JBeukema
Rookie
- Banned
- #101
Exactly my point.
Do you agree with this statement?
Just as anyone could deny anyone entry to their home or land for any reason, someone should be able to deny someone entry to their business for any reason. Private property is private property. Racism is a horrible thing, but people have the right to be racist.
??
Seems like a silly question to me.
It's a perfectly valid question relating to the role of government as it relates to property rights, the right to conduct or refuse business with whom you please, civil liberties, and the 'common good'. Are the rights of the racist shopkeeper more or less important than those of those oppressed by the system that was in place?
Was the legislation in question justified and warranted? Was it necessary? If so, is it still necessitated and justified today?