Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 67,103
- 33,273
- 2,300
And yet oddly everything seems to be about “the Biden family”haha nope.,...there is no impeachment inquiry into Hunter Biden...geez
Generally Hunter and never Joe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And yet oddly everything seems to be about “the Biden family”haha nope.,...there is no impeachment inquiry into Hunter Biden...geez
haha it's pretty obvious you are projecting...hahahhRemarkably, you really are this stupid.
Hunter is part of the family, so yes, he certainly is a big part of it.And yet oddly everything seems to be about “the Biden family”
Generally Hunter and never Joe
If there is no evidence "yet", what does that tell you about the state of evidence now?haha it's pretty obvious you are projecting...hahahh
But he AIN’T JoeHunter is part of the family, so yes, he certainly is a big part of it.
I was just mentioning that rhetorical trick the Republicans have crafted to hoax the rubes.And yet oddly everything seems to be about “the Biden family”
Generally Hunter and never Joe
Easiest con ever. They line up to be lied to.I was just mentioning that rhetorical trick the Republicans have crafted to hoax the rubes.
"The Bidens". "The Bidens" or "the Biden family" were paid this or that by the commies, and so forth.
This deliberately gives the rubes the impression that Joe Biden is included in that phrase, and this leads them to bleev Joe Biden received money from the commies, and thus they bleev there is evidence of Joe Biden's guilt.
But in fact, when the hoaxsters say "The Bidens", they are talking about Hunter Biden and other family members, not Joe Biden.
"The Bidens" has the wonderful quality of implying Joe Biden while having an out for not actually naming Joe Biden.
This is how sick and twisted these House Republican clowns are.
Yeah...I know...not sure your point. Sammy the Bull wasn't John Gotti either...they are two different people...what's your point?But he AIN’T Joe
If there is no evidence "yet", what does that tell you about the state of evidence now?
Try again.that the GOP shouldn't impeach him yet, see where the inquiry goes. Nobody wants to see an impeachment based on parody again.
sorry, that doesn't fit your false narrative....the one you just got caught on.Try again.
If there is no evidence yet, there is no evidence now.sorry, that doesn't fit your false narrative....the one you just got caught on.
to bring formal impeachment charges...agreed. Hence why the inquiry is going on to see if anything else will be uncovered.If there is no evidence yet, there is no evidence now.
Nod.
Why are you changing the subject?The White House is under investigation, of course they have everything to do with it and the obstruction
There is plenty of evidence. The Repubs just want an ironclad case before they go to trial.If there is no evidence yet, there is no evidence now.
Nod.
I am not. I thought we were talking about obstructionWhy are you changing the subject?
We were talking about Trump.I am not. I thought we were talking about obstruction
You mean Biden is that hard to defend. You obviously can't bear to take about him.We were talking about Trump.
Sad you can’t stay on topic. I guess Trump is just that hard to defend.
Start a thread on Biden if you want. This isn’t the thread for discussing it.
I’ve talked about him in tons of threads where the topic is Biden.You mean Biden is that hard to defend. You obviously can't bear to take about him.