Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
no, loser. he wasn't.
What is with the Name Calling?... You and Ravi are both Liberal Women...
It's Assumed that you are to be Treated Differently on these Forums because you are Girls, and that's been Established, yet neither of you Act in a Way that Demands the Respect that a Lady Deserves.
Grow the Fuck up.
peace...
what's the matter, racist creep? don't like being shown for what you are?
what on earth are you talking about "demands the respect that a lady deserves?" i expect nothing from a loser like you. seems i am not alone in that regard.
and, in fact, you live up to those low expectations constantly.
unhappy racist losers like you spend your lives feeling like everyone else in the world is getting over, so you're all about hating groups of people without discerning what individuals are valuable and which aren't.
listen, dude. If YOU can't figure out the difference between a NEWSPAPER and a BLOG then it's no wonder why your kind also had a little issue with gravity and geocentrism. What YOU think is a concrete claim means two things: Jack and Shit.
Hell, you can use, poorly, however many adjectives you think will layer on top of the giant pile of stupid you bring to this thread. At the end of the day you are still the laugh inducing idiot who thinks that a BLOG is just as valid of a source as a NEWSPAPER.
oh man.. you silly bastards are the gift that keeps on giving..
How'd Newsweak's Claim that our GI's were Flushing Qurans work out?...
Oh yeah, they got BLOOD all over their Hands for Lying.
The New York Times "Respectable"?...
Jayson Blair Ring a Bell?...
Deal with the Substance Presented...
If it's False, Illustrate it.
Dismissing it is simply Dishonest.
peace...
Which illustrates my point precisely, dummy. An falsely reported NEWSPAPER article has legal liability and tries to avoid libel on penalty of a civil suit; A BLOG has no such restrictions and is about as much a viable source as that dick in your mouth is a lollipop.
Here is the REST OF US laughing our asses off at you.
THANKS FOR THE LAUGH, FUCKTARD!
Ascribing theological motives to black violence is like saying that dogs sniff each other's asses as part of their PhD dissertations. Blacks do idiotic shit because they're a race of children, period. No need to delve into complexities or mysteries. They like the idea of "Islam" because 1) it's a violent religion that 2) isn't white or Christian and 3) isn't Jewish. That's the attraction, folks. Farrakhan and his bowties are just a heady way of hating whitey.
Clearly, the perpetrators were motivated out of a desire to wage "jihad" in the cause of Allah:
While imprisoned, John Lee Malvo wrote a number of erratic diatribes about what he termed "jihad" against the United States. "I have been accused on my mission. Allah knows I'm gonna suffer now", he wrote.Because his rants and drawings featured not only such figures as Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, but also characters from the film series The Matrix, these musings were dismissed as immaterial. - Beltway sniper attacks - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He was following the example of Morpheus, God's other last prophet.
Morons.
How'd Newsweak's Claim that our GI's were Flushing Qurans work out?...
Oh yeah, they got BLOOD all over their Hands for Lying.
The New York Times "Respectable"?...
Jayson Blair Ring a Bell?...
Deal with the Substance Presented...
If it's False, Illustrate it.
Dismissing it is simply Dishonest.
peace...
Which illustrates my point precisely, dummy. An falsely reported NEWSPAPER article has legal liability and tries to avoid libel on penalty of a civil suit; A BLOG has no such restrictions and is about as much a viable source as that dick in your mouth is a lollipop.
Here is the REST OF US laughing our asses off at you.
THANKS FOR THE LAUGH, FUCKTARD!
I have to bow to you for your skill in twisting that shit around. Well done!
* * * *
listen, dude. If YOU can't figure out the difference between a NEWSPAPER and a BLOG * * * *
* * * *
listen, dude. If YOU can't figure out the difference between a NEWSPAPER and a BLOG * * * *
Another sterling example of you being a deceptive sumbag mofo.
Everyone -- even lameass cocksuckers like you -- knows that there's a difference between a blog and a newspaper, you lying sack of rat pus.
But that's not the question and never was.
Your transparent effort to deflect notwithstanding, the truth remains. If Joe Average posts something intelligent, factually accurate and verifiable, it doesn't matter that he posted it in a blog. The merits of the piece itself stand on its own merits.
Byu contrast, assmunch, if someone posts some unverifiable, dishonest, unsourced, illogical tripe (like the shit you always post, for example), it is not improved just because it is printed in a newspaper. The underlying lack of merit doesn't change just because of where it is printed, you blithering simpleton.
* * * *
listen, dude. If YOU can't figure out the difference between a NEWSPAPER and a BLOG * * * *
Another sterling example of you being a deceptive sumbag mofo.
Everyone -- even lameass cocksuckers like you -- knows that there's a difference between a blog and a newspaper, you lying sack of rat pus.
But that's not the question and never was.
Your transparent effort to deflect notwithstanding, the truth remains. If Joe Average posts something intelligent, factually accurate and verifiable, it doesn't matter that he posted it in a blog. The merits of the piece itself stand on its own merits.
By contrast, assmunch, if someone posts some unverifiable, dishonest, unsourced, illogical tripe (like the shit you always post, for example), it is not improved just because it is printed in a newspaper. The underlying lack of merit doesn't change just because of where it is printed, you blithering simpleton.
nope. sorry. it really DOES matter.* * * *
Another sterling example of you being a deceptive sumbag mofo.
Everyone -- even lameass cocksuckers like you -- knows that there's a difference between a blog and a newspaper, you lying sack of rat pus.
But that's not the question and never was.
Your transparent effort to deflect notwithstanding, the truth remains. If Joe Average posts something intelligent, factually accurate and verifiable, it doesn't matter that he posted it in a blog. The merits of the piece itself stand on its own merits.
By contrast, assmunch, if someone posts some unverifiable, dishonest, unsourced, illogical tripe (like the shit you always post, for example), it is not improved just because it is printed in a newspaper. The underlying lack of merit doesn't change just because of where it is printed, you blithering simpleton.
nope. sorry. it really DOES matter.* * * *
Nope. You are either abysmally stupid or an outright unmitigated liar. Either way, you cannot refute what I said, as we can all plainly see. You lose again. It's what you losers do.
* * * *
I highlight all the fail in your opinion, dude. * * * *
Actually, you posted all of the pictures that Michelle Malkin deemed newsworthy.Oh please, I posted all the pictures Malvo created!
Where is this said? The motivation was nonsensical and involved extorting money from the government. Please explain how and why you believe that the killings were motivated by Islam. Doodles are not sufficient evidence.They were immaterial on gaining a murder conviction, but not to the motivation behind the killings.
You contradict yourself. Racism is fundamentally un-Islamic; therefore, there's no such thing as a racially-motivated "jihad" in Islam. Neither you nor the perpetrators know enough about Islam to determine whether something is a "jihad."Where they Al Qaeda operative? NO. Where they Islamofacist lone wolves? Without a doubt! Jihad and hatred of whitey definitely played a strong role in their murder spree!
Sorry, but drawing Osama bin Laden and writing "jihad" does not establish the perpetrators as Muslims. Notice the utter lack of Qur'anic passages, Arabic text, or anything that would indicate any knowledge of Islam whatsoever on their part. You're being irrational and Islamophobic.Kalam, I test you just once to look at the drawings and say they were the Matrix and not Jihad talk! If you can say that, then your !
Actually, you posted all of the pictures that Michelle Malkin deemed newsworthy.Oh please, I posted all the pictures Malvo created!
Where is this said? The motivation was nonsensical and involved extorting money from the government. Please explain how and why you believe that the killings were motivated by Islam. Doodles are not sufficient evidence.They were immaterial on gaining a murder conviction, but not to the motivation behind the killings.
You contradict yourself. Racism is fundamentally un-Islamic; therefore, there's no such thing as a racially-motivated "jihad" in Islam. Neither you nor the perpetrators know enough about Islam to determine whether something is a "jihad."Where they Al Qaeda operative? NO. Where they Islamofacist lone wolves? Without a doubt! Jihad and hatred of whitey definitely played a strong role in their murder spree!
Sorry, but drawing Osama bin Laden and writing "jihad" does not establish the perpetrators as Muslims. Notice the utter lack of Qur'anic passages, Arabic text, or anything that would indicate any knowledge of Islam whatsoever on their part. You're being irrational and Islamophobic.Kalam, I test you just once to look at the drawings and say they were the Matrix and not Jihad talk! If you can say that, then your !
Protect and apologize for Islamofacist to the bitter end, huh!
Protect and apologize for Islamofacist to the bitter end, huh!
In light of your failure to address any of my points, I will assume that you're conceding. I accept your concession.
Protect and apologize for Islamofacist to the bitter end, huh!
In light of your failure to address any of my points, I will assume that you're conceding. I accept your concession.
* * * *
I highlight all the fail in your opinion, dude. * * * *
Except, of course, that's just another one of your lies, turdbreath.
You cannot highlight a "fail" in my post when there was no fail in my post to begin with, ya dildo asslicker.
The FACT remains (which you will never be able to refute) that the accuracy and verifiability of a written work is completely unrelated to where it is printed or posted, you stupid fucking douchebag. Even retards in gradeschool can figure that much out. Small wonder that you can't.
* * * *
I highlight all the fail in your opinion, dude. * * * *
Except, of course, that's just another one of your lies, turdbreath.
You cannot highlight a "fail" in my post when there was no fail in my post to begin with, ya dildo asslicker.
The FACT remains (which you will never be able to refute) that the accuracy and verifiability of a written work is completely unrelated to where it is printed or posted, you stupid fucking douchebag. Even retards in gradeschool can figure that much out. Small wonder that you can't.
* * * *
yea. ok.
* * * *
We get the fact that this patently clear and rationally undeniable fact sails way the fuck over your pinhead. But, yeah. It is ok.
It is what it is. And what it is is a simple, straightforward, correct statement of fact.
Thank me very much.