Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Look at the jerkoff boy run his mouth like the smoke house it is...He never does, he's a troll, with no life, except to post on here.Just like the looney right don't want to believe that the feds are not going to invade Texass..Even the lefties ain't showing up for this. They're waiting for a better issue to cherry pick.
Don't really know what you're talking about. You're certainly not directly responding to anything that I posted.
I don't but please show us the ignorance that is you..Liberals seem to be absolutely fine with freedom of speech just as long as they agree with it.
Draw or sculpt something about Jesus getting pissed on and Libs love it.
Freedom of expression....Libs shitting all over the American flag....Libs love that even more.
Draw something showing Muhammad and man oh man do the Libs come out in force and
get in your face about it.
Bringing lethally-violent opponents of Free Speech out into the open in order to identify and kill them is a signal accomplishment in its own right....It's intended to agitate the enemies of free speech, and it doesn't accomplish anything more than that.
Please, let me invite you to a cartoon festival in Texas...we will be displaying drawings of the Anti-Christ Muhammad. He will be displayed in the basest light possible. It will be a hoot and holler for everyone.Was National Socialism a race? If not then neither is Islam, in fact Islam is the largest most violent hate group on the planet.
We'd have to compare the numbers of dead and injured.
I wonder how many people Muslims have killed since 1945, and how many the US of Arse has killed.
Of course, America had a good start because there was only a tiny problem in the middle east untill America supported Israel and destabilised the region.
Try finding Terrorist attacks against America before 1970. The vast majority were from otger countries you attacked and murdered people in.
From Mr. Cagle's op ed accompanying the toon (bold by me):This is work by Daryl Cagle.Yes... that has the ring of truth to it... Leftist cheese-eating Surrender-Monkey mentality... lest we anger the Bad Guys.This is what the left thinks of anyone who dares to draw (or show) the pedophile, Muhammad.
He had two friends killed in the Charlie Hebdo attacks, and his op eds have been overwhelmingly in favour of freedom of speech. He's thoroughly pro-cartoonist. At least he was in the last few articles of his I've read.
This toon isn't particularly clear, but I think what he's trying to say is that cartoonists have never shied away from drawing all manner of offensive characters (Nazis, the KKK, etc.). I really don't think his intention is to compare the "Draw Mohammed" cartoonists with Nazis, etc.
I thank you for the info. While I could see argument being valid; I just am quite skeptical that it is the case. If you find comments from the cartoonist that support your analysis, go ahead and post.....
I’m an editorial cartoonist; I haven’t drawn a Muhammad cartoon myself, because I haven’t been inspired to do so. I shy away from drawing cartoons that some people would find offensive. I don’t use four letter words, or the “N-word” in my cartoons. I don’t draw sexually explicit cartoons. Offensive subject matter in cartoons can be so loud that it drowns out anything else I might want to say in a cartoon, except, “Look, I have the freedom to draw something offensive.”
Many cartoonists have drawn Muhammad cartoons, and racist cartoons, and dirty cartoons; that’s fine, that’s their business – but drawing offensive stuff just to draw attention to myself, or to prove that I have the right to do so, just looks like lousy cartooning to me. The Charlie Hebdo cartoonists were doing more than that; they were addressing issues in French culture that were important to them, and rejecting all religions that they felt didn’t fit with their secular society.
I knew three of the five Charlie Hebdo cartoonists who were murdered earlier this year and I got to know more of them at French cartoon festivals. They have a genuine passion for their issues and our conversations always turned to a discussion of their religion-bashing cartoons. Here in America we’re not faced with the same social pressures and similar cartoons here should seem out of place.
I can sympathize with his position. He's basically saying that editorial cartoons are intended to serve as meaningful social commentary, and that the DMC doesn't aspire to such. It's intended to agitate the enemies of free speech, and it doesn't accomplish anything more than that.
Liberals seem to be absolutely fine with freedom of speech just as long as they agree with it.
Draw or sculpt something about Jesus getting pissed on and Libs love it.
Freedom of expression....Libs shitting all over the American flag....Libs love that even more.
Draw something showing Muhammad and man oh man do the Libs come out in force and
get in your face about it.
Hey shit for brains, the subject was corporate influence of governmental policy. Do you always leap before you look?Says a moonglow, who's only real job is wasting time on USMB...Sorry old bean, but you'll never convince a multi-billion dollar corp to see it your whey...I don't think you have any idea. I asked you to state what liability they face, and you haven't done so.
For the uninitiated I guess I shall, The liability issue can come from bombing, raids, assassinations or hacking..Most corporations don't want or need that type of liability by endorsing issues that will fan the flames of possible liabilities to their investors...
Suddenly, telling the news is "endorsing."
And you're endorsing living in fear. And your liability talk is a smoke screen to not dare bash your coveted Islam.
Seems that multi-billion dollar corporations endorse all kinds of Nascar teams, if a corp. can make money by marketing to a specific group, then you can bet, it will happen. It's called capitalism. Not that moonglow understands that concept.
You getting mad at someone 'changing the subject.' That's rich!
At least 2 millions worth..Hey shit for brains, the subject was corporate influence of governmental policy. Do you always leap before you look?Says a moonglow, who's only real job is wasting time on USMB...Sorry old bean, but you'll never convince a multi-billion dollar corp to see it your whey...For the uninitiated I guess I shall, The liability issue can come from bombing, raids, assassinations or hacking..Most corporations don't want or need that type of liability by endorsing issues that will fan the flames of possible liabilities to their investors...
Suddenly, telling the news is "endorsing."
And you're endorsing living in fear. And your liability talk is a smoke screen to not dare bash your coveted Islam.
Seems that multi-billion dollar corporations endorse all kinds of Nascar teams, if a corp. can make money by marketing to a specific group, then you can bet, it will happen. It's called capitalism. Not that moonglow understands that concept.
Let me see.
An idiot racist bitch sets up a competition to create hate.
Was National Socialism a race? If not then neither is Islam, in fact Islam is the largest most violent hate group on the planet.
Quran (8:55) - Surely the vilest of animals in Allah's sight are those who disbelieve
Quran (48:29) - Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves
Quran (9:30) - And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah... Allah (Himself) fights against them. How perverse are they!
Quran (8:12) - I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them
Quran (9:123) - O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness
Quran (5:33) - The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement
From Mr. Cagle's op ed accompanying the toon (bold by me):This is work by Daryl Cagle.Yes... that has the ring of truth to it... Leftist cheese-eating Surrender-Monkey mentality... lest we anger the Bad Guys.This is what the left thinks of anyone who dares to draw (or show) the pedophile, Muhammad.
He had two friends killed in the Charlie Hebdo attacks, and his op eds have been overwhelmingly in favour of freedom of speech. He's thoroughly pro-cartoonist. At least he was in the last few articles of his I've read.
This toon isn't particularly clear, but I think what he's trying to say is that cartoonists have never shied away from drawing all manner of offensive characters (Nazis, the KKK, etc.). I really don't think his intention is to compare the "Draw Mohammed" cartoonists with Nazis, etc.
I thank you for the info. While I could see argument being valid; I just am quite skeptical that it is the case. If you find comments from the cartoonist that support your analysis, go ahead and post.....
I’m an editorial cartoonist; I haven’t drawn a Muhammad cartoon myself, because I haven’t been inspired to do so. I shy away from drawing cartoons that some people would find offensive. I don’t use four letter words, or the “N-word” in my cartoons. I don’t draw sexually explicit cartoons. Offensive subject matter in cartoons can be so loud that it drowns out anything else I might want to say in a cartoon, except, “Look, I have the freedom to draw something offensive.”
Many cartoonists have drawn Muhammad cartoons, and racist cartoons, and dirty cartoons; that’s fine, that’s their business – but drawing offensive stuff just to draw attention to myself, or to prove that I have the right to do so, just looks like lousy cartooning to me. The Charlie Hebdo cartoonists were doing more than that; they were addressing issues in French culture that were important to them, and rejecting all religions that they felt didn’t fit with their secular society.
I knew three of the five Charlie Hebdo cartoonists who were murdered earlier this year and I got to know more of them at French cartoon festivals. They have a genuine passion for their issues and our conversations always turned to a discussion of their religion-bashing cartoons. Here in America we’re not faced with the same social pressures and similar cartoons here should seem out of place.
I can sympathize with his position. He's basically saying that editorial cartoons are intended to serve as meaningful social commentary, and that the DMC doesn't aspire to such. It's intended to agitate the enemies of free speech, and it doesn't accomplish anything more than that.
Let me see.
An idiot racist bitch sets up a competition to create hate.
Was National Socialism a race? If not then neither is Islam, in fact Islam is the largest most violent hate group on the planet.
Quran (8:55) - Surely the vilest of animals in Allah's sight are those who disbelieve
Quran (48:29) - Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves
Quran (9:30) - And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah... Allah (Himself) fights against them. How perverse are they!
Quran (8:12) - I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them
Quran (9:123) - O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness
Quran (5:33) - The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement
Who is at the heart of geo-political terrorism? It sure as heck ain't Jewish terrorists. Don't be trying to shamelessly lump the two together. That's what you should be apologizing for.
If you have to use violence to defend your religion, is it really a religion? Christianity figured that out, as did the Hindu.
If you have to use violence to defend your religion, is it really a religion? Christianity figured that out, as did the Hindu.
Now, if they could just stop enabling pedophiles, you might actually be on your way!
I know from past posts of yours you are not very bright and simple in thought. That's not your fault. But maybe a few examples will help
Threads like this and activities such as occurred in Texas are seen all over the world; only a fool or a warmonger believes this does not aid the radical Muslim minority in recruitment, especially those easily biddable and willing to die to kill innocent Americans (see the last bullet point above).
- You never stare at a bear and hold eye contact - even if you think s/he is far away
- You never poke someone in the chest, unless you want a violent response
- You never tug on superman's cape (there is no one more dangerous than a suicidal man).
I hope that opens your mind, if your ignorance is willful.
I hear that a lot, but it always ignores the minor details:
You could legally have sex with an 11 year old girl in much of America until a little over 100 years ago
The massive number of Americans who go to Asia for sex with children.
In fact, most Muslim countries have a higher age of consent than most Christian countries, and the few that don't have smaller populations than the number of American sex tourists.
Dipshits that need a religion to tell them what to do are losers....You have no idea what liability issues this could bring a corporation?Why take the liability???
What liability?
I don't think you have any idea. I asked you to state what liability they face, and you haven't done so.
For the uninitiated I guess I shall, The liability issue can come from bombing, raids, assassinations or hacking..Most corporations don't want or need that type of liability by endorsing issues that will fan the flames of possible liabilities to their investors...
Suddenly, telling the news is "endorsing."
And you're endorsing living in fear. And your liability talk is a smoke screen to not dare bash your coveted Islam.
Look at the jerkoff boy run his mouth like the smoke house it is...He never does, he's a troll, with no life, except to post on here.Just like the looney right don't want to believe that the feds are not going to invade Texass..Even the lefties ain't showing up for this. They're waiting for a better issue to cherry pick.
Don't really know what you're talking about. You're certainly not directly responding to anything that I posted.
can't take a dose of your own medicine, huh? 
Says an idiot, who spends his entire life online, and has never been outside. Yeah, your opinion matters...Dipshits that need a religion to tell them what to do are losers....You have no idea what liability issues this could bring a corporation?What liability?
I don't think you have any idea. I asked you to state what liability they face, and you haven't done so.
For the uninitiated I guess I shall, The liability issue can come from bombing, raids, assassinations or hacking..Most corporations don't want or need that type of liability by endorsing issues that will fan the flames of possible liabilities to their investors...
Suddenly, telling the news is "endorsing."
And you're endorsing living in fear. And your liability talk is a smoke screen to not dare bash your coveted Islam.
I spent more time outside playing sports and working than you have in the years you have been on the planet...Says an idiot, who spends his entire life online, and has never been outside. Yeah, your opinion matters...Dipshits that need a religion to tell them what to do are losers....You have no idea what liability issues this could bring a corporation?
I don't think you have any idea. I asked you to state what liability they face, and you haven't done so.
For the uninitiated I guess I shall, The liability issue can come from bombing, raids, assassinations or hacking..Most corporations don't want or need that type of liability by endorsing issues that will fan the flames of possible liabilities to their investors...
Suddenly, telling the news is "endorsing."
And you're endorsing living in fear. And your liability talk is a smoke screen to not dare bash your coveted Islam.
