Mouse Homosexuality Linked to Genes

eagleseven

Quod Erat Demonstrandum
Jul 8, 2009
6,517
1,370
48
OH
Homosexuality Linked to Genetics in Mice - TIME NewsFeed

Another of science's epic debates has finally been resolved: it turns out that homosexuality is genetic. (In mice, at least.)

According to a study published in the BioMed Central Genetics journalthis month, researchers from the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology were able to prove a link between genetics and sexual preference in female mice.

The procedure involved removing the females' (conveniently-abbreviated) FucM genes, which caused their brains to be masculinized—essentially turning the mice into lesbians. Researchers reported that after the gene was removed the mice “exhibited a masculine behavior, such as mounting to a normal female partner as well as showing a preference to female urine.”
The peer-reviewed article can be found here.

While any researcher can tell you that mouse studies never directly apply to humans, this does prove that homosexuality can be induced by genetic manipulation of mammals.



To think, a simple genetic deletion can cause homosexuality in mice...fascinating.
 
So what your saying is that the mice are genetically deficient?

Is this supposed to make the homosexual community happy?
 
So what your saying is that the mice are genetically deficient?
If we genetically engineer them to be, yes.

Is this supposed to make the homosexual community happy?
It puts another nail into the "homosexuality is a choice" coffin that Abrahamic religions love to push.

From a purely scientific standpoint, it is amazing that sexuality can be directly, and dramatically, controlled by standard genetic engineering techniques.
 
So what your saying is that the mice are genetically deficient?
If we genetically engineer them to be, yes.

Is this supposed to make the homosexual community happy?
It puts another nail into the "homosexuality is a choice" coffin that Abrahamic religions love to push.

From a purely scientific standpoint, it is amazing that sexuality can be directly, and dramatically, controlled by standard genetic engineering techniques.

Not so amazing really. I never doubted most human behaviors are Genetically related.
 
It might make people feel better to lie to themselves and others and pretend as if they have no choice over what they do in life. But no one will ever truly be free until they can stop lying about it and take responsibility for their choices.
 
It might make people feel better to lie to themselves and others and pretend as if they have no choice over what they do in life. But no one will ever truly be free until they can stop lying about it and take responsibility for their choices.
You can go on choosing your skin color, your family, your hometown, and your orientation, then.

I'll watch in bemused wonder.
 
It might make people feel better to lie to themselves and others and pretend as if they have no choice over what they do in life. But no one will ever truly be free until they can stop lying about it and take responsibility for their choices.

:clap2:
 
It puts another nail into the "homosexuality is a choice" coffin that Abrahamic religions love to push.

You and the persons behind the study seem to falsely assume this accounts for all homosexuality and that all sexuality if strictly genetically determined. Can you truly rule out psychological and environmental (eg: in utero) factors in all cases?
 
It might make people feel better to lie to themselves and others and pretend as if they have no choice over what they do in life. But no one will ever truly be free until they can stop lying about it and take responsibility for their choices.


Nice red herring, but the subject is strictly the role of genetics in sexual preference and gender
 
It puts another nail into the "homosexuality is a choice" coffin that Abrahamic religions love to push.

You and the persons behind the study seem to falsely assume this accounts for all homosexuality and that all sexuality if strictly genetically determined. Can you truly rule out psychological and environmental (eg: in utero) factors in all cases?
If you'll note, I said:

While any researcher can tell you that mouse studies never directly apply to humans, this does prove that homosexuality can be induced by genetic manipulation of mammals.

This is the first time that any genes were identified that directly control orientation in any species, hence the significance.
 
Nice try.

From the summation, emphasis mine.

The observation that FucM-/- female mouse exhibits a phenotypic similarity to a wild-type male in terms of its sexual behavior appears to be due to the neurodevelopmental changes in preoptic area of mutant brain resembling a wild-type male. Since the previous studies indicate that AFP plays a role in titrating estradiol that are required to consolidate sexual preference of female mice, we speculate that the reduced level of AFP in FucM-/- mouse, presumably resulting from the reduced fucosylation, is responsible for the male-like sexual behavior observed in the FucM knock-out mouse.
This clearly indicates that the homosexual behavior of these mice is due to a lack of the fucose mutarotase gene, which prohibits anomeric conversions of monosaccharides. This indicates, if the study actually bears up under scrutiny, that homosexuality in this mutation of mouse is linked to a lack of an enzyme, and not to genetics. I would also like to point out that not all of the mice ended up being homosexual, which actually adds weight to the argument that it is not genetic.

Time magazine ran an erroneous article because of their political views, and you fell for it. I could site a lot of articles like this one that caused MSM to tout something before science was ready to commit. I would be willing to bet that this study will be quietly discredited, just like every other study like this has been.

Any takers?
 
It puts another nail into the "homosexuality is a choice" coffin that Abrahamic religions love to push.

From a purely scientific standpoint, it is amazing that sexuality can be directly, and dramatically, controlled by standard genetic engineering techniques.

Actually, it is not.

All scientific studies like this that the media distort as proof that homosexuality is genetic is eventually discredited, which is why science tells us that environment has a stronger influence on sexual choice than genetics.

From a purely scientific standpoint, it seems people can be programmed on their sexual orientation. If that holds up to scrutiny it might do a lot of things, but it will not do what you are claiming.
 
clearly indicates that the homosexual behavior of these mice is due to a lack of the fucose mutarotase gene
The presence or absence of a given gene - genetics
which prohibits anomeric conversions of monosaccharides. This indicates, if the study actually bears up under scrutiny, that homosexuality in this mutation of mouse is linked to a lack of an enzyme, and not to genetics

That's not what you said a moment ago.
. I would also like to point out that not all of the mice ended up being homosexual, which actually adds weight to the argument that it is not genetic.

Actually, it backs the argument that it is not wholly genetic
 
Any takers?
Sure.

From the summation, emphasis mine.

The observation that FucM-/- female mouse exhibits a phenotypic similarity to a wild-type male in terms of its sexual behavior appears to be due to the neurodevelopmental changes in preoptic area of mutant brain resembling a wild-type male. Since the previous studies indicate that AFP plays a role in titrating estradiol that are required to consolidate sexual preference of female mice, we speculate that the reduced level of AFP in FucM-/- mouse, presumably resulting from the reduced fucosylation, is responsible for the male-like sexual behavior observed in the FucM knock-out mouse.
This clearly indicates that the homosexual behavior of these mice is due to a lack of the fucose mutarotase gene, which prohibits anomeric conversions of monosaccharides. This indicates, if the study actually bears up under scrutiny, that homosexuality in this mutation of mouse is linked to a lack of an enzyme, and not to genetics.
Your argument only makes sense if you ignore the central dogma of biology, that is:

DNA(genes) --> RNA --> Proteins(enzymes)

Genes themselves do not directly cause traits, but rather affect the body through producing proteins (including enzymes) which have thousands of uses all over the body.
 
This is the first time that any genes were identified that directly control orientation in any species, hence the significance.

Actually, it isn't, it happens every few years. In fact, I linked to a study about genes that were previously linked to homosexuality in mice that was proven not to have the same effect in humans.

Male Homosexuality: Absence of Linkage to Microsatellite Markers at Xq28 -- Rice et al. 284 (5414): 665 -- Science

I have little doubt that this one will also fall apart after further testing.
 
clearly indicates that the homosexual behavior of these mice is due to a lack of the fucose mutarotase gene
The presence or absence of a given gene - genetics
which prohibits anomeric conversions of monosaccharides. This indicates, if the study actually bears up under scrutiny, that homosexuality in this mutation of mouse is linked to a lack of an enzyme, and not to genetics
That's not what you said a moment ago.
. I would also like to point out that not all of the mice ended up being homosexual, which actually adds weight to the argument that it is not genetic.
Actually, it backs the argument that it is not wholly genetic

The gene that they targeted specifically removes a particular enzyme during the development of the mice. That may seem to you to be genetic, but it isn't.
 

Forum List

Back
Top