Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Ravi, I do believe that you hit a nerve. LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't talk about our candidates! No one should discuss any of their scandals, unethical behavior, or questionable dealings.
Best primary season ever.
Ah, well they sure have enough of them.
Did you catch Cain on that interview trying to figure out his position on Lybia and how he agrees, if he does, with Obama?
I thought he was sleeping there for a couple of minutes.
The liberal Democrat Parody ploy is crystal clear.
You idiots actually imagine that you have the right to pick the nominee of the "other" Party so that you can run the candidate of your choice against a candidate of your choice.
That's all well and good.
But when anybody calls you on what you are obviously doing -- what you are all about -- you act all outwaged!
"Those wascally Wepublicans are twying to tell us that we can't cwiticize their candidates!"
But, of course, nobody is saying any such thing.
Many of us are simply noting what you fubars are attempting to do. And we're exposing you for what you are.
I can see why that would offend you.
Do you honestly think the Democrats prefer to run against Romney, as opposed to any of these others who fall out of the clown car one by one?
Seriously?
Do you seriously believe your fraudulent little question has any meaning?
Seriously?
Romney is a GOP-lite version of a Democratic.
He might as well BE President Obama with just a few differences. Differences you guys can live with.
If, as expected, President Obama is unable to garner re-election, then it is certainly in the interest of you liberal Democratics to have a squishy-soft liberal RINO taking over. Certainly a far better outcome, from your jaundiced perspectives, than to have a person with actual conservative merit -- and juice.
Moreover, you guys -- having recognized how much in peril the Obama re-election effort is -- would DEARLY love to eek out an electoral win by putting up the one GOP candidate with the least persuasive capability to criticize "Obamacare."
Of COURSE you guys want to orchestrate things to get the GOP to put Romney in the role of GOP nominee.
Yeah, that was hysterical. He had a similar blank yesterday on our foreign policy with Cuba.Don't talk about our candidates! No one should discuss any of their scandals, unethical behavior, or questionable dealings.
Best primary season ever.
Ah, well they sure have enough of them.
Did you catch Cain on that interview trying to figure out his position on Lybia and how he agrees, if he does, with Obama?
I thought he was sleeping there for a couple of minutes.
Do you honestly think the Democrats prefer to run against Romney, as opposed to any of these others who fall out of the clown car one by one?
Seriously?
Do you seriously believe your fraudulent little question has any meaning?
Seriously?
Romney is a GOP-lite version of a Democratic.
He might as well BE President Obama with just a few differences. Differences you guys can live with.
If, as expected, President Obama is unable to garner re-election, then it is certainly in the interest of you liberal Democratics to have a squishy-soft liberal RINO taking over. Certainly a far better outcome, from your jaundiced perspectives, than to have a person with actual conservative merit -- and juice.
Moreover, you guys -- having recognized how much in peril the Obama re-election effort is -- would DEARLY love to eek out an electoral win by putting up the one GOP candidate with the least persuasive capability to criticize "Obamacare."
Of COURSE you guys want to orchestrate things to get the GOP to put Romney in the role of GOP nominee.
So Democrats want the GOP to nominate the guy most likely to be able to beat Obama because he's not a far right extremist nutcase.
Why wouldn't the Democrats prefer that one of your nutcases be nominated, that had no chance of beating Obama?
Yeah, that was hysterical. He had a similar blank yesterday on our foreign policy with Cuba.Don't talk about our candidates! No one should discuss any of their scandals, unethical behavior, or questionable dealings.
Best primary season ever.
Ah, well they sure have enough of them.
Did you catch Cain on that interview trying to figure out his position on Lybia and how he agrees, if he does, with Obama?
I thought he was sleeping there for a couple of minutes.
The guy reminds me of Sgt. Schultz: I know NOTHING, NOTHING!
Yeah, that was hysterical. He had a similar blank yesterday on our foreign policy with Cuba.Don't talk about our candidates! No one should discuss any of their scandals, unethical behavior, or questionable dealings.
Best primary season ever.
Ah, well they sure have enough of them.
Did you catch Cain on that interview trying to figure out his position on Lybia and how he agrees, if he does, with Obama?
I thought he was sleeping there for a couple of minutes.
The guy reminds me of Sgt. Schultz: I know NOTHING, NOTHING!
they dont like vetting.
Yet it was fine for their side to create out right LIES about Obama for years
Thanks for stopping by to deflect.Yeah, that was hysterical. He had a similar blank yesterday on our foreign policy with Cuba.Ah, well they sure have enough of them.
Did you catch Cain on that interview trying to figure out his position on Lybia and how he agrees, if he does, with Obama?
I thought he was sleeping there for a couple of minutes.
The guy reminds me of Sgt. Schultz: I know NOTHING, NOTHING!
I wonder if Cain has heard about the missing 8 states?
Do you seriously believe your fraudulent little question has any meaning?
Seriously?
Romney is a GOP-lite version of a Democratic.
He might as well BE President Obama with just a few differences. Differences you guys can live with.
If, as expected, President Obama is unable to garner re-election, then it is certainly in the interest of you liberal Democratics to have a squishy-soft liberal RINO taking over. Certainly a far better outcome, from your jaundiced perspectives, than to have a person with actual conservative merit -- and juice.
Moreover, you guys -- having recognized how much in peril the Obama re-election effort is -- would DEARLY love to eek out an electoral win by putting up the one GOP candidate with the least persuasive capability to criticize "Obamacare."
Of COURSE you guys want to orchestrate things to get the GOP to put Romney in the role of GOP nominee.
So Democrats want the GOP to nominate the guy most likely to be able to beat Obama because he's not a far right extremist nutcase.
Why wouldn't the Democrats prefer that one of your nutcases be nominated, that had no chance of beating Obama?
A lot of lefties want Romney so they can ratchet up the "crazy Mormon" card.
Thanks for stopping by to deflect.Yeah, that was hysterical. He had a similar blank yesterday on our foreign policy with Cuba.
The guy reminds me of Sgt. Schultz: I know NOTHING, NOTHING!
I wonder if Cain has heard about the missing 8 states?
Thanks for stopping by to deflect.I wonder if Cain has heard about the missing 8 states?
How is pointing out an Obama bumble in response to your post about a Cain bumble deflecting? Do you even know what deflect means?
Do try and keep up honey.
Do you honestly think the Democrats prefer to run against Romney, as opposed to any of these others who fall out of the clown car one by one?
Seriously?
Do you seriously believe your fraudulent little question has any meaning?
Seriously?
Romney is a GOP-lite version of a Democratic.
He might as well BE President Obama with just a few differences. Differences you guys can live with.
If, as expected, President Obama is unable to garner re-election, then it is certainly in the interest of you liberal Democratics to have a squishy-soft liberal RINO taking over. Certainly a far better outcome, from your jaundiced perspectives, than to have a person with actual conservative merit -- and juice.
Moreover, you guys -- having recognized how much in peril the Obama re-election effort is -- would DEARLY love to eek out an electoral win by putting up the one GOP candidate with the least persuasive capability to criticize "Obamacare."
Of COURSE you guys want to orchestrate things to get the GOP to put Romney in the role of GOP nominee.
So Democrats want the GOP to nominate the guy most likely to be able to beat Obama because he's not a far right extremist nutcase.
Why wouldn't the Democrats prefer that one of your nutcases be nominated, that had no chance of beating Obama?
LOL. Now Soggybrain, try to at least get the math right. 50 from 57 is 7 not 8. Yep, President Obama had a brain fart. Not the first time, will not be the last time. President Eisenhower was famous for them, and a good and great Presidetnt. President Bush was simply a complete brain fart, and will be remembered as one of the worst Presidents in our history, rivaling Buchanan for that position.
LOL. Now Soggybrain, try to at least get the math right. 50 from 57 is 7 not 8. Yep, President Obama had a brain fart. Not the first time, will not be the last time. President Eisenhower was famous for them, and a good and great Presidetnt. President Bush was simply a complete brain fart, and will be remembered as one of the worst Presidents in our history, rivaling Buchanan for that position.
Hey nut sack, 57 with one to go = 58.
Brain fart? I never had one that induced me to think there are 58 states.... Some things are pretty fucking basic. That'd be like a Christian referring to his Muslim faith... oh, wait....
Thanks for stopping by to deflect.
How is pointing out an Obama bumble in response to your post about a Cain bumble deflecting? Do you even know what deflect means?
Do try and keep up honey.
Yeah, I do know what it means and you do it well.
You could always go start your own thread but you are compelled to deflect from the OP.
Delicious, you are just proving me right.
Liability, your people will get President Obama re-elected.