Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well now you are calling the FBI idiots, which is a great insult to those who do not abuse their powers.FBI found no improper evidence tampering from Hillary, same cannot be said of the witnesses that would take up Hannity's advice.
Then you just admitted some FBI personnel swept this incident under the rug and comitted crimes to protect Hillary, so now ask yourself who sent the orders to pretend what she did was not an issue?
Stepping deep into their own pile of words when creating fake news on what Hannity jokingly said about Mueller's probe suspects should in irony start smashing their phones, MSNBC explicitly said that would be
"a crime", well then there you go, admitting Hillary committed a crime but then the Cover up by Obama and his leftover henchmen was also an abuse of power, especially in creating a cover to those crimes by way of illegally bringing up false charges (another criminal act).
So while trying to be smart alecks, they accidentally admitted the serious crime of Hillary and bigger crimes in sweeping it away.
TECHNICALLY it would not be a crime to erase your phone, so MSNBC is wrong, everyone does it to avoid personal info from floating around, however if it's a subpoena involved and it is asked to be handed over like the Hillary incident, then it is a crime. Seriously, isn't there an IQ test for MSNBC hosts or do they get hired by Comcast the same way Comcast hires their brainiac billing dept personnel who keep charging you rent for your own paid for modem?
Idiot - do you know what the word ADMIT even means?
MSNBC admitted nothing of the sort.
FBI found no improper evidence tampering from Hillary, same cannot be said of the witnesses that would take up Hannity's advice.
Bullshit. Comey laid it out chapter and verse, but then stated that no "reasonable" prosecutor would indict. He never claimed she was innocent. Stop lying.
"In his testimony today before the Senate Judiciary Committee (on which I’ll have more to say in an upcoming column), FBI director James Comey has stuck by his claim that declining to bring charges against Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information was the right call because proof of intent was lacking. This is unsurprising. The director has repeated this analysis many times. It hasn’t gotten better with age, but given his insistence that “no reasonable prosecutor” could possibly disagree with him, I’m not holding my breath waiting for him to reverse himself."
James Comey: Hillary Clinton Lacked Criminal Intent, He Reiterates | National Review
so applying bleach bit and destroying hard drives in the manner she did - all normal procedure?Well now you are calling the FBI idiots, which is a great insult to those who do not abuse their powers.FBI found no improper evidence tampering from Hillary, same cannot be said of the witnesses that would take up Hannity's advice.
Then you just admitted some FBI personnel swept this incident under the rug and comitted crimes to protect Hillary, so now ask yourself who sent the orders to pretend what she did was not an issue?
You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about moron.
No I DID NOT ADMIT ANY SUCH BS. What I admitted was that FBI looked into the matter and CONTRARY TO YOUR CLAIMS found no evidence of deliberate evidence tampering. Not because they are idiots, but becacause that’s the fact of the matter.
so applying bleach bit and destroying hard drives in the manner she did - all normal procedure?Well now you are calling the FBI idiots, which is a great insult to those who do not abuse their powers.FBI found no improper evidence tampering from Hillary, same cannot be said of the witnesses that would take up Hannity's advice.
Then you just admitted some FBI personnel swept this incident under the rug and comitted crimes to protect Hillary, so now ask yourself who sent the orders to pretend what she did was not an issue?
You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about moron.
No I DID NOT ADMIT ANY SUCH BS. What I admitted was that FBI looked into the matter and CONTRARY TO YOUR CLAIMS found no evidence of deliberate evidence tampering. Not because they are idiots, but becacause that’s the fact of the matter.
so - when they come after trump, he can do a little hillary-house cleaning and you won't have a problem with it?
It's in their genesso applying bleach bit and destroying hard drives in the manner she did - all normal procedure?Well now you are calling the FBI idiots, which is a great insult to those who do not abuse their powers.FBI found no improper evidence tampering from Hillary, same cannot be said of the witnesses that would take up Hannity's advice.
Then you just admitted some FBI personnel swept this incident under the rug and comitted crimes to protect Hillary, so now ask yourself who sent the orders to pretend what she did was not an issue?
You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about moron.
No I DID NOT ADMIT ANY SUCH BS. What I admitted was that FBI looked into the matter and CONTRARY TO YOUR CLAIMS found no evidence of deliberate evidence tampering. Not because they are idiots, but becacause that’s the fact of the matter.
so - when they come after trump, he can do a little hillary-house cleaning and you won't have a problem with it?
Who used “bleach bit”? Hillary? No. Her IT was ordered to erase emails after she GAVE THEM TO CONGRESS, months before FBI request.
Why don’t you rightwingers stop posting ignorant bs and simply read up on the facts and findings instead of spreading bs?
you ever actually look up facts, or do you simply move history around to fit your views?so applying bleach bit and destroying hard drives in the manner she did - all normal procedure?Well now you are calling the FBI idiots, which is a great insult to those who do not abuse their powers.FBI found no improper evidence tampering from Hillary, same cannot be said of the witnesses that would take up Hannity's advice.
Then you just admitted some FBI personnel swept this incident under the rug and comitted crimes to protect Hillary, so now ask yourself who sent the orders to pretend what she did was not an issue?
You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about moron.
No I DID NOT ADMIT ANY SUCH BS. What I admitted was that FBI looked into the matter and CONTRARY TO YOUR CLAIMS found no evidence of deliberate evidence tampering. Not because they are idiots, but becacause that’s the fact of the matter.
so - when they come after trump, he can do a little hillary-house cleaning and you won't have a problem with it?
Who used “bleach bit”? Hillary? No. Her IT was ordered to erase emails after she GAVE THEM TO CONGRESS, months before FBI request.
Why don’t you rightwingers stop posting ignorant bs and simply read up on the facts and findings instead of spreading bs?
you ever actually look up facts, or do you simply move history around to fit your views?so applying bleach bit and destroying hard drives in the manner she did - all normal procedure?Well now you are calling the FBI idiots, which is a great insult to those who do not abuse their powers.FBI found no improper evidence tampering from Hillary, same cannot be said of the witnesses that would take up Hannity's advice.
Then you just admitted some FBI personnel swept this incident under the rug and comitted crimes to protect Hillary, so now ask yourself who sent the orders to pretend what she did was not an issue?
You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about moron.
No I DID NOT ADMIT ANY SUCH BS. What I admitted was that FBI looked into the matter and CONTRARY TO YOUR CLAIMS found no evidence of deliberate evidence tampering. Not because they are idiots, but becacause that’s the fact of the matter.
so - when they come after trump, he can do a little hillary-house cleaning and you won't have a problem with it?
Who used “bleach bit”? Hillary? No. Her IT was ordered to erase emails after she GAVE THEM TO CONGRESS, months before FBI request.
Why don’t you rightwingers stop posting ignorant bs and simply read up on the facts and findings instead of spreading bs?
FBI Admits Hillary Used BleachBit Software Designed to 'Hide Traces Of' Deleted Emails
Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) told America’s Newsroom on Thursday that Hillary Clinton used BleachBit software to hide all traces of her deleted emails.
remember - this is the same gowdy who has said there "spy" in trumps camp was legal. so is he wrong here, right there? probably but let's see if you twist life to fit here again.
Gowdy: Clinton used special tool to wipe email server
“She and her lawyers had those emails deleted. And they didn’t just push the delete button; they had them deleted where even God can’t read them,” Gowdy said Thursday morning during an interview on Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom.” “They were using something called BleachBit. You don’t use BleachBit for yoga emails or bridemaids emails. When you’re using BleachBit, it is something you really do not want the world to see.”
go ahead - spin it, doc.
if this is ok - just let me know cause that means trump can bleachbit his info also and hand the left overs to the FBI as evidence. you're setting a precedence here you really don't want to set.
then again, you don't give a fuck - you'll twist shit up to fit your views. again. and again.
and again.
And you continue playing Mr innocent You never twist the truth ?you ever actually look up facts, or do you simply move history around to fit your views?so applying bleach bit and destroying hard drives in the manner she did - all normal procedure?Well now you are calling the FBI idiots, which is a great insult to those who do not abuse their powers.FBI found no improper evidence tampering from Hillary, same cannot be said of the witnesses that would take up Hannity's advice.
Then you just admitted some FBI personnel swept this incident under the rug and comitted crimes to protect Hillary, so now ask yourself who sent the orders to pretend what she did was not an issue?
You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about moron.
No I DID NOT ADMIT ANY SUCH BS. What I admitted was that FBI looked into the matter and CONTRARY TO YOUR CLAIMS found no evidence of deliberate evidence tampering. Not because they are idiots, but becacause that’s the fact of the matter.
so - when they come after trump, he can do a little hillary-house cleaning and you won't have a problem with it?
Who used “bleach bit”? Hillary? No. Her IT was ordered to erase emails after she GAVE THEM TO CONGRESS, months before FBI request.
Why don’t you rightwingers stop posting ignorant bs and simply read up on the facts and findings instead of spreading bs?
FBI Admits Hillary Used BleachBit Software Designed to 'Hide Traces Of' Deleted Emails
Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) told America’s Newsroom on Thursday that Hillary Clinton used BleachBit software to hide all traces of her deleted emails.
remember - this is the same gowdy who has said there "spy" in trumps camp was legal. so is he wrong here, right there? probably but let's see if you twist life to fit here again.
Gowdy: Clinton used special tool to wipe email server
“She and her lawyers had those emails deleted. And they didn’t just push the delete button; they had them deleted where even God can’t read them,” Gowdy said Thursday morning during an interview on Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom.” “They were using something called BleachBit. You don’t use BleachBit for yoga emails or bridemaids emails. When you’re using BleachBit, it is something you really do not want the world to see.”
go ahead - spin it, doc.
if this is ok - just let me know cause that means trump can bleachbit his info also and hand the left overs to the FBI as evidence. you're setting a precedence here you really don't want to set.
then again, you don't give a fuck - you'll twist shit up to fit your views. again. and again.
and again.
USMB convicts Hillary, again.Stepping deep into their own pile of words when creating fake news on what Hannity jokingly said about Mueller's probe suspects should in irony start smashing their phones, MSNBC explicitly said that would be
"a crime", well then there you go, admitting Hillary committed a crime but then the Cover up by Obama and his leftover henchmen was also an abuse of power, especially in creating a cover to those crimes by way of illegally bringing up false charges (another criminal act).
So while trying to be smart alecks, they accidentally admitted the serious crime of Hillary and bigger crimes in sweeping it away.
TECHNICALLY it would not be a crime to erase your phone, so MSNBC is wrong, everyone does it to avoid personal info from floating around, however if it's a subpoena involved and it is asked to be handed over like the Hillary incident, then it is a crime. Seriously, isn't there an IQ test for MSNBC hosts or do they get hired by Comcast the same way Comcast hires their brainiac billing dept personnel who keep charging you rent for your own paid for modem?
Hillary smasher her Phone? When was that?Stepping deep into their own pile of words when creating fake news on what Hannity jokingly said about Mueller's probe suspects should in irony start smashing their phones, MSNBC explicitly said that would be
"a crime", well then there you go, admitting Hillary committed a crime but then the Cover up by Obama and his leftover henchmen was also an abuse of power, especially in creating a cover to those crimes by way of illegally bringing up false charges (another criminal act).
So while trying to be smart alecks, they accidentally admitted the serious crime of Hillary and bigger crimes in sweeping it away.
TECHNICALLY it would not be a crime to erase your phone, so MSNBC is wrong, everyone does it to avoid personal info from floating around, however if it's a subpoena involved and it is asked to be handed over like the Hillary incident, then it is a crime. Seriously, isn't there an IQ test for MSNBC hosts or do they get hired by Comcast the same way Comcast hires their brainiac billing dept personnel who keep charging you rent for your own paid for modem?
Context. None has ever said those phones were destroyed (a common practice when phones may contain sensitive data) after they were requested for inspection.Come on people. You know there is no evidence Clinton destroyed phones after they were requested for examination.
No sweetcheeks, it is well known that she had her minions do that dirty work for her....This is from NBC, not exactly a shrilary foe....
Yes, Clinton Phones Were Smashed. No, There Was No Acid.
“Thirty-three thousand email were deleted and acid washed. And the machines, the iPhones or whatever she was using, were whacked and, you know, destroyed with hammers. I would say there's something going on there.” — Donald Trump, 9/13/2016
That may sound like something out of a spy novel, but Trump’s description of how Clinton handled her mobile phones and email servers is partly true. One aide told the Federal Bureau of Investigation that he recalled destroying two of Clinton’s old BlackBerry phones with a hammer.
But Trump is wrong when he declared her emails were acid washed: Aides used BleachBit, a free program that deletes old files to free up computer space. There were no chemicals of any kind used to wipe the former secretary of state's private email server.
Additionally, Clinton deleted 31,830 emails, not 33,000.
Yes, Clinton Phones Were Smashed. No, There Was No Acid.
Context. None has ever said those phones were destroyed (a common practice when phones may contain sensitive data) after they were requested for inspection.Come on people. You know there is no evidence Clinton destroyed phones after they were requested for examination.
No sweetcheeks, it is well known that she had her minions do that dirty work for her....This is from NBC, not exactly a shrilary foe....
Yes, Clinton Phones Were Smashed. No, There Was No Acid.
“Thirty-three thousand email were deleted and acid washed. And the machines, the iPhones or whatever she was using, were whacked and, you know, destroyed with hammers. I would say there's something going on there.” — Donald Trump, 9/13/2016
That may sound like something out of a spy novel, but Trump’s description of how Clinton handled her mobile phones and email servers is partly true. One aide told the Federal Bureau of Investigation that he recalled destroying two of Clinton’s old BlackBerry phones with a hammer.
But Trump is wrong when he declared her emails were acid washed: Aides used BleachBit, a free program that deletes old files to free up computer space. There were no chemicals of any kind used to wipe the former secretary of state's private email server.
Additionally, Clinton deleted 31,830 emails, not 33,000.
Yes, Clinton Phones Were Smashed. No, There Was No Acid.
You are playing with straw men.
Translation: the OP is spot on and I have nothing substantive in responseMeaningless babble.
Context. None has ever said those phones were destroyed (a common practice when phones may contain sensitive data) after they were requested for inspection.Come on people. You know there is no evidence Clinton destroyed phones after they were requested for examination.
No sweetcheeks, it is well known that she had her minions do that dirty work for her....This is from NBC, not exactly a shrilary foe....
Yes, Clinton Phones Were Smashed. No, There Was No Acid.
“Thirty-three thousand email were deleted and acid washed. And the machines, the iPhones or whatever she was using, were whacked and, you know, destroyed with hammers. I would say there's something going on there.” — Donald Trump, 9/13/2016
That may sound like something out of a spy novel, but Trump’s description of how Clinton handled her mobile phones and email servers is partly true. One aide told the Federal Bureau of Investigation that he recalled destroying two of Clinton’s old BlackBerry phones with a hammer.
But Trump is wrong when he declared her emails were acid washed: Aides used BleachBit, a free program that deletes old files to free up computer space. There were no chemicals of any kind used to wipe the former secretary of state's private email server.
Additionally, Clinton deleted 31,830 emails, not 33,000.
Yes, Clinton Phones Were Smashed. No, There Was No Acid.
You are playing with straw men.
1) you are reporting fake commentary with no source proof, because you are only as good as your info, then you are subject to fail if your source is tabloid-esque propaganda.so applying bleach bit and destroying hard drives in the manner she did - all normal procedure?Well now you are calling the FBI idiots, which is a great insult to those who do not abuse their powers.FBI found no improper evidence tampering from Hillary, same cannot be said of the witnesses that would take up Hannity's advice.
Then you just admitted some FBI personnel swept this incident under the rug and comitted crimes to protect Hillary, so now ask yourself who sent the orders to pretend what she did was not an issue?
You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about moron.
No I DID NOT ADMIT ANY SUCH BS. What I admitted was that FBI looked into the matter and CONTRARY TO YOUR CLAIMS found no evidence of deliberate evidence tampering. Not because they are idiots, but becacause that’s the fact of the matter.
so - when they come after trump, he can do a little hillary-house cleaning and you won't have a problem with it?
Who used “bleach bit”? Hillary? No. Her IT was ordered to erase emails after she GAVE THEM TO CONGRESS, months before FBI request.
Why don’t you rightwingers stop posting ignorant bs and simply read up on the facts and findings instead of spreading bs?
and yet here you are!! hmmmmMeaningless babble.
The time she was supposed to concede & congratulate Trump on his victory, but couldn't because her phone was thrown against a wall and smashed into bits and pieces.Hillary smasher her Phone? When was that?
Did you even bother to read my post? Did all the conservatives forget how to read in comprehend?Context. None has ever said those phones were destroyed (a common practice when phones may contain sensitive data) after they were requested for inspection.Come on people. You know there is no evidence Clinton destroyed phones after they were requested for examination.
No sweetcheeks, it is well known that she had her minions do that dirty work for her....This is from NBC, not exactly a shrilary foe....
Yes, Clinton Phones Were Smashed. No, There Was No Acid.
“Thirty-three thousand email were deleted and acid washed. And the machines, the iPhones or whatever she was using, were whacked and, you know, destroyed with hammers. I would say there's something going on there.” — Donald Trump, 9/13/2016
That may sound like something out of a spy novel, but Trump’s description of how Clinton handled her mobile phones and email servers is partly true. One aide told the Federal Bureau of Investigation that he recalled destroying two of Clinton’s old BlackBerry phones with a hammer.
But Trump is wrong when he declared her emails were acid washed: Aides used BleachBit, a free program that deletes old files to free up computer space. There were no chemicals of any kind used to wipe the former secretary of state's private email server.
Additionally, Clinton deleted 31,830 emails, not 33,000.
Yes, Clinton Phones Were Smashed. No, There Was No Acid.
You are playing with straw men.
Not when the information on them has been subpoenaed.
huh?Did you even bother to read my post? Did all the conservatives forget how to read in comprehend?Context. None has ever said those phones were destroyed (a common practice when phones may contain sensitive data) after they were requested for inspection.Come on people. You know there is no evidence Clinton destroyed phones after they were requested for examination.
No sweetcheeks, it is well known that she had her minions do that dirty work for her....This is from NBC, not exactly a shrilary foe....
Yes, Clinton Phones Were Smashed. No, There Was No Acid.
“Thirty-three thousand email were deleted and acid washed. And the machines, the iPhones or whatever she was using, were whacked and, you know, destroyed with hammers. I would say there's something going on there.” — Donald Trump, 9/13/2016
That may sound like something out of a spy novel, but Trump’s description of how Clinton handled her mobile phones and email servers is partly true. One aide told the Federal Bureau of Investigation that he recalled destroying two of Clinton’s old BlackBerry phones with a hammer.
But Trump is wrong when he declared her emails were acid washed: Aides used BleachBit, a free program that deletes old files to free up computer space. There were no chemicals of any kind used to wipe the former secretary of state's private email server.
Additionally, Clinton deleted 31,830 emails, not 33,000.
Yes, Clinton Phones Were Smashed. No, There Was No Acid.
You are playing with straw men.
Not when the information on them has been subpoenaed.
Again for the slow of thinking: no one has said that the ones were destroyed after being subpeonaed. Destroying electronic devices that may have sensitive information on them is standard practice.
Now, try to refute what I said instead of building another straw man.
