MSNBC hosts slam Trump support of Roy Moore, says GOP is 'party of pedophiles'

[Flash]

That idiot Jones is anti right to keep and bear arms. Who in Alabama would vote for a Libtard Moon Bat like that?

All Jones will do is resist Trump's agenda to make this country great again.

Between flawed Republican Moore and a Democrat Jones it is no brainer. Nobody would want another stupid libtard in the Senate. We have 48 of the little shitheads already.

Please stop lying. Even Scalia said that the 2nd Amendment was not without limits. And 97% of NRA Members agree with what Jones says here:

“We’ve got limitations on all constitutional amendments in one form or another,” Jones said. “I want to enforce the laws that we have right now. The biggest issue, I think, that’s facing the Second Amendment right now is that we need to make sure we shore up the National Crime Information System, the NCIC system for background checks, to both keep guns out of the hands of criminals, but at the same time, cut down on error so that law-abiding citizens can get those.”

Jones said he loves to hunt and has a case full of his own guns, but wants to make sure regulations are “smart.”​

Funny but Scallia is not around to tell us what his limitations are. We do know that he overturned two cases where the filthy ass government tried to curtail the right to keep and bear arms and that he stated it was an individual right, which the stupid Moon Bats hated. Of course we know that shithead Dough Jones is adamant anti right to keep and bear arms, which is the last thing the people of Alabama need.

 

[blastoff]

Watch as hosts on MSNBC just delivered a reality check to Donald Trump and the entire GOP over the president's recent support of Roy Moore following the sexual assault scandal that is growing by the day.


MSNBC hosts slam Trump support of Roy Moore, says GOP is 'party of pedophiles' [VIDEO]

the observation was true. But it won't matter a bit to trumptards who love themselves some sexual predators.

We love Bill Clinton?

Well, him or dimocrat Carlos Danger. It's good to have choices, and there's plenty more where these two scumbags come from.

 

[rightwinger]

Roy Moore may be a child molester

But he is a Republican child molester

 

[DrLove]

Funny but Scallia is not around to tell us what his limitations are. We do know that he overturned two cases where the filthy ass government tried to curtail the right to keep and bear arms and that he stated it was an individual right, which the stupid Moon Bats hated. Of course we know that shithead Dough Jones is adamant anti right to keep and bear arms, which is the last thing the people of Alabama need.

I asked you politely to stop lying about his position on guns. He's an avid 2nd amendment guy, gun owner and hunter who simply wants (like all normal people) to keep guns out of the hands of kooks and criminals.

This is the first thing you RW clowns do to all Democrats - "He's a GUN GRABBER .. AWWWK!!!"

 

[Avatar4321]

Well, depending on whom Alabama's voters elect, one may be able to say that Alabama's GOP is a party of pedophiles and moral miscreants. It's a bit soon to append that moniker on the whole of the GOP.

really? do you see the repugs on this board standing up against the child molester? or are they pretending every woman who tells what one of their precious rightwingnut idols does is lying?

I think its more we support due process. Especially when questionable stories come out right before an election

sure ya do...

why believe a dozen women who came forward and said Donald sexually abused them. why believe all the women who said moore was a child molester.

the "due process" is in the voting booth.

now stop lying... about pretty much everything you post.

No one has accused Moore of molesting children. If they did the very serious nature of the charges demands he be allowed a chance to face due process and his constitutional right to face his accused and put on a defense.

The fact that you want to ignore due process also weakens your accusations.

The fact that y'all Moorepologists keep trying to paint this as a crime scene betrays the disingenuousness therein.

It could be a crime but "crime" isn't the issue here and never was. The issue is and always was character.

So molesting children isn't a crime?

And yes it addresses character but its still a due process issue. If we treated it differently we would have at every election the media or elites don't like a candidate an accusation of this nature would be made to force the candidate out regardless of its veracity

 

[Flash]

That idiot Jones is anti right to keep and bear arms. Who in Alabama would vote for a Libtard Moon Bat like that?

Probably those who had a problem with Klanners blowing up a church and killing four little girls in the process, which Jones prosecuted and got convicted.

You remember, what Rump called "soft on crime"? Apparently there must have been "many fine people" in the Alabama Klan. Even if they hadn't invented Tiki torches yet.

Well that is just like the people that had trouble with rape not voting for that Slick Willy asshole, huh? Or maybe his sicko wife that viciously attacked the women that exposed Slick Willy being a sexual predator.

Since you are talking about racism (that is all you Moon Bats ever talk about) how about the dumbasses that voted for that Obama piece of shit that attended a church for 20 years that preached hate against Whites and Jews? They were pretty much scumbags, weren't they?

who did he rape, lying loon?
if you're talking about Juanita broaderick, she gave a sworn statement that it never happened and Kenny boy starr threatened her

You shithead Libtards believe the women that expose Republicans and attack the women that expose Democrats because that is just the kind of partisan assholes you are.

Dozen of women accused Clinton of being a sexual predator and one even saved the dress that had his cum on it. One credible woman accused him of rape.

It is really hypocritical how you stupid Moon Bats have a double standard when it comes to holding someone accountable for things like this.

I don't live in Alabama so I don't get a vote. However, if I did it would be a no brainer. Choosing a guy that went after a little jailbait forty years ago is a lot better than voting for a filthy ass Democrat that will oppose Trump's agenda to make this country great again. The people of Alabama deserve a lot better than an asshole that is pro abortion, anti right to keep and bear arms and is supported by the welfare queens and illegals. Democrats are the scum of this country. We got rid of 1,000 of the bastards nationally, got them out of the majority in Congress and don't have one as President. The last thing we need is one to represent a solid red state like Alabama. How dumb is that?

You stupid Moon Bats make the same kind of decisions all the time. For instance, you chose that asshole scumbag Slick Willy when he was exposed as a sexual predator. The same with his wife who attacked the women that exposed Slick Willy. Your Liberal agenda was more important that your morality. Don't complain when the people of Alabama do the same thing.

 

[Avatar4321]

Well, depending on whom Alabama's voters elect, one may be able to say that Alabama's GOP is a party of pedophiles and moral miscreants. It's a bit soon to append that moniker on the whole of the GOP.

really? do you see the repugs on this board standing up against the child molester? or are they pretending every woman who tells what one of their precious rightwingnut idols does is lying?

I think its more we support due process. Especially when questionable stories come out right before an election

I think its more we support due process.

Quite frankly, I don't think most of you realize there will be no due process in the Moore matter because of the statute of limitations, and I've not seen one of you advocate for repealing statutes of limitations for matters of sexual misdeeds.

Then what choice do we have but to presume innocence? Especially when the accuser refuses to allow testing of the one piece of forensic evidence?

Again, there isn't a piece of "forensic evidence" unless you have a stash of 38-year-old semen samples.

If you're referring to the yearbook, once again signing a yearbook is in no way a crime. It's irrelevant.

And once again this is not a crime scene investigation anyway.

The yearbook is still forensic evidence that can be used to support or undermine the accusers claim.

 

[Pogo]

really? do you see the repugs on this board standing up against the child molester? or are they pretending every woman who tells what one of their precious rightwingnut idols does is lying?

I think its more we support due process. Especially when questionable stories come out right before an election

sure ya do...

why believe a dozen women who came forward and said Donald sexually abused them. why believe all the women who said moore was a child molester.

the "due process" is in the voting booth.

now stop lying... about pretty much everything you post.

No one has accused Moore of molesting children. If they did the very serious nature of the charges demands he be allowed a chance to face due process and his constitutional right to face his accused and put on a defense.

The fact that you want to ignore due process also weakens your accusations.

The fact that y'all Moorepologists keep trying to paint this as a crime scene betrays the disingenuousness therein.

It could be a crime but "crime" isn't the issue here and never was. The issue is and always was character.

So molesting children isn't a crime?

And yes it addresses character but its still a due process issue. If we treated it differently we would have at every election the media or elites don't like a candidate an accusation of this nature would be made to force the candidate out regardless of its veracity

Again, due process refers to legal proceedings. This is not a legal proceeding. This is a series of personal anecdotes indicating a pattern of behavior.

Molesting children certainly is a crime, but that's not what the issue is here. Simple as that. You can certainly do something that reflects poorly on your character without being indicted for it, just as you can certainly be indicted/convicted of a crime without having done something that reflects poorly on your character. They're two separate things, even if they are related.

 

[Nosmo King]

What a problem! Abandon the moral high ground that serves so well when attacking the LGBTQ community, abortion rights and non-Christians or support an alleged child molester to make a political gain. What a prickly fence to straddle!

What to do about it? Well, first attack the messenger and ignore the message. That may lend some intellectual breathing room for those without much intellect. Next attack the opposition candidate as "soft on crime', in spite of the fact the opposition candidate prosecuted those who put a bomb in a Birmingham church resulting in the deaths of four little girls.

But history is a sticky wicket for the Trump crowd, as it is for the current President. So ignore history, attack the messenger and go for political expedience over the moral high ground?

Given the morality the President holds, that decision is a no brainer. A no brainer is calling the shots, after all.

 

[Avatar4321]

Roy Moore may be a child molester

But he is a Republican child molester

If he is a child molester no ones accused him of it.

 

[Avatar4321]

I think its more we support due process. Especially when questionable stories come out right before an election

sure ya do...

why believe a dozen women who came forward and said Donald sexually abused them. why believe all the women who said moore was a child molester.

the "due process" is in the voting booth.

now stop lying... about pretty much everything you post.

No one has accused Moore of molesting children. If they did the very serious nature of the charges demands he be allowed a chance to face due process and his constitutional right to face his accused and put on a defense.

The fact that you want to ignore due process also weakens your accusations.

The fact that y'all Moorepologists keep trying to paint this as a crime scene betrays the disingenuousness therein.

It could be a crime but "crime" isn't the issue here and never was. The issue is and always was character.

So molesting children isn't a crime?

And yes it addresses character but its still a due process issue. If we treated it differently we would have at every election the media or elites don't like a candidate an accusation of this nature would be made to force the candidate out regardless of its veracity

Again, due process refers to legal proceedings. This is not a legal proceeding. This is a series of personal anecdotes indicating a pattern of behavior.

Molesting children certainly is a crime, but that's not what the issue is here. Simple as that.

In other words crucify him! Facts be damned!

 

[Pogo]

really? do you see the repugs on this board standing up against the child molester? or are they pretending every woman who tells what one of their precious rightwingnut idols does is lying?

I think its more we support due process. Especially when questionable stories come out right before an election

I think its more we support due process.

Quite frankly, I don't think most of you realize there will be no due process in the Moore matter because of the statute of limitations, and I've not seen one of you advocate for repealing statutes of limitations for matters of sexual misdeeds.

Then what choice do we have but to presume innocence? Especially when the accuser refuses to allow testing of the one piece of forensic evidence?

Again, there isn't a piece of "forensic evidence" unless you have a stash of 38-year-old semen samples.

If you're referring to the yearbook, once again signing a yearbook is in no way a crime. It's irrelevant.

And once again this is not a crime scene investigation anyway.

The yearbook is still forensic evidence that can be used to support or undermine the accusers claim.

fo·ren·sic
fəˈrenzik,fəˈrensik/
adjective
adjective: forensic

1. 1.
   relating to or denoting the application of scientific methods and techniques to the investigation of crime.
   "forensic evidence"
   • relating to courts of law.

noun
plural noun: forensics

1. 1.
   scientific tests or techniques used in connection with the detection of crime.
2. informal
   a laboratory or department responsible for tests used in detection of crime.
   noun: forensic

Please tell the board in what way signing or not signing a yearbook is a "crime".

You're trying to blow this yearbook thingy into way moore than it is. No one cares whether Roy Moore signed a yearbook. What's at issue is what else went on around it.

 

[DrLove]

Funny but Scallia is not around to tell us what his limitations are.

Oh - meant to address this idiotic point.

Let’s take another listen to Justice Scalia in Heller, shall we? The Second Amendment, he stated, does not protect “the right of citizens to carry arms for any sort of confrontation, just as we do not read the First Amendment to protect the right of citizens to speak for any purpose.” He further noted that nothing in the court’s decision “should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”​

 

[Nosmo King]

That idiot Jones is anti right to keep and bear arms. Who in Alabama would vote for a Libtard Moon Bat like that?

Probably those who had a problem with Klanners blowing up a church and killing four little girls in the process, which Jones prosecuted and got convicted.

You remember, what Rump called "soft on crime"? Apparently there must have been "many fine people" in the Alabama Klan. Even if they hadn't invented Tiki torches yet.

Well that is just like the people that had trouble with rape not voting for that Slick Willy asshole, huh? Or maybe his sicko wife that viciously attacked the women that exposed Slick Willy being a sexual predator.

Since you are talking about racism (that is all you Moon Bats ever talk about) how about the dumbasses that voted for that Obama piece of shit that attended a church for 20 years that preached hate against Whites and Jews? They were pretty much scumbags, weren't they?

who did he rape, lying loon?
if you're talking about Juanita broaderick, she gave a sworn statement that it never happened and Kenny boy starr threatened her

You shithead Libtards believe the women that expose Republicans and attack the women that expose Democrats because that is just the kind of partisan assholes you are.

Dozen of women accused Clinton of being a sexual predator and one even saved the dress that had his cum on it. One credible woman accused him of rape.

It is really hypocritical how you stupid Moon Bats have a double standard when it comes to holding someone accountable for things like this.

I don't live in Alabama so I don't get a vote. However, if I did it would be a no brainer. Choosing a guy that went after a little jailbait forty years ago is a lot better than voting for a filthy ass Democrat that will oppose Trump's agenda to make this country great again. The people of Alabama deserve a lot better than an asshole that is pro abortion, anti right to keep and bear arms and is supported by the welfare queens and illegals. Democrats are the scum of this country. We got rid of 1,000 of the bastards nationally, got them out of the majority in Congress and don't have one as President. The last thing we need is one to represent a solid red state like Alabama. How dumb is that?

You stupid Moon Bats make the same kind of decisions all the time. For instance, you chose that asshole scumbag Slick Willy when he was exposed as a sexual predator. The same with his wife who attacked the women that exposed Slick Willy. Your Liberal agenda was more important that your morality. Don't complain when the people of Alabama do the same thing.

Learn more about double standards from reading Broke Loser's posts!

A child molester is preferable to a Democrat.

And yet President Clinton is thoroughly despicable.

 

[Pogo]

sure ya do...

why believe a dozen women who came forward and said Donald sexually abused them. why believe all the women who said moore was a child molester.

the "due process" is in the voting booth.

now stop lying... about pretty much everything you post.

No one has accused Moore of molesting children. If they did the very serious nature of the charges demands he be allowed a chance to face due process and his constitutional right to face his accused and put on a defense.

The fact that you want to ignore due process also weakens your accusations.

The fact that y'all Moorepologists keep trying to paint this as a crime scene betrays the disingenuousness therein.

It could be a crime but "crime" isn't the issue here and never was. The issue is and always was character.

So molesting children isn't a crime?

And yes it addresses character but its still a due process issue. If we treated it differently we would have at every election the media or elites don't like a candidate an accusation of this nature would be made to force the candidate out regardless of its veracity

Again, due process refers to legal proceedings. This is not a legal proceeding. This is a series of personal anecdotes indicating a pattern of behavior.

Molesting children certainly is a crime, but that's not what the issue is here. Simple as that.

In other words crucify him! Facts be damned!

Actually I don't think they use crucifixion any more, even in Alabama.

Might depend though on whether Judge Moore is presiding. You know, with his Olde Testamint fetish and all.
I bet he's handed down a few stoning sentences.

 

[Flash]

Funny but Scallia is not around to tell us what his limitations are. We do know that he overturned two cases where the filthy ass government tried to curtail the right to keep and bear arms and that he stated it was an individual right, which the stupid Moon Bats hated. Of course we know that shithead Dough Jones is adamant anti right to keep and bear arms, which is the last thing the people of Alabama need.

I asked you politely to stop lying about his position on guns. He's an avid 2nd amendment guy, gun owner and hunter who simply wants (like all normal people) to keep guns out of the hands of kooks and criminals.

This is the first thing you RW clowns do to all Democrats - "He's a GUN GRABBER .. AWWWK!!!"

You are confused about this Moon Bat.

When Dough Jones said he thought the 2nd Amendment had limitations that was him not understanding what the phrase "shall not be infringed" means. The last thing the good people of Alabama needs is a dumbass Lbtard that doesn't understand the Bill of Rights. We have enough of those dipshits in Congress already.

Just because you are one of the stupid Moon Bats that also doesn't understand what the right to keep bear arms is all about don't mean Doug Jones is an acceptable candidate for the good people of Alabama. They deserve better than an asshole that doesn't want to seal the border, supports abortion, wants to take away gun rights, increase the size of government and would constantly vote to oppose making this country great again.

 

[DrLove]

Funny but Scallia is not around to tell us what his limitations are. We do know that he overturned two cases where the filthy ass government tried to curtail the right to keep and bear arms and that he stated it was an individual right, which the stupid Moon Bats hated. Of course we know that shithead Dough Jones is adamant anti right to keep and bear arms, which is the last thing the people of Alabama need.

I asked you politely to stop lying about his position on guns. He's an avid 2nd amendment guy, gun owner and hunter who simply wants (like all normal people) to keep guns out of the hands of kooks and criminals.

This is the first thing you RW clowns do to all Democrats - "He's a GUN GRABBER .. AWWWK!!!"

You are confused about this Moon Bat.

When Dough Jones said he thought the 2nd Amendment had limitations that was him not understanding what the phrase "shall not be infringed" means. The last thing the good people of Alabama needs is a dumbass Lbtard that doesn't understand the Bill of Rights. We have enough of those dipshits in Congress already.

Just because you are one of the stupid Moon Bats that also doesn't understand what the right to keep bear arms is all about don't mean Doug Jones is an acceptable candidate for the good people of Alabama. They deserve better than an asshole that doesn't want to seal the border, supports abortion, wants to take away gun rights, increase the size of government and would constantly vote to oppose making this country great again.

Talk to Scalia about that

Justice Scalia’s Gun-Control Argument

 

[Flash]

You are confused about this Moon Bat.

If you voted for that asshole Obama then you voted for a scumbag that attended a hate spewing church for 20 years that preached hate against Whites and Jews and who damned the US. Also under him poverty increased, family income decreased and we had dismal economic growth, which hurt Blacks proportionally more than Whites.

If you care about racism then the last thing you would do is pick that creep Dough Jones. He is for abortion that kills hundreds of thousands of Black children every year. He supports Libtard economics that is designed to keep Black people poor and on the welfare rolls to have a voting block for the Democrat Party. He is for open borders that allow Mexicans to flood in to take work away from Blacks. He is against the right of a Black person to have a firearm to protect themselves. A very racist candidate. The people of Alabama don't deserve that.. do they?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Yea, um....the liberal bullshit propaganda isn't fucking working.

Keep it up, though....it's fun to watch. You have 7 more years of it, PROGS.

 

[Pogo]

I don't live in Alabama so I don't get a vote. However, if I did it would be a no brainer. Choosing a guy that went after a little jailbait forty years ago is a lot better than voting for a filthy ass Democrat that will oppose Trump's agenda to make this country great again.

This kinda sums it all up.

And the poster has no clue why.