Napolitano: Trump first President to confront deep state

[MindWars]

Napolitano: Trump First President to Confront Deep State

Judge Andrew Napolitano praised Donald Trump as the first president to challenge the mysterious, controlling ‘deep state’ in the modern American era.

Shadow government desperate to destroy uncompromised 'People's President'
=========================================================

It's funny how many lefties won't listen to even a Judge as he tries tell ppl what is going on.

 

[Votto]

Napolitano: Trump First President to Confront Deep State

Judge Andrew Napolitano praised Donald Trump as the first president to challenge the mysterious, controlling ‘deep state’ in the modern American era.
View attachment 115893



Shadow government desperate to destroy uncompromised 'People's President'
=========================================================

It's funny how many lefties won't listen to even a Judge as he tries tell ppl what is going on.

Trump is the first President to confront the deep state?

You do remember JFK, right?

 

[MACAULAY]

Napolitano: Trump First President to Confront Deep State

Judge Andrew Napolitano praised Donald Trump as the first president to challenge the mysterious, controlling ‘deep state’ in the modern American era.
View attachment 115893



Shadow government desperate to destroy uncompromised 'People's President'
=========================================================

It's funny how many lefties won't listen to even a Judge as he tries tell ppl what is going on.

Trump is the first President to confront the deep state?

You do remember JFK, right?

_____________

You mean the JFK who said:

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."

He would get run out of today's Democratic Party. They would have him say:

"From each according to his ability to each according to his need".

______________

 

[B. Kidd]

Deep State been running the country since 2001

America, I hardly know ye' anymore!

 

[BULLDOG]

Sure, he said that, and he looked mighty fine in his tinfoil hat when he did it.

 

[MindWars]

Napolitano: Trump First President to Confront Deep State

Judge Andrew Napolitano praised Donald Trump as the first president to challenge the mysterious, controlling ‘deep state’ in the modern American era.
View attachment 115893



Shadow government desperate to destroy uncompromised 'People's President'
=========================================================

It's funny how many lefties won't listen to even a Judge as he tries tell ppl what is going on.

Trump is the first President to confront the deep state?

You do remember JFK, right?

But see it like this It's been that long since ppl realized what a good President was, we see what happened to JFK too. The same fears are headed towards Trump already.

When JFK wanted to rip us from this NWO that long ago we weren't anywhere near the completion of becoming a NWO now that we are Trump is literally the first President taking it on ( again) and we are in a hell of a lot worse situation now compared to back then.

 

[rightwinger]

How deep is it?

 

[Votto]

Napolitano: Trump First President to Confront Deep State

Judge Andrew Napolitano praised Donald Trump as the first president to challenge the mysterious, controlling ‘deep state’ in the modern American era.
View attachment 115893



Shadow government desperate to destroy uncompromised 'People's President'
=========================================================

It's funny how many lefties won't listen to even a Judge as he tries tell ppl what is going on.

Trump is the first President to confront the deep state?

You do remember JFK, right?

_____________

You mean the JFK who said:

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."

He would get run out of today's Democratic Party. They would have him say:

"From each according to his ability to each according to his need".

______________

''
Write an Executive Order to do away with the Fed and the next thing you know you are pushing lilies.

 

[Votto]

How deep is it?

Deep, and wide, deep and wide, it's a fountain flowing deep and wide.

 

[rightwinger]

Trump first President to confront deep state

Which state is the deepest? I live in NJ

It does not seem that deep

 

[Dragonlady]

The White House has been taken over by the tinfoil hat conspiracy theory guys.

The President gets his "news" from Breitbart, foreign policy from InfoWars, and doesn't read security briefings.

It's like bad reality TV. You can't believe it can get worse, and then, it does.

I haven't enjoyed watching a President lose his mind so much since Tricky Dicky.

Unlike Nixon, Trump will never resign.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[TNHarley]

Trump first President to confront deep state

Which state is the deepest? I live in NJ

It does not seem that deep

shit floats homie

 

[BULLDOG]

Napolitano: Trump First President to Confront Deep State

Judge Andrew Napolitano praised Donald Trump as the first president to challenge the mysterious, controlling ‘deep state’ in the modern American era.
View attachment 115893



Shadow government desperate to destroy uncompromised 'People's President'
=========================================================

It's funny how many lefties won't listen to even a Judge as he tries tell ppl what is going on.

Trump is the first President to confront the deep state?

You do remember JFK, right?

_____________

You mean the JFK who said:

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."

He would get run out of today's Democratic Party. They would have him say:

"From each according to his ability to each according to his need".

______________

Acts 11:29 (KJV) Then the disciples, every man according to his ability, determined to send relief unto the brethren which dwelt in Judaea:

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump first President to confront deep state

Which state is the deepest? I live in NJ

It does not seem that deep

Ever been to Texas or Louisiana? Shit gets pretty deep there.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Trump is the first President to confront the deep state?
You do remember JFK, right?

I dont think he had a cognitive model of what is involved as the Deep State.

I think he saw it as merely a set of encrusted Bureaucrats that need to be scraped off the federal governments ass.

He went after the Federal Reserve with his EO regarding the issuance of silver backed money, and I think that is what got him killed. And the Establishment is very careful now to rewrite all public history of that event.

 

[MindWars]

The White House has been taken over by the tinfoil hat conspiracy theory guys.

The President gets his "news" from Breitbart, foreign policy from InfoWars, and doesn't read security briefings.

It's like bad reality TV. You can't believe it can get worse, and then, it does.

I haven't enjoyed watching a President lose his mind so much since Tricky Dicky.

Unlike Nixon, Trump will never resign.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

And it's all worked on ppl like you , in fact your types are so deeply indoctrinated you do not even know what you don't know.


OH AND LOOK WHOSE BEHIND BRAIN WASHING DUMB FKS INTO THINKING MOST TRUTH'S ARE A CONSPIRACY THE GAWD DAMN CIA BEHIND IT AGAIN..

In 1967, the CIA Created the Label "Conspiracy Theorists" ... to Attack Anyone Who Challenges the "Official" Narrative

Conspiracy Theorists USED TO Be Accepted As Normal
Democracy and free market capitalism were founded on conspiracy theories.

The Magna Carta, the Constitution and Declaration of Independence and other founding Western documents were based on conspiracy theories. Greek democracy and free market capitalism were also based on conspiracy theories.

But those were the bad old days …Things have now changed.

The CIA Coined the Term Conspiracy Theorist In 1967
That all changed in the 1960s.

Specifically, in April 1967, the CIA wrote a dispatch which coined the term “conspiracy theories” … and recommended methods for discrediting such theories. The dispatch was marked “psych” – short for “psychological operations” or disinformation – and “CS” for the CIA’s “Clandestine Services” unit.

The dispatch was produced in responses to a Freedom of Information Act request by the New York Times in 1976.

The dispatch states:



2. This trend of opinion is a matter of concern to the U.S. government, including our organization.



***



The aim of this dispatch is to provide material countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries. Background information is supplied in a classified section and in a number of unclassified attachments.



3. Action. We do not recommend that discussion of the [conspiracy] question be initiated where it is not already taking place. Where discussion is active addresses are requested:



a. To discuss the publicity problem with and friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors) , pointing out that the [official investigation of the relevant event] made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that the charges of the critics are without serious foundation, and that further speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by … propagandists. Urge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation.



b. To employ propaganda assets to and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passing to assets. Our ploy should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (I) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II) politically interested, (III) financially interested, (IV) hasty and inaccurate in their research, or (V) infatuated with their own theories.



***



4. In private to media discussions not directed at any particular writer, or in attacking publications which may be yet forthcoming, the following arguments should be useful:



a. No significant new evidence has emerged which the Commission did not consider.



***



b. Critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others. They tend to place more emphasis on the recollections of individual witnesses (which are less reliable and more divergent–and hence offer more hand-holds for criticism) …



***



c. Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal in the United States, esp. since informants could expect to receive large royalties, etc.



***



d. Critics have often been enticed by a form of intellectual pride: they light on some theory and fall in love with it; they also scoff at the Commission because it did not always answer every question with a flat decision one way or the other.



***



f. As to charges that the Commission’s report was a rush job, it emerged three months after the deadline originally set. But to the degree that the Commission tried to speed up its reporting, this was largely due to the pressure of irresponsible speculation already appearing, in some cases coming from the same critics who, refusing to admit their errors, are now putting out new criticisms.



g. Such vague accusations as that “more than ten people have died mysteriously” can always be explained in some natural way ….



5. Where possible, counter speculation by encouraging reference to the Commission’s Report itself. Open-minded foreign readers should still be impressed by the care, thoroughness, objectivity and speed with which the Commission worked. Reviewers of other books might be encouraged to add to their account the idea that, checking back with the report itself, they found it far superior to the work of its critics.

Here are screenshots of part of the memo:



Summarizing the tactics which the CIA dispatch recommended:

• Claim that it would be impossible for so many people would keep quiet about such a big conspiracy

• Have people friendly to the CIA attack the claims, and point back to “official” reports

• Claim that eyewitness testimony is unreliable

• Claim that this is all old news, as “no significant new evidence has emerged”

• Ignore conspiracy claims unless discussion about them is already too active

• Claim that it’s irresponsible to speculate

• Accuse theorists of being wedded to and infatuated with their theories

 

[MACAULAY]

Napolitano: Trump First President to Confront Deep State

Judge Andrew Napolitano praised Donald Trump as the first president to challenge the mysterious, controlling ‘deep state’ in the modern American era.
View attachment 115893



Shadow government desperate to destroy uncompromised 'People's President'
=========================================================

It's funny how many lefties won't listen to even a Judge as he tries tell ppl what is going on.

Trump is the first President to confront the deep state?

You do remember JFK, right?

_____________

You mean the JFK who said:

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."

He would get run out of today's Democratic Party. They would have him say:

"From each according to his ability to each according to his need".

______________

Acts 11:29 (KJV) Then the disciples, every man according to his ability, determined to send relief unto the brethren which dwelt in Judaea:

______________-

Well, it sounds like you are admitting that the Democratic Party has turned into a bunch of Marxists Bolsheviks (we can agree on that) and you are trying to use the Bible to justify it.

Lets see how that works out for you in winning back Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan where the over-taxed citizens are tired of supporting the Federal Plantation Porch Sitters and Public Employee Unions who you Bolsheviks have bought off by running up a 20 trillion dollar debt for our children and grandchildren.

Seems the Good Book says something about a man earning his own bread with the sweat of his own brow...you can get me the exact quote if you are so moved. Lets try that out in Detroit and Chicago and other rotting cities which have been run by Marxist Democrats for half a century.

____________

 

[BULLDOG]

Napolitano: Trump First President to Confront Deep State

Judge Andrew Napolitano praised Donald Trump as the first president to challenge the mysterious, controlling ‘deep state’ in the modern American era.
View attachment 115893



Shadow government desperate to destroy uncompromised 'People's President'
=========================================================

It's funny how many lefties won't listen to even a Judge as he tries tell ppl what is going on.

Trump is the first President to confront the deep state?

You do remember JFK, right?

_____________

You mean the JFK who said:

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."

He would get run out of today's Democratic Party. They would have him say:

"From each according to his ability to each according to his need".

______________

Acts 11:29 (KJV) Then the disciples, every man according to his ability, determined to send relief unto the brethren which dwelt in Judaea:

______________-

Well, it sound like you are admitting that the Democratic Party has turned into a bunch of Marxists Bolsheviks (we can agree on that) and you are trying to use the Bible to justify it.

Lets see how that works out for you in winning back Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan where the over-taxed citizens are tired of supporting the Federal Plantation Porch Sitters and Public employee Unions who you Bolsheviks have bought off by running up a 20 trillion dollar debt for our children and grandchildren.

Seems the Good Book says something about a man earning his own bread with the sweat of his own brow...you can get me the exact quote if you are so moved. Lets try that out in Detroit and Chicago and other rotting cities which have been run by Marxist Democrats for half a century.

____________

You portrayed a statement about helping others as an evil thing. I merely showed you a quote from centuries before Marx or the Bolsheviks that portrayed it in a much different light. Compassion and helping others is the basis of Christianity, which the right is so fond of espousing. Marx and the Bolsheviks weren't wrong in that particular stated goal. They were wrong when their own greed over rode the implementation of the lofty things they promised. Another thing you might want to consider is that the bible never said that if a man cannot work,he should not eat. There have always been lots of old and disabled people,and children, and people who just couldn't find work, even back in bible times, and you can't point out a single verse that says to let them starve. No, Jesus said "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself". Of course, you are free to pick and chose the parts you like and don't like, but then you can't espouse your Christian beliefs as grounds for your opinions.