My Verdict is in

[LoneLaugher]

Dumbfuck....has the national debt become worse or not under Obamination?

At the same time, has the economy recovered under Obamination?

So let's see dumbfuck, he has spent more than any other POTUS in history and the economy isn't getting better but of course you have no problem with him spending more fucking money and taxing people that employ people.

You are a stupid pile of shit that should not be allowed to living outside a rubber room.

You nutters should find out what direction he is taking before you decide to comment on it.

Pop the bubble, already! After your initial embarrassment, you'll feel great.

Whew! You really convinced me with that post. You are one eloquent cocksucker, ain't ya?

 

[Oddball]

Sure. It is about 4 trillion dollars in proposed budget cuts.....with specifics.....set forth by the Obama administration.

Great reading.

And....I am more a Rick than a Chumlee.

No, you're definitely a Chumlee...And just where do those alleged $4 bil in cuts come from and spread out over what time frame?

I see. You are going to be a straight-up dick in this thread too. So much for witty pawn shop humor.

Read the fucking thing. It is there for you. Take the time to learn about the topic that you claim is so important to you. Spending cuts.......outlined and everything.

Here is is again.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/ccs.pdf

No, I'm asking you for specifics and you're deflecting and yammering incoherently like the aforementioned pop culture tool.

I'm not going to pour through an acre of disingenuous fucking White House boilerplate.

Where are the cuts made, are they real cuts (as opposed to reductions to baseline increases), over what time frame are they proposed, and how much to what programs/agencies?

 

[Wry Catcher]

The far right today is bitter - they lost an election they believed they would win - and continue to attack President Obama with the same lame lies as they have since his nomination, rather than engage in a bit of introspection as a mature adult might do. 'Furthermore, they posit a socioeconomic theory as lame as those proposed by the Utopian socialists over a century ago. Different, but all bullshit is different and the same (I hope that's not too abstract for the odd dudes).

 

[Harry Dresden]

Wanna give us the Cliff Notes., Chumlee?

Sure. It is about 4 trillion dollars in proposed budget cuts.....with specifics.....set forth by the Obama administration.

Great reading.

And....I am more a Rick than a Chumlee.

Chumlee is the guy at the Vegas pawn shop....

 

[GoneBezerk]

You are a piece of shit that is inferior to me in intellect, thus you don't deserve any respect. You are also a scumbag with your beliefs which makes you even worse.

Dumbfuck....has the national debt become worse or not under Obamination?

At the same time, has the economy recovered under Obamination?

So let's see dumbfuck, he has spent more than any other POTUS in history and the economy isn't getting better but of course you have no problem with him spending more fucking money and taxing people that employ people.

You are a stupid pile of shit that should not be allowed to living outside a rubber room.

You nutters should find out what direction he is taking before you decide to comment on it.

Pop the bubble, already! After your initial embarrassment, you'll feel great.

Whew! You really convinced me with that post. You are one eloquent cocksucker, ain't ya?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Read it, Junior. It is all there and hardly boilerplate. Just read it.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Wanna give us the Cliff Notes., Chumlee?

Sure. It is about 4 trillion dollars in proposed budget cuts.....with specifics.....set forth by the Obama administration.

Great reading.

And....I am more a Rick than a Chumlee.

Chumlee is the guy at the Vegas pawn shop....

Yep.....and Rick is his boss. Good show.

 

[Oddball]

The far right today is bitter - they lost an election they believed they would win - and continue to attack President Obama with the same lame lies as they have since his nomination, rather than engage in a bit of introspection. 'Furthermore, they posit a socioeconomic theory as lame as those proposed by the Utopian socialists over a century ago. Different, but all bullshit is different and the same (I hope that's not too abstract for the odd dudes).

Hearing a completely detached hack like you claim that anyone else is due for a moment of introspection is a serious knee-slapper.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Dumbfuck....has the national debt become worse or not under Obamination?

At the same time, has the economy recovered under Obamination?

So let's see dumbfuck, he has spent more than any other POTUS in history and the economy isn't getting better but of course you have no problem with him spending more fucking money and taxing people that employ people.

You are a stupid pile of shit that should not be allowed to living outside a rubber room.

You nutters should find out what direction he is taking before you decide to comment on it.

Pop the bubble, already! After your initial embarrassment, you'll feel great.

Whew! You really convinced me with that post. You are one eloquent cocksucker, ain't ya?

i think he has gone Berserk......

 

[Oddball]

Read it, Junior. It is all there and hardly boilerplate. Just read it.

Provide details or fuck off.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Read it, Junior. It is all there and hardly boilerplate. Just read it.

Provide details or fuck off.

Only a special person would prefer my cliffs notes....which would be far less detailed....over the full proposal AND AT THE SAME TIME CRY FOR DETAILS!!!!

You are special.

 

[Wry Catcher]

No, you're definitely a Chumlee...And just where do those alleged $4 bil in cuts come from and spread out over what time frame?

I see. You are going to be a straight-up dick in this thread too. So much for witty pawn shop humor.

Read the fucking thing. It is there for you. Take the time to learn about the topic that you claim is so important to you. Spending cuts.......outlined and everything.

Here is is again.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/ccs.pdf

No, I'm asking you for specifics and you're deflecting and yammering incoherently like the aforementioned pop culture tool.

I'm not going to pour through an acre of disingenuous fucking White House boilerplate.

Willful Ignorance Alert!

Where are the cuts made, are they real cuts (as opposed to reductions to baseline increases), over what time frame are they proposed, and how much to what programs/agencies?

We can be sure there will be no cuts to the salary and benefits to members of Congress. Has anyone noticed those entitlements have not been mentioned by Boehner, McConnell or Ron and Rand Paul. Fucking hypocrites.

 

[GuyPinestra]

This is serious. isn't it?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/ccs.pdf

$1 trillion over 10 years...

$800 billion over 10 years from the "tax hike on the rich"...

$1.8 trillion over 10 years to reduce a budget deficit that is ALMOST that big EVERY YEAR?

And you call that 'serious'?

 

[Duped]

This is serious. isn't it?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/ccs.pdf

$1 trillion over 10 years...

$800 billion over 10 years from the "tax hike on the rich"...

$1.8 trillion over 10 years to reduce a budget deficit that is ALMOST that big EVERY YEAR?

And you call that 'serious'?

Don't forget the debt ceiling, and more spending - What is it 400B!

 

[GoneBezerk]

Strange....I didn't see Obamacare in that liberal hack document.

Hmmmm, $2T added to the debt and not slimmed down.....that's like a family is in debt and the man of the house (which you don't understand) goes out and gets a 2nd house at a high interest rate just for the hell of it.

This is serious. isn't it?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/ccs.pdf

 

[LoneLaugher]

Well Ladies and Gents......we have graduated from "no cuts" to "not serious cuts" in this thread. Progress!

 

[GuyPinestra]

I see. You are going to be a straight-up dick in this thread too. So much for witty pawn shop humor.

Read the fucking thing. It is there for you. Take the time to learn about the topic that you claim is so important to you. Spending cuts.......outlined and everything.

Here is is again.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/ccs.pdf

No, I'm asking you for specifics and you're deflecting and yammering incoherently like the aforementioned pop culture tool.

I'm not going to pour through an acre of disingenuous fucking White House boilerplate.

Willful Ignorance Alert!

Where are the cuts made, are they real cuts (as opposed to reductions to baseline increases), over what time frame are they proposed, and how much to what programs/agencies?

We can be sure there will be no cuts to the salary and benefits to members of Congress. Has anyone noticed those entitlements have not been mentioned by Boehner, McConnell or Ron and Rand Paul. Fucking hypocrites.

Why don't you find out which Congresscritters RETURN money to the Treasury before making bullshit accusations?

I think Congress should get a wage equal to the median US income. I think they should give up their retirement and health benefits and have them replaced with Soc Sec and Medicare.

And I think you're an ignorant hack to try and lay shit on Ron & Rand Paul when THEY'RE the guys giving money BACK!

Fucking asshole!

 

[Paulie]

No, I'm asking you for specifics and you're deflecting and yammering incoherently like the aforementioned pop culture tool.

I'm not going to pour through an acre of disingenuous fucking White House boilerplate.

Willful Ignorance Alert!

Where are the cuts made, are they real cuts (as opposed to reductions to baseline increases), over what time frame are they proposed, and how much to what programs/agencies?

We can be sure there will be no cuts to the salary and benefits to members of Congress. Has anyone noticed those entitlements have not been mentioned by Boehner, McConnell or Ron and Rand Paul. Fucking hypocrites.

Why don't you find out which Congresscritters RETURN money to the Treasury before making bullshit accusations?

I think Congress should get a wage equal to the median US income. I think they should give up their retirement and health benefits and have them replaced with Soc Sec and Medicare.

And I think you're an ignorant hack to try and lay shit on Ron & Rand Paul when THEY'RE the guys giving money BACK!

Fucking asshole!

Hey, I'll take it. It's better than "irrelevant".

 

[konradv]

So after the election, I said in here, and I meant it. That I was hopeful that now that he was back in Office Obama would start worrying about legacy and less about his base and he might actually get serious about Balancing the Budget and Reforming Entitlements.

His plan, he out lined today blows that Hope right out of the water. It confirms to me that he is still as far left as ever, and has no intentions for working with the other side.

It's really a laughable plan, with no spending cuts at all, and another 50 Billion stimulus. then there is how he wants congress to give him the power to raise the Debt limit all on his own.

Clearly that is not a serious proposal, and he knows full well the GOP could never agree to it.

So, as I feared Obama actually wants us to go over the Cliff. He wants everyone's taxes to go up, and Defense spending to be gutted. He knows he can get both with out any of the blame simply by not compromising with the GOP now.

But, I don't really blame him. The GOP did this to themselves when they set up this fucking Cliff BS. They should have been able to predict that Obama would actually want it to happen.

That way he can blame taxes going up on all people on the GOP, and start calling for "new" tax cuts for the Middle and lower brackets after the first of the year.

It's going to be a very long 4 years, It is crystal clear to me now which direction Obama intends to go, the one I always thought he would go, despite holding out hope I was wrong.

Enjoy it America, You voted for it.

What I find laughable is the lock-step acceptance that the first proposal of a negotiation is a line in the sand. Recent history tells us that it's the Republicans that have drawing lines, not the Democrats. I'm afraid your analysis is a FAIL, IMO, since the story isn't over by a long shot.

 

[konradv]

Of course it's not a serious proposal...That's the point.

Then he can go out and call the republicans intransigent (even though only his toady underlings have ever met face-to-face with them) and his media buttbois will help him blame everything on the republicans.

It's 1995 all over again, dude.

Yeah sure, like you know what's serious or not. If the Republicans are being called intransigent, it's because of reactions like this. Get real. This is the first step in a negotiation and you're painting it as the final word. Jump the gun much?