Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So, you're unable or unwilling to admit the fact that Obamacare is simply a bad law.
Are you unable or unwilling to accept the fact that a overhaul of this magnitude can't happen overnight? How fast should health exchanges be set up? In your expert opinion.
Then why write a single law that essentially did just that? Why are you defending something you just admitted is impossible?
LOL, yeah buying votes.Like I said, this is not some sort of conspiracy.
I wouldn't care if Bush or anyone did this, as I'm not a conspiracy theorist who automatically assume that my own president is out to get me. Give it a rest.
Wtf are you talking about, conspiracy? Is this your dumb shit way of staying out of touch with reality?
You think that Obama is buying votes by granting waivers. That sir is a full blown and ridiculous conspiracy theory.
I am surprised these right wing ideologues would want to post this stuff, because once you get to the bottom of it, you see why this bill was needed. It shines a bright light on the scurrilous insurance cartels who they worship. They will never understand that there is a built in conflict between health care and for profit insurance. Health care will never fit a 'free market' model. The best that can be crafted is laws that limit the cartel's death panels...Insurance cartels are not in the health care business. They are in the profit business, and the best way to increase profit is to collect premiums and find ways NOT to pay claims.
Hey, RDD, I'm logging off now to do some stuff. You make sure you bow up and tell everyone how you scared off the mean ol' conservative.
And still no proof before you go. Shocking!
Yes, how rude of me to not post evidence of a claim I didn't make.Thanks for posting. Nowhere in there does she even hint that this would be a implemented overnight, like Daveman is suggesting. Hence why he refuses to post any evidence...because it doesn't exist.
Hey, RDD, I'm logging off now to do some stuff. You make sure you bow up and tell everyone how you scared off the mean ol' conservative.
And still no proof before you go. Shocking!
And I never said Obamacare would be implemented overnight. No, really! But awesome strawman building on your part.
The law was rushed through. Badly. Pelosi said, "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy."
Horseshit. We have to debate the bill and understand what's in it BEFORE it becomes law.
Now, thanks to the utter incompetence of Democrats, we have to fix a lot of stuff.
Yes, it's impossible for it to happen overnight. So why did Democrats insist it had to?Are you unable or unwilling to accept the fact that a overhaul of this magnitude can't happen overnight? How fast should health exchanges be set up? In your expert opinion.
Democrats screwed up healthcare reform, and you're mad at me.
They are mad at us because we insist on telling them the truth. I agree with Christie, get mad at the people who lied to you, not the one telling you the truth for the first time in your life.
Repeal would be the best fix of all.And still no proof before you go. Shocking!
And I never said Obamacare would be implemented overnight. No, really! But awesome strawman building on your part.
The law was rushed through. Badly. Pelosi said, "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy."
Horseshit. We have to debate the bill and understand what's in it BEFORE it becomes law.
Now, thanks to the utter incompetence of Democrats, we have to fix a lot of stuff.
Fix my ass....... straight up de-funded and repealed I really have no desire to wait for months to go see the Doc when I need one
Hey, RDD, I'm logging off now to do some stuff. You make sure you bow up and tell everyone how you scared off the mean ol' conservative.
And still no proof before you go. Shocking!
And I never said Obamacare would be implemented overnight. No, really! But awesome strawman building on your part.
The law was rushed through. Badly. Pelosi said, "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy."
Horseshit. We have to debate the bill and understand what's in it BEFORE it becomes law.
Now, thanks to the utter incompetence of Democrats, we have to fix a lot of stuff.
And still no proof before you go. Shocking!
And I never said Obamacare would be implemented overnight. No, really! But awesome strawman building on your part.
The law was rushed through. Badly. Pelosi said, "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy."
Horseshit. We have to debate the bill and understand what's in it BEFORE it becomes law.
Now, thanks to the utter incompetence of Democrats, we have to fix a lot of stuff.
Oops, now you're a liar too. Solid back peddle though when you couldn't prove the horse shit you were dishing out.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/167677-nearly-1-in-5-obamacare-waivers-go-to-restaurants-nightclubs-hotels-in-pelosi-6.html#post3653300
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/167677-nearly-1-in-5-obamacare-waivers-go-to-restaurants-nightclubs-hotels-in-pelosi-6.html#post3653324
I am surprised these right wing ideologues would want to post this stuff, because once you get to the bottom of it, you see why this bill was needed. It shines a bright light on the scurrilous insurance cartels who they worship. They will never understand that there is a built in conflict between health care and for profit insurance. Health care will never fit a 'free market' model. The best that can be crafted is laws that limit the cartel's death panels...Insurance cartels are not in the health care business. They are in the profit business, and the best way to increase profit is to collect premiums and find ways NOT to pay claims.
Nearly 1 in 5 Obamacare waivers go to restaurants, nightclubs, hotels in Pelosi
But, of the 204 waivers the administration approved in April, 38 of them, or about 20 percent, were for businesses in Pelosi’s district.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney downplayed the significance of the administration’s approval of Obamacare waivers amid the uproar over 38 Obamacare waivers luxurious hotels, gourmet restaurants, hip nightclubs, day spas and four-star hotels received in April in House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s district.
In the Tuesday press briefing, he said the administration has approved more than 1,300 waivers from the health care law’s requirements, and has rejected less than 100 waiver-applications. The total of approved waivers “is not that much,” he said, adding that the temporary waivers were granted to organizations that offer their employees relatively cheap insurance coverage, dubbed “mini-med” insurance.
Nearly 1 in 5 Obamacare waivers go to restaurants, nightclubs, hotels in Pelosi
Sorry but that's not even true. Only 38 of 1300 waiver have gone to her district.
White House, Pelosi: Obamacare waivers a regular thing, we
Nearly 1 in 5 Obamacare waivers go to restaurants, nightclubs, hotels in Pelosi
Sorry but that's not even true. Only 38 of 1300 waiver have gone to her district.
White House, Pelosi: Obamacare waivers a regular thing, we
Still.....38 in her one district is still incredibly high. Just sayin....
Sorry but that's not even true. Only 38 of 1300 waiver have gone to her district.
White House, Pelosi: Obamacare waivers a regular thing, we
Still.....38 in her one district is still incredibly high. Just sayin....
38 out of 1300? No it isn't! Now you're being ridiculous.
Sorry but that's not even true. Only 38 of 1300 waiver have gone to her district.
White House, Pelosi: Obamacare waivers a regular thing, we
Still.....38 in her one district is still incredibly high. Just sayin....
38 out of 1300? No it isn't! Now you're being ridiculous.
Still.....38 in her one district is still incredibly high. Just sayin....
38 out of 1300? No it isn't! Now you're being ridiculous.
It is high, actually.
1300 waivers divided by 435 Representatives = 2.99 waiver per Representative. 38 is an awful lot of apologies for making her district look like buffoons for re-electing her.
The San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance (HCSO) requires medium and large-sized employers to spend a minimum amount per hour on healthcare for their employees who work in San Francisco. http://www.healthysanfrancisco.org/employers/HCSO_Compliance.aspx
In actuality, Aitken explained, the high percentage of waivers is the byproduct of local law rubbing against the new national legislation. In April 2008, San Francisco passed an ordinance requiring employers to spend a minimum amount per hour on health care for their employees who work in the city. In response, a number of eateries chose to set up Health Reimbursement Arrangements, which are essentially pools of funds set aside by employers to reimburse medical expenses paid by employees...
38 out of 1300? No it isn't! Now you're being ridiculous.
It is high, actually.
1300 waivers divided by 435 Representatives = 2.99 waiver per Representative. 38 is an awful lot of apologies for making her district look like buffoons for re-electing her.
This might come as surprise to you, but House districts aren't divided into districts having roughly equal numbers of restaurants, night clubs, and hotels which offer mini-medical plans- they're divided into districts having roughly equal numbers of people.
It is high, actually.
1300 waivers divided by 435 Representatives = 2.99 waiver per Representative. 38 is an awful lot of apologies for making her district look like buffoons for re-electing her.
This might come as surprise to you, but House districts aren't divided into districts having roughly equal numbers of restaurants, night clubs, and hotels which offer mini-medical plans- they're divided into districts having roughly equal numbers of people.
No, no surprise to me. But you don't see even a little bit of shenanigans here? Really?
This might come as surprise to you, but House districts aren't divided into districts having roughly equal numbers of restaurants, night clubs, and hotels which offer mini-medical plans- they're divided into districts having roughly equal numbers of people.
No, no surprise to me. But you don't see even a little bit of shenanigans here? Really?
More employers have to apply for waivers in San Francisco because more employers provide health care to their employees because they are required to by city law. Read above post. There's no Shenanigans, its just more right wing conspiracy nut bullshit.
