- Banned
- #21
If there were what you consider "valid evidence" and a "reasonable time frame" you'd find other qualifiers to defend why you're supporting this rapist.You all keep saying that rape is okay because of Bill Clinton. Very strange.Kavenaugh has a black cloud over himThen why didn’t this happen to Gorsuch? Trump should nominate this woman you’re talking about. Withdraw this sick rapist.All they need is a sliver of doubt of heart-string pulling ahead of common sense, facts and Due Process and they can justify voting no. Or, they can pull the old "we need a full FBI investigation"
Trump will then choose the female judge he had in the finals, and the same fence sitters will suggest she is "too ideologically Catholic" and your nation will be choosing from a list Liberal judges in 2019. Maybe two liberal judges as others retire. You know the Democrats will NEVER vote anything the GOP puts forward, rarely if ever.
This is the Acid Test. If you cannot protect your Republic, and your name is the Republican Party, than Trump might as well just run as an Independent and save it himself as your value is greatly diminished.
She may have been attacked, even probably was attacked, but the timing and the circumstances behind it suggest there's no way to prove it was who she said it was, and the allegation is being used for political purposes.
Best to withdraw and come out with a less controversial candidate
Nope, if you Hillarybots can stand by BillyJeff, then the Republicans should stand by Kavanaugh, especially when 2 men admitted it was them and not Kavanaugh and Judge.
It's definitely not ok, but let's be clear, she doesn't claim she was raped.
Also, it's not ok for some to exploit a womans experience for their own political gain and condemning a man outside of a court of law with no evidence other than the word of someone else from 36 years prior.
If this came out 30 years ago, or 25 years ago, it would still be suspect but there wouldn't be this cloud of the S.C nomination. Consider the other allegation, some of which are outlandish and from a person who was represented by Katz 10 years ago and is now represented by the CPL.
I feel sorry for her, she's being used as a pawn. I don't feel sorry for standing up for ANY person accused without valid evidence and a reasonable time frame.