- May 20, 2009
- 144,832
- 67,375
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #21
Have you accepted the CO2 molecule as your Lord and Savior? Do 3 Hail Mary’s and 4 Mann’s Hockey SticksLike I said, it is as stupid as saying gravity plays no role in plane crashes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Have you accepted the CO2 molecule as your Lord and Savior? Do 3 Hail Mary’s and 4 Mann’s Hockey SticksLike I said, it is as stupid as saying gravity plays no role in plane crashes.
Arguing against climate change, is as stupid as arguing gravity plays no role in plane crashes.
This thread makes no sense.Which is the more valid theory: Gravity or Climate Change?
Though studied and tested for hundreds of years, gravity cannot account for what holds galaxies together and why galaxies fly apart from each other at an INCREASING rate. There are now several alternative theories including Modified Newtonian Dynamics.
A separate theory suggests that it’s electricity and plasma dynamics and not gravity that accounts for stellar formation.
That said, why are there soooooo many gravity Deniers publishing scientific papers at leading Universities but alternate Manmade Global Climate Warming Change theories are suppressed?
What’s the CC “theory”, where’s the lab work, where’s the evidence?This thread makes no sense.
A theory is a valid argument, or it is not.
There is no "more".
But climate change theory is definitely the most robust theory in history, in terms of the amount of evidence gathered.
Published in scientific journals. Go read the IPCC report.What’s the CC “theory”, where’s the lab work, where’s the evidence?
I’ve been reading the IPCC reports since they were first published. Do you know what’s NOT in any of them? Any experiment controlling for CO2. Maybe an additional 120PPM of CO2 makes temperatures rise 24F in a lab? Left up to the Consensus Cult, there will never be a published experiment!Published in scientific journals. Go read the IPCC report.
Do you think someone is going to knock on your door and spoonfeed it to you, like you are a quadreplegic shut-in??
Though we have no actual proof of how gravity works mechanically, it can be demonstrated to work time, and time, and time again...It can also be quantified and falsified....None of the previous can be said about the AGW hoax.
What a weird lie.I’ve been reading the IPCC reports since they were first published. Do you know what’s NOT in any of them? Any experiment controlling for CO2
Arguing against climate change, is as stupid as arguing gravity plays no role in plane crashes.
What a weird lie.
What a weird lie.
No I don't. I am not trying to talk you out of your fantasies. I am just providing the pushback you deserve.To call it a lie, you have to post the experiment. Can you do that?
First tell me what that experiment would look like.Please cite this experiment ..
No I don't. I am not trying to talk you out of your fantasies. I am just providing the pushback you deserve.
I find it strange that a grown man doesn't know the difference between "can't" and "won't".Do you find it the least bit strange that you can't point to one single experiment controlling for CO2?
That is such outrageous gobbledygook that it deserves no reply .A theory is a valid argument, or it is not.
A theory is simply the best available Hypothesis at a defined point in time .
But climate change theory is definitely the most robust theory in history, in terms of the amount of evidence gathered.#
Your bolded parts? Yes, quite idiotic. Tell us you know nothing about science without saying it. Oh, you just did.That is such outrageous gobbledygook that it deserves no reply .