difference?

It's not a "crime" to misjudge something...it's not a "crime" to mislead the families of the men who were murdered or the American people about what happened and who's to blame! That doesn't mean that what happened in Benghazi or what happened in Washington during and after the attack wasn't a disgrace. As for what SHOULD have produced indictments? The Benghazi investigations revealed Hillary Clinton's use of two private servers hidden in her house which she used to run the State Department...that she had classified materials on those servers which were not secure...that she destroyed evidence on those servers that had been requested by Congressional investigators...and that she lied to Congress repeatedly about turning over all relevant evidence regarding Benghazi!

The fact that she WASN'T indicted for what she did isn't proof of a lack of criminality on her part...it's indicative of the corruption that was rampant in the Obama Justice Department!
When a Benghaziist shows as much concern for the 4,500 who were killed looking for wmds that weren`t there as they do for the 4 (four) killed at Benghazi I may take them seriously. A private email server? BFD. If she lied to Congress why wasn`t she charged?

Wow, so you admit that Slick Willy, John Kerry and Hillary lied that the WMDs were in Iraq? Good job. There may be hope for you yet
 
Republicans back in the 70s put country before party. Republicans today are sycophantic, castrated, little wimps who put their own self interest, greed and lust for power before the Country and the Constitution.

Do not step foot on my lawn, faggot.
 
View attachment 205439

In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.

The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.

But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.

So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.

So far, Trump has done nothing wrong. You're as delusional as the radical left.
 
View attachment 205439

In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.

The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.

But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.

So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.

If you really believe this, let's take a pact to support an actual Russia investigation which focuses on ... you know ... Russia.

We don't equate Russia with Trump without evidence and we don't block investigating things like Hillary being paid $145 million for selling 20% of US uranium reserves, Hillary buying a fake Russian dossier, Russians potentially hacking Hillary's unsecured server with secret and top secret information she put on it and the DNC refusing to cooperate with investigating their claim they were hacked by the Russians.

No holds barred, investigate RUSSIA. And go wherever it leads. I'm in, are you?
This fails as a red herring fallacy; the thread is about Trump, not Clinton.

Your failed attempt to deflect is understandable, like most on the right you lack the courage and honestly to address the topic.

Clayton the Blowhard: What does my hypocrisy have to do with this? Why does it matter that my flipping sides based on party proves this isn't really a standard to me? So? What does it have to do with the subject?

It proves you're a hypocrite and this isn't really a standard to you, which is about THIS subject, ass hat. My God you're stupid
 
View attachment 205439

In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.

The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.

But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.

So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.


There were Republican operatives involved at the H2O Gate, no Trump people at all are involved in this event. Manafort, for example, isn't accused of anything pertaining to the campaign.
 
View attachment 205439

In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.

The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.

But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.

So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.

Please, seek help.
 
View attachment 205439

In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.

The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.

But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.

So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.
Holy unhinged ape shit.

You lost. Let it go, man. Hillary is a fucking bitch who would have sucked. Be thankful.

It's over.

Quit trying to undo an election.

You lost.

It's over.

Move to the acceptance stage.

It's over.
 
Such as-? Do you really think you're prepared for President Pence?

#1 Pence agenda: Abortion is gone! Gone. Finito.

Do it!!!


If Pence became President under this kind of circumstance, he would be compelled to get his mandate passed pronto.

He is a lot more interested in banning abortion, homosexual marriage that President Trump is, I can see Executive Orders coming down pretty quickly.

And with a GOP majority on the Supreme Court, what do you think would happen?
 
Okay except you guys have spent millions investigating this stuff and came up with nothing...

Yes, the Obama FBI wasn't serious.

Funny how the Mueller investigation has dwarfed this, benghazi and every other investigation and found nothing, you're cheering it on.

Leftists don't have standards, you just don't. Every one of them you flip on when the party flips
There were 8 (eight) Benghazi investigations that produced no indictments, guilty pleas or criminal charges. See the difference?

It's not a "crime" to misjudge something...it's not a "crime" to mislead the families of the men who were murdered or the American people about what happened and who's to blame! That doesn't mean that what happened in Benghazi or what happened in Washington during and after the attack wasn't a disgrace. As for what SHOULD have produced indictments? The Benghazi investigations revealed Hillary Clinton's use of two private servers hidden in her house which she used to run the State Department...that she had classified materials on those servers which were not secure...that she destroyed evidence on those servers that had been requested by Congressional investigators...and that she lied to Congress repeatedly about turning over all relevant evidence regarding Benghazi!

The fact that she WASN'T indicted for what she did isn't proof of a lack of criminality on her part...it's indicative of the corruption that was rampant in the Obama Justice Department!
When a Benghaziist shows as much concern for the 4,500 who were killed looking for wmds that weren`t there as they do for the 4 (four) killed at Benghazi I may take them seriously. A private email server? BFD. If she lied to Congress why wasn`t she charged?

Wow, so you admit that Slick Willy, John Kerry and Hillary lied that the WMDs were in Iraq? Good job. There may be hope for you yet
Neither John Kerry, or anyone named Clinton invaded Iraq after Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors FAILED to find wmds in Iraq. This fiasco was the responsibility of one man and one man alone.
 

Forum List

Back
Top