Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol!Only in your weird, LSD-induced unicornesque RWNJ wet-dream world.
An Insult to Acid Heads everywhere.
Because nuclear power for civil use is not the same as nuclear weaponry. Heavy Water 101, dude. Germany has nuclear reactors but no nuclear weapons. Ditto Italy. Ditto the baltic states. Ditto Japan.So why are they if they are so cognizant of the "glassy" future do they want nuclear fuel?Yes, indeed, I think that what you just wrote has some validity and is also important to note. But Iran also does not border on Eretz Yisrael. That being said, one of its proxies does.Or put up with neighbors who kidnap and kill your people while lobbing small missiles at you and then imagine a BIG ONE coming at you. And that government has threatened to do so for many years.Shrink the entire US down to the size of NJ, and place a majority of your population in an area the size of New York City and then think how concerned you would be about an enemy having nukes.
Americans suffer under the "two oceans of protections" idea. The last time we had a hostile border that wasn't american vs. american was in the early 1800's (I really don't count the Poncho Villa raids, but some people do). We don't understand the concept of having bad guys just on the other side of a river or an imaginary line.
The key point is that even the craziest of the crazies in Iran already know that the launching of just one nuclear missile at any time in the future would guarantee the complete annihilation of Iran, that Teheran and Ispahan would be turned into glass that very same day, and with nuclear armaments that make Hiroshima and Nagasaki look like child's play. The Iranians know this. The specter of MAND keeps them from being stupid.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
More importantly why doesn't this administration FORCE Iran to use solar instead of nuclear?
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Because nuclear power for civil use is not the same as nuclear weaponry. Heavy Water 101, dude. Germany has nuclear reactors but no nuclear weapons. Ditto Italy. Ditto the baltic states. Ditto Japan.So why are they if they are so cognizant of the "glassy" future do they want nuclear fuel?Yes, indeed, I think that what you just wrote has some validity and is also important to note. But Iran also does not border on Eretz Yisrael. That being said, one of its proxies does.Or put up with neighbors who kidnap and kill your people while lobbing small missiles at you and then imagine a BIG ONE coming at you. And that government has threatened to do so for many years.Shrink the entire US down to the size of NJ, and place a majority of your population in an area the size of New York City and then think how concerned you would be about an enemy having nukes.
Americans suffer under the "two oceans of protections" idea. The last time we had a hostile border that wasn't american vs. american was in the early 1800's (I really don't count the Poncho Villa raids, but some people do). We don't understand the concept of having bad guys just on the other side of a river or an imaginary line.
The key point is that even the craziest of the crazies in Iran already know that the launching of just one nuclear missile at any time in the future would guarantee the complete annihilation of Iran, that Teheran and Ispahan would be turned into glass that very same day, and with nuclear armaments that make Hiroshima and Nagasaki look like child's play. The Iranians know this. The specter of MAND keeps them from being stupid.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
More importantly why doesn't this administration FORCE Iran to use solar instead of nuclear?
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Yes, we actually still have a few liberal fanatics who believe that since Iran hasn't actually nuked anybody yet, they won't. And so we shouldn't worry about them getting the Bomb.Israel has nukes....Iran doesn't
Who needs to be afraid?
In a related announcement, these same liberal fanatics announced to day that a child who has set numerous brush fires over the last few years, and who boasts of wanting to make a really big bang, should nonetheless be trusted with matches in the powder magazine of a giant battleship. On grounds that since he hasn't actually blown up any battleships yet, he won't. And so we shouldn't worry about that particular child having matches in a powder magazine.
Can anybody possibly be as completely blind and obtuse as little rightwinger?
Why should any country limit itself to oil only?Because nuclear power for civil use is not the same as nuclear weaponry. Heavy Water 101, dude. Germany has nuclear reactors but no nuclear weapons. Ditto Italy. Ditto the baltic states. Ditto Japan.So why are they if they are so cognizant of the "glassy" future do they want nuclear fuel?Yes, indeed, I think that what you just wrote has some validity and is also important to note. But Iran also does not border on Eretz Yisrael. That being said, one of its proxies does.Or put up with neighbors who kidnap and kill your people while lobbing small missiles at you and then imagine a BIG ONE coming at you. And that government has threatened to do so for many years.
Americans suffer under the "two oceans of protections" idea. The last time we had a hostile border that wasn't american vs. american was in the early 1800's (I really don't count the Poncho Villa raids, but some people do). We don't understand the concept of having bad guys just on the other side of a river or an imaginary line.
The key point is that even the craziest of the crazies in Iran already know that the launching of just one nuclear missile at any time in the future would guarantee the complete annihilation of Iran, that Teheran and Ispahan would be turned into glass that very same day, and with nuclear armaments that make Hiroshima and Nagasaki look like child's play. The Iranians know this. The specter of MAND keeps them from being stupid.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
More importantly why doesn't this administration FORCE Iran to use solar instead of nuclear?
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Ditto Canada, ditto Mexico, ditto about 30 other Countries.
Why does a Country with the world's 3rd largest known oil reserves need so much Nuclear Power?
In Millions of Barrels
1Venezuela (see: Oil reserves in Venezuela) 298,350
2Saudi Arabia (see: Oil reserves in Saudi Arabia) 268,350[2]
3Iran (see: Oil reserves in Iran) 173,625 - 175,200
Were you born stupid or did you have to go to College to get that way?
I personally find that argument to be weak. Exactly who is threatening Iran?Yes, we actually still have a few liberal fanatics who believe that since Iran hasn't actually nuked anybody yet, they won't. And so we shouldn't worry about them getting the Bomb.Israel has nukes....Iran doesn't
Who needs to be afraid?
In a related announcement, these same liberal fanatics announced to day that a child who has set numerous brush fires over the last few years, and who boasts of wanting to make a really big bang, should nonetheless be trusted with matches in the powder magazine of a giant battleship. On grounds that since he hasn't actually blown up any battleships yet, he won't. And so we shouldn't worry about that particular child having matches in a powder magazine.
Can anybody possibly be as completely blind and obtuse as little rightwinger?
What it comes down to is that right now, it is Iran who feels threatened and Iran who feels they need to develop a nuclear weapon to ballance that threat
Negotiations with the west revolve around assuring Iran that they do not need a nuclear weapon for security and that they will be protected
Sabre rattling by Netanyahu does not help
Why should any country limit itself to oil only?
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
When it comes to Iran and its nuclear program, Netanyahu is simply not a credible source. On no less than five separate occasions since 1992, he has warned that Iran was imminently within reach of a nuclear bomb, warnings that he has used to argue for a preemptive American strike. Each time his projected window ran out, he simply moved the date forward a couple years. Like the Friedman Unit during the Iraq War, Netanyahu has claimed that Iran is between one and seven years away from a nuclear weapon — for the past 23 years running.
The sky isn t falling Why Benjamin Netanyahu has no credibility on the Iranian threat
.
Yes, we actually still have a few liberal fanatics who believe that since Iran hasn't actually nuked anybody yet, they won't. And so we shouldn't worry about them getting the Bomb. Never mind that they have fomented and financed countless acts of terror that resulted in the deaths of thousands; and have announced numerous times that they want to wipe Israel off the map.Israel has nukes....Iran doesn't
Who needs to be afraid?
Man he went all out and spared no expense for graphics...
It will be black hole medium then..Revelation Chapter 20 Verse 3 Let's hope when Satan gets loose it's not nuclear.
You seem angry. Try butthurt creme, it might help.Why should any country limit itself to oil only?
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Not 'any'
Just the ones whose founding documents pledge jihad and the destruction of a neighboring peaceful Country.
You really are stupid.... gotta be a College graduate
Most recently, he predicted before the U.N. General Assembly (complete with a bizarre Wile E. Coyote-style bomb diagram) that Iran would have a nuke by the summer of 2013 at the latest. But Al Jazeera recently reported that this assertion was completely at odds with the contemporaneous opinion of Mossad, Israel's foreign intelligence service.
It's worth noting that Netanyahu did the exact same song and dance before the Iraq War, too, testifying before Congress that "there is no question whatsoever" that Saddam Hussein was working on nuclear weapons and that he would thus pose an existential threat to Israel and world security.
Russia said the same about the USA and they had nukes.....Oh, give it a rest. Iran has stated it will wipe Israel from the face of the earth. If he's a little paranoid it's with good reason. And who's to say when Iran will do what? Maybe they already have nukes and are just working on a method of deployment. We should have taken out Iran back in the 80's.
When has any leader appeared before another congress in an attempt to take over that country's leadership? Disgusting.
It Iran who has been threatening Israel for at least decadesYes, we actually still have a few liberal fanatics who believe that since Iran hasn't actually nuked anybody yet, they won't. And so we shouldn't worry about them getting the Bomb.Israel has nukes....Iran doesn't
Who needs to be afraid?
In a related announcement, these same liberal fanatics announced to day that a child who has set numerous brush fires over the last few years, and who boasts of wanting to make a really big bang, should nonetheless be trusted with matches in the powder magazine of a giant battleship. On grounds that since he hasn't actually blown up any battleships yet, he won't. And so we shouldn't worry about that particular child having matches in a powder magazine.
Can anybody possibly be as completely blind and obtuse as little rightwinger?
What it comes down to is that right now, it is Iran who feels threatened and Iran who feels they need to develop a nuclear weapon to ballance that threat
Negotiations with the west revolve around assuring Iran that they do not need a nuclear weapon for security and that they will be protected
Sabre rattling by Netanyahu does not help
[
You seem angry. Try butthurt creme, it might help.