Penrod
Rookie
Do any of you trust Iran and believe they are not working on nukes?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only in your weird, LSD-induced unicornesque RWNJ wet-dream world. Now, it's time to get back to reality, if you even can ...As confused as most libtards you are. Anyone with a brain disagrees with libtard lies. Obuthole is a disgrace.Obama has been far more a friend to Israel than either Bush or Reagan ever were. And he has also shown more level headedness in the ME than Bill Clinton did.Libtards embarrassed because Netanyahu makes obuthole look like a choir boy, not hard to do, obuthole is an embarrassment.When it comes to Iran and its nuclear program, Netanyahu is simply not a credible source. On no less than five separate occasions since 1992, he has warned that Iran was imminently within reach of a nuclear bomb, warnings that he has used to argue for a preemptive American strike. Each time his projected window ran out, he simply moved the date forward a couple years. Like the Friedman Unit during the Iraq War, Netanyahu has claimed that Iran is between one and seven years away from a nuclear weapon — for the past 23 years running.
The sky isn t falling Why Benjamin Netanyahu has no credibility on the Iranian threat
.
Obama has repeatedly shown patience and a reluctance to overreact to the rightwing issue of the day
Remember Ebola?
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Or put up with neighbors who kidnap and kill your people while lobbing small missiles at you and then imagine a BIG ONE coming at you. And that government has threatened to do so for many years.Shrink the entire US down to the size of NJ, and place a majority of your population in an area the size of New York City and then think how concerned you would be about an enemy having nukes.
Obama has been far more a friend to Israel than either Bush or Reagan ever were. And he has also shown more level headedness in the ME than Bill Clinton did.Libtards embarrassed because Netanyahu makes obuthole look like a choir boy, not hard to do, obuthole is an embarrassment.When it comes to Iran and its nuclear program, Netanyahu is simply not a credible source. On no less than five separate occasions since 1992, he has warned that Iran was imminently within reach of a nuclear bomb, warnings that he has used to argue for a preemptive American strike. Each time his projected window ran out, he simply moved the date forward a couple years. Like the Friedman Unit during the Iraq War, Netanyahu has claimed that Iran is between one and seven years away from a nuclear weapon — for the past 23 years running.
The sky isn t falling Why Benjamin Netanyahu has no credibility on the Iranian threat
.
Obama has repeatedly shown patience and a reluctance to overreact to the rightwing issue of the day
Remember Ebola?
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Only in your weird, LSD-induced unicornesque RWNJ wet-dream world. Now, it's time to get back to reality, if you even can ...As confused as most libtards you are. Anyone with a brain disagrees with libtard lies. Obuthole is a disgrace.Obama has been far more a friend to Israel than either Bush or Reagan ever were. And he has also shown more level headedness in the ME than Bill Clinton did.Libtards embarrassed because Netanyahu makes obuthole look like a choir boy, not hard to do, obuthole is an embarrassment.When it comes to Iran and its nuclear program, Netanyahu is simply not a credible source. On no less than five separate occasions since 1992, he has warned that Iran was imminently within reach of a nuclear bomb, warnings that he has used to argue for a preemptive American strike. Each time his projected window ran out, he simply moved the date forward a couple years. Like the Friedman Unit during the Iraq War, Netanyahu has claimed that Iran is between one and seven years away from a nuclear weapon — for the past 23 years running.
The sky isn t falling Why Benjamin Netanyahu has no credibility on the Iranian threat
.
Obama has repeatedly shown patience and a reluctance to overreact to the rightwing issue of the day
Remember Ebola?
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Yes, indeed, I think that what you just wrote has some validity and is also important to note. But Iran also does not border on Eretz Yisrael. That being said, one of its proxies does.Or put up with neighbors who kidnap and kill your people while lobbing small missiles at you and then imagine a BIG ONE coming at you. And that government has threatened to do so for many years.Shrink the entire US down to the size of NJ, and place a majority of your population in an area the size of New York City and then think how concerned you would be about an enemy having nukes.
Americans suffer under the "two oceans of protections" idea. The last time we had a hostile border that wasn't american vs. american was in the early 1800's (I really don't count the Poncho Villa raids, but some people do). We don't understand the concept of having bad guys just on the other side of a river or an imaginary line.
So why are they if they are so cognizant of the "glassy" future do they want nuclear fuel?Yes, indeed, I think that what you just wrote has some validity and is also important to note. But Iran also does not border on Eretz Yisrael. That being said, one of its proxies does.Or put up with neighbors who kidnap and kill your people while lobbing small missiles at you and then imagine a BIG ONE coming at you. And that government has threatened to do so for many years.Shrink the entire US down to the size of NJ, and place a majority of your population in an area the size of New York City and then think how concerned you would be about an enemy having nukes.
Americans suffer under the "two oceans of protections" idea. The last time we had a hostile border that wasn't american vs. american was in the early 1800's (I really don't count the Poncho Villa raids, but some people do). We don't understand the concept of having bad guys just on the other side of a river or an imaginary line.
The key point is that even the craziest of the crazies in Iran already know that the launching of just one nuclear missile at any time in the future would guarantee the complete annihilation of Iran, that Teheran and Ispahan would be turned into glass that very same day, and with nuclear armaments that make Hiroshima and Nagasaki look like child's play. The Iranians know this. The specter of MAND keeps them from being stupid.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Because they see having to buy enriched uranium from the west is further holding them down by western politics. They believe they are to be the rulers of the world and all shall bow to them.So why are they if they are so cognizant of the "glassy" future do they want nuclear fuel?Yes, indeed, I think that what you just wrote has some validity and is also important to note. But Iran also does not border on Eretz Yisrael. That being said, one of its proxies does.Or put up with neighbors who kidnap and kill your people while lobbing small missiles at you and then imagine a BIG ONE coming at you. And that government has threatened to do so for many years.Shrink the entire US down to the size of NJ, and place a majority of your population in an area the size of New York City and then think how concerned you would be about an enemy having nukes.
Americans suffer under the "two oceans of protections" idea. The last time we had a hostile border that wasn't american vs. american was in the early 1800's (I really don't count the Poncho Villa raids, but some people do). We don't understand the concept of having bad guys just on the other side of a river or an imaginary line.
The key point is that even the craziest of the crazies in Iran already know that the launching of just one nuclear missile at any time in the future would guarantee the complete annihilation of Iran, that Teheran and Ispahan would be turned into glass that very same day, and with nuclear armaments that make Hiroshima and Nagasaki look like child's play. The Iranians know this. The specter of MAND keeps them from being stupid.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
More importantly why doesn't this administration FORCE Iran to use solar instead of nuclear?
Yes, we actually still have a few liberal fanatics who believe that since Iran hasn't actually nuked anybody yet, they won't. And so we shouldn't worry about them getting the Bomb.Israel has nukes....Iran doesn't
Who needs to be afraid?
Yes, indeed, I think that what you just wrote has some validity and is also important to note. But Iran also does not border on Eretz Yisrael. That being said, one of its proxies does.Or put up with neighbors who kidnap and kill your people while lobbing small missiles at you and then imagine a BIG ONE coming at you. And that government has threatened to do so for many years.Shrink the entire US down to the size of NJ, and place a majority of your population in an area the size of New York City and then think how concerned you would be about an enemy having nukes.
Americans suffer under the "two oceans of protections" idea. The last time we had a hostile border that wasn't american vs. american was in the early 1800's (I really don't count the Poncho Villa raids, but some people do). We don't understand the concept of having bad guys just on the other side of a river or an imaginary line.
The key point is that even the craziest of the crazies in Iran already know that the launching of just one nuclear missile at any time in the future would guarantee the complete annihilation of Iran, that Teheran and Ispahan would be turned into glass that very same day, and with nuclear armaments that make Hiroshima and Nagasaki look like child's play. The Iranians know this. The specter of MAND keeps them from being stupid.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Because nuclear power for civil use is not the same as nuclear weaponry. Heavy Water 101, dude. Germany has nuclear reactors but no nuclear weapons. Ditto Italy. Ditto the baltic states. Ditto Japan.So why are they if they are so cognizant of the "glassy" future do they want nuclear fuel?Yes, indeed, I think that what you just wrote has some validity and is also important to note. But Iran also does not border on Eretz Yisrael. That being said, one of its proxies does.Or put up with neighbors who kidnap and kill your people while lobbing small missiles at you and then imagine a BIG ONE coming at you. And that government has threatened to do so for many years.Shrink the entire US down to the size of NJ, and place a majority of your population in an area the size of New York City and then think how concerned you would be about an enemy having nukes.
Americans suffer under the "two oceans of protections" idea. The last time we had a hostile border that wasn't american vs. american was in the early 1800's (I really don't count the Poncho Villa raids, but some people do). We don't understand the concept of having bad guys just on the other side of a river or an imaginary line.
The key point is that even the craziest of the crazies in Iran already know that the launching of just one nuclear missile at any time in the future would guarantee the complete annihilation of Iran, that Teheran and Ispahan would be turned into glass that very same day, and with nuclear armaments that make Hiroshima and Nagasaki look like child's play. The Iranians know this. The specter of MAND keeps them from being stupid.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
More importantly why doesn't this administration FORCE Iran to use solar instead of nuclear?
Righties? I agree.They don't think straight...They're mad crazy people.
Yes, indeed, I think that what you just wrote has some validity and is also important to note. But Iran also does not border on Eretz Yisrael. That being said, one of its proxies does.Or put up with neighbors who kidnap and kill your people while lobbing small missiles at you and then imagine a BIG ONE coming at you. And that government has threatened to do so for many years.Shrink the entire US down to the size of NJ, and place a majority of your population in an area the size of New York City and then think how concerned you would be about an enemy having nukes.
Americans suffer under the "two oceans of protections" idea. The last time we had a hostile border that wasn't american vs. american was in the early 1800's (I really don't count the Poncho Villa raids, but some people do). We don't understand the concept of having bad guys just on the other side of a river or an imaginary line.
The key point is that even the craziest of the crazies in Iran already know that the launching of just one nuclear missile at any time in the future would guarantee the complete annihilation of Iran, that Teheran and Ispahan would be turned into glass that very same day, and with nuclear armaments that make Hiroshima and Nagasaki look like child's play. The Iranians know this. The specter of MAND keeps them from being stupid.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Again you are assuming that they are thinking along the same lines you are. You ignore that history is full of people making bad decisions, using logic they though was sound. The Japanese decision to start the Pacific War is a shining example of this. The Japanese were not going into it thinking they would lose, they expected a quick war along the concept of the "one big battle."
More recently you can look at Saddam' Hussien's invasion of Kuiwait. Do you think he did it knowing the US would respond the way it did?
The small size of Israel and its population density could lead Iran to think it could get away with a 1st strike. Iran's more spread out population could lead it to think it could weather any response, or that the rest of the world would stop Israel from retaliating.
You're only on this site to agitate people. Your comments mean nothing.Righties? I agree.They don't think straight...They're mad crazy people.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Only in your weird, LSD-induced unicornesque RWNJ wet-dream world.
From the article you linked:What are the reasons???
There are a number of reasons that Iran wants a nuclear program and has taken steps toward a nuclear bomb. Some of those reasons are rational and others are not. All of them are concerning. But a desire to launch an offensive strike against Israel, or the US, is not one of them.
No Netanyahu Iran is not secretly planning to nuke Israel - Vox