Mueller Spokesman Issues Clarification: OLC Opinion Had NO Impact On Mueller Decision

[easyt65]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

 

[DJT for Life]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

Barr probably played him a tape of their phone conversation

 

[BlindBoo]

Hahahaha it's true. He never said "but for the OLC opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice." in either the report he submitted or in his statement yesterday. Those who have read what was released can draw their own conclusion on whether or not a crime was committed.

 

[caddo kid]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

Barr is placing more 'spin' on the SC Mueller report which implies that the DOJ in it's current form & representation is nothing more than a mouth piece for Trump & for Trump's influence.

This is however no surprise; not to those of US that are actually paying attention, like myself.

Trump is getting very nervous & Barr is making attempts to sooth Trump's sore, fucking, butt hurt ass.

 

[Lesh]

Joint DOJ?

That's BARR speaking...and we know he's a blatant liar

 

[Billy_Bob]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

That flatly contradicts Mueller's words. So Who is lying? Must have been
Mueller as Barr's statement is unchanged. I think Mueller just found himself in peril of legal recourse as he has already destroyed his legacy. Mueller will be known as a partisan hack.

 

[BlindBoo]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

That flatly contradicts Mueller's words. So Who is lying? Must have been
Mueller as Barrs statement is unchanged. I think Mueller just found himself in peril of legal recourse and he has already destroyed his legacy.

The joint statement in fact concluded there was no conflict between the two statements. Just some butthurt cream for Donnie so Sean can sooth him later tonight.

 

[BlindBoo]

Joint DOJ?

That's BARR speaking...and we know he's a blatant liar

No Barr didn't lie. Mueller didn't say "But for the OLC opinion, I would have found the President obstructed justice."

We know precisely what he said. He wrote it down for everyone to read.

The rubes needed some red meat and Donnie needs a little butthurt cream.

 

[easyt65]

Joint DOJ?

That's BARR speaking...and we know he's a blatant liar

Of course we do, which is why he agrees to testify under oath before Congress while Mueller sticks to ' drive-by' where he is safe from being caught in perjury / where he doesn't have to answer questions or defend his 'investigation'.

 

[easyt65]

Joint DOJ?

That's BARR speaking...and we know he's a blatant liar

No Barr didn't lie. Mueller didn't say "But for the OLC opinion, I would have found the President obstructed justice."

We know precisely what he said. He wrote it down for everyone to read.

The rubes needed some red meat and Donnie needs a little butthurt cream.

Mueller stated that if he believed the President had not committed a crime he would have said so....which infers if he had thought the President had committed a crime he WOULD have said so, which he never clearly stated..

He also went to great lengths to insinuate it was because of the OCL that he did not declare Trump has committed a crime and why he did not indict him.

Mueller's spokesman, not the DOJ released the 'clarification' that Mueller did not mean that the OCL decision had anything to do with Mueller's final decision.

Instead of doing what you snowflakes usually do, which is defend the conspirators and claim Trump is lying and Barr is covering up for him, why don't you have Nadler settle this once and for all by subpoenaing Mueller and force him to testify? That way he can clear the air, say what he really meant, and answer some questions about his investigation!

Oh wait...that's right - Mueller begged Nadler not to call him to testify before Congress during his Press Conference...

The last place wants to find himself is under oath before Congress....

 

[Darkwind]

What we need to be doing, now that Trump's innocence has been confirmed, is put pressure on him to balance the effin budget!!!

 

[Crepitus]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

That flatly contradicts Mueller's words. So Who is lying? Must have been
Mueller as Barr's statement is unchanged. I think Mueller just found himself in peril of legal recourse as he has already destroyed his legacy. Mueller will be known as a partisan hack.

Lol, this "joint statement" actually says there is not difference between the two statements.

 

[Crepitus]

What we need to be doing, now that Trump's innocence has been confirmed, is put pressure on him to balance the effin budget!!!

Innocence confirmed?

Where?

Just today he said Russia helped get him elected.

 

[Darkwind]

What we need to be doing, now that Trump's innocence has been confirmed, is put pressure on him to balance the effin budget!!!

Innocence confirmed?

Where?

Just today he said Russia helped get him elected.

Got indictments?

No?

Innocence confirmed.

He did not say Russia helped him get elected. You guys did. Deal with it.

 

[easyt65]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

That flatly contradicts Mueller's words. So Who is lying? Must have been
Mueller as Barr's statement is unchanged. I think Mueller just found himself in peril of legal recourse as he has already destroyed his legacy. Mueller will be known as a partisan hack.

Lol, this "joint statement" actually says there is not difference between the two statements.

Nice claim / opinion...

 

[Crepitus]

What we need to be doing, now that Trump's innocence has been confirmed, is put pressure on him to balance the effin budget!!!

Innocence confirmed?

Where?

Just today he said Russia helped get him elected.

Got indictments?

No?

Innocence confirmed.

He did not say Russia helped him get elected. You guys did. Deal with it.

• 
  Donald J. Trump
  @realDonaldTrump

Russia, Russia, Russia! That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax...And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected. It was a crime that didn’t exist. So now the Dems and their partner, the Fake News Media,.

 

[Crepitus]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

That flatly contradicts Mueller's words. So Who is lying? Must have been
Mueller as Barr's statement is unchanged. I think Mueller just found himself in peril of legal recourse as he has already destroyed his legacy. Mueller will be known as a partisan hack.

Lol, this "joint statement" actually says there is not difference between the two statements.

Nice claim / opinion...

Dude, you posted the fucking thing, didn't you read it?

From.your link:
The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.

 

[easyt65]

Innocence confirmed? Where?Just today he said Russia helped get him elected.

BULLSHIT! LINK....QUOTE...

THE ONLY PERSON IN THE 2016 ELECTION PROVEN TO HAVE RECEIVED ANYTHING FROM THE RUSSIONS IS HILLARY CLINTON:

-- A RUSSIAN-AUTHORED COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENT DELIVERED BY A TRUMP-HATING FOREIGN SPY THAT SHE PAID FOR AND THAT WAS INTENTIONALLY ILLEGALLY USED TO COMMIT FISA COURT ABUSES, PERJURY BEFORE CONGRESS, AND AN ATTEMPT TO ALTER THE 2016 ELECTION IN HILLARY'S FAVOR

AND

- MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN 'DONATIONS' TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION FROM THE RUSSIAN WHO LED THE KGB BANK'S EFFORT TO ACQUIRE URANIUM ONE....AND BILL CLINTON WHO RECEIVED A VERY LUCRATIVE SPEAKING GIG FROM TBE KGB BANK

 

[Darkwind]

What we need to be doing, now that Trump's innocence has been confirmed, is put pressure on him to balance the effin budget!!!

Innocence confirmed?

Where?

Just today he said Russia helped get him elected.

Got indictments?

No?

Innocence confirmed.

He did not say Russia helped him get elected. You guys did. Deal with it.

• 
  Donald J. Trump
  @realDonaldTrump

Russia, Russia, Russia! That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax...And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected. It was a crime that didn’t exist. So now the Dems and their partner, the Fake News Media,.

LMAO...

Wow, you're a moron. He just said he had NOTHING TO DO with Russia. I thought you guys said it was a done deal that they interfered. It seems Trump agrees with you. However, HE had nothing to do with is, as verified by half a dozen investigations.

So, he did not have anything to do with Russia's interference, and if anything, their interference helped the hag more than it did Trump.

Go cry somewhere else you fucking loser.

 

[lantern2814]

Hilarious...Mueller's Office backtracked / issued a 'clarification' of what Mueller claimed in his 'Drive-By' press conference yesterday (and his report), contradicting his own statements while shooting a huge hole in the snowflake narrative of how Trump was not found / declared 'guilty' because of the OLC decision that sitting Presidents can not be indicted....

"Mueller refused to allege a crime. So evidence of something -- something that wasn’t prosecutable right now, and that Mueller refused to suggest amounted to a crime for the future. Mueller himself said the investigation was justified because perhaps it would have resulted in evidence that “could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.” But Mueller didn’t charge co-conspirators in obstruction."


"Mueller’s second justification is more obvious: he essentially said he was doing Congress’ impeachment groundwork for them. “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing,” Mueller stated. This is an invitation to impeachment."


"A criminal investigation that cannot possibly result in charges is a conflict in terms. Mueller never should have agreed to such an investigation under the law, and Mueller’s own standard makes that clear."


DOJ, Mueller’s Office Release Joint Statement Clarifying Mueller’s Comments

That flatly contradicts Mueller's words. So Who is lying? Must have been
Mueller as Barr's statement is unchanged. I think Mueller just found himself in peril of legal recourse as he has already destroyed his legacy. Mueller will be known as a partisan hack.

Lol, this "joint statement" actually says there is not difference between the two statements.

Nice claim / opinion...

Dude, you posted the fucking thing, didn't you read it?

From.your link:
The Special Counsel's report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination - one way or the other - about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements.

And your name of Stupidus rings true again. You're so dumb you don't know when you're being trolled. Mueller embarrassed himself and his own office contradicted the lying Bobby. Barr likely won't be pleased and Mueller may face some problems later on.