Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 15,718
- 27,674
- 2,430
FBI received 'criminal information' from over 40 confidential sources on Joe Biden, Hunter, James: Grassley
Grassley alleges that the FBI and DOJ sought to shut down investigations into the Bidens
FBI received 'criminal information' from over 40 confidential sources on Joe Biden, Hunter, James: Grassley
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI maintained more than 40 confidential human sources on various criminal matters related to the Biden family, including Joe Biden, dating back to his time as vice president, according to information obtained by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.
www.foxnews.com
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI maintained more than 40 confidential human sources on various criminal matters related to the Biden family, including Joe Biden, dating back to his time as vice president, according to information obtained by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.
The confidential human sources "provided criminal information to the FBI relating to Joe Biden, James Biden, and Hunter Biden." Those confidential human sources were managed by multiple FBI field offices across the nation, including the FBI’s Seattle Field Office.
However, despite those efforts by the FBI task force, Grassley said in at least one instance, a confidential human source and its information had been vetted by multiple U.S. attorneys' offices, which found "no hits to known sources of Russian disinformation."
The revelations were laid out in a letter Grassley wrote to Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray late Tuesday night. The letter was exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital.
"Based on the information provided to my office over a period of years by multiple credible whistleblowers, there appears to be an effort within the Justice Department and FBI to shut down investigative activity relating to the Biden family," Grassley wrote to Garland and Wray. "Such decisions point to significant political bias infecting the decision-making of not only the Attorney General and FBI Director, but also line agents and prosecutors."
He added: "Our Republic cannot survive such a political infection and you have an obligation to this country to clear the air."
Grassley has been investigating for years information, records, and allegations from multiple Justice Department whistleblowers that indicate "there is — and has been — an effort among certain Justice Department and FBI officials to improperly delay and stop full and complete investigative activity into the Biden family, including but not limited to FD-1023s referencing the Biden family."Commentary:
Moe confirmation that multiple higher ups in the DOJ and FBI were Co-Conspirators in the Biden Crime Family racketeering enterprise...
Stasi Director Wray has explained that they were too busy arresting grandmas for waving signs in DC, setting up a bunch of militia nut cases in Michigan, and smuggling guns to Mexican drug cartels to get around to Hunter and Joe.
Perfectly understandable.
Meanwhile,
Siding with Trump, the ACLU says a judge’s gag order in Jan. 6 case is too sweeping
26 Oct 2023 ~~ By Carrie JohnsonThe American Civil Liberties Union sued former President Donald Trump or his administration more than 400 times during his tenure in the White House.
But now the ACLU is siding with Trump in the criminal case that charges he conspired to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power — telling a judge that a gag order she’s imposed sweeps too broadly in restraining Trump’s speech.
“f we allow his free speech rights to be abridged, we know that other unpopular voices — even ones we agree with — will also be silenced,” said Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the ACLU. “As much as we disagreed with Donald Trump’s policies, everyone is entitled to the same First Amendment protection against gag orders that are too broad and too vague.”
~Snip~
ACLU attorneys Brett Max Kaufman, Ben Wizner and Brian Hauss wrote that restrictions that seek to stop Trump from “targeting” prosecutors and witnesses are vague because it’s not clear what “targeting” might mean.
“In the context of the order, it could mean something as innocuous as ‘name’ or ‘identify,’ or something much more violent,” they wrote. “One could target another with respectful but vigorous political advocacy, or target them for
physical violence or death.”
Limiting Trump’s remarks about the work of special counsel Smith and his prosecutors risks undermining a vigorous debate about how public officials are doing their jobs, the ACLU wrote. The lawyers urged the court to “exempt public officials from the coverage of its order, except to the extent that it bars speech that threatens or instigates violence against, such persons.”
~Snip~
Trump lawyers John Lauro and Todd Blanche call the gag order in D.C. an “unconstitutional prior restraint” and have launched an appeal, which could help to delay the trial scheduled for March 2024. The judge has issued a temporary pause on the gag order while she awaits additional legal filings.
It appears that Progressives and Socialist Commies have infiltrated our federal agencies, and the courts.
Time to flush the system to cleanse these cancers.
