We get the fact that this patently clear and rationally undeniable fact sails way the fuck over your pinhead. But, yeah. It is ok.
It is what it is. And what it is is a simple, straightforward, correct statement of fact.
Thank me very much.
You'd trust an article from here:
Ikhwanweb :: The Muslim Brotherhood Official English Website
as much as you'd trust one from here?:
The Associated Press | The essential global news network
Utterly beside the point. I'm not talking about pre-judgmentalism.
I'm talking, instead, about the MERITS of any particular piece in question.
If you say stupid, ignorant, erroneous shit which (because it's false and unverifiable) cannot be supported, then it does not matter one tiny bit WHERE it is published or posted.
For example, some liberoidals will believe almost ANYTHING wiritten, AT ALL, provided that it's written in The New York Slimes. But if it's an article by that scum-sucking liar who eventually got fired for his publication of creative fiction (i.e., deliberate lies) then such fawning devotion to The Slimes is quite clearly a silly thing. The fact that his shit was printed in the alleged Paper of Record didn't make his lies suddenly truthful.
Contrariwise: if a guy bothers to properly verify his facts and sources them and double checks them and only then prints his piece for the World to read, it does not become a pile of shit just because it happens to be printed in some fucking bullshit rag like The New York Slimes.