New Cdz Format Rules?

[jwoodie]

1. Proposition:

2. Facts:

3. Analysis:

4. Conclusion:

I realize this would eliminate 90% of the posts on this forum, but wouldn't that be a good thing?

 

[sameech]

1. Proposition:

2. Facts:

3. Analysis:

4. Conclusion:

I realize this would eliminate 90% of the posts on this forum, but wouldn't that be a good thing?

Since you did not provide anything in your post meeting 1, 2, 3 or 4, the answer to your own question should be obvious

 

[jwoodie]

1. Proposition: CDZ should adopt this format.

2. Facts: Most CDZ posts do not contain relevant facts.

3. Analysis: Most CDZ posts do not contain logical analysis.

4. Conclusion: Your post is a good example of #1-3 above.

 

[sameech]

1. Proposition: CDZ should adopt this format.

2. Facts: Most CDZ posts do not contain relevant facts.

3. Analysis: Most CDZ posts do not contain logical analysis.

4. Conclusion: Your post is a good example of #1-3 above.

You seem to think every post should be proposing something (and you are trying to steal IRAC and call it PFAC LOL)

 

[jwoodie]

1. Proposition: CDZ should adopt this format.

2. Facts: Most CDZ posts do not contain relevant facts.

3. Analysis: Most CDZ posts do not contain logical analysis.

4. Conclusion: Your post is a good example of #1-3 above.

You seem to think every post should be proposing something (and you are trying to steal IRAC and call it PFAC LOL)

I think that every post should contribute something of value to the conversation. Yours does not.