Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's what I heard today. What's up with that?
That's what I heard today. What's up with that?
That's what I heard today. What's up with that?
That's what I heard today. What's up with that?
Sounds like you made something up. Shame on you. I hear all sorts of things everyday, lots of them stupid. I don't waste people's time with it unless I have a cite, though.
That's what I heard today. What's up with that?
Sounds like you made something up. Shame on you. I hear all sorts of things everyday, lots of them stupid. I don't waste people's time with it unless I have a cite, though.
It isn't made up konradv. Sorry to break it to you, but it is true. You would be hard pressed to find any scientist who doesn't depend on grant money to make his living who is on the AGW bandwagon and those who depend on grant money are in the very small minority.
The so called majority of scientists who support the hypothesis of AGW has been exposed as nearly as big of a hoax as AGW itself.
The so called majority of scientists who support the hypothesis of AGW has been exposed as nearly as big of a hoax as AGW itself.That's what I heard today. What's up with that?
Sounds like you made something up. Shame on you. I hear all sorts of things everyday, lots of them stupid. I don't waste people's time with it unless I have a cite, though.
George Mason University study figures out what I already knew: Climategate had a major impact on TV meteorologists | Watts Up With That?FAIRFAX, Va.—A new paper by George Mason University researchers shows that ‘Climategate’—the unauthorized release in late 2009 of stolen e-mails between climate scientists in the U.S. and United Kingdom—undermined belief in global warming and possibly also trust in climate scientists among TV meteorologists in the United States, at least temporarily.
In the largest and most representative survey of television weathercasters to date, George Mason University’s Center for Climate Change Communication and Center for Social Science Research asked these meteorologists early in 2010, when news stories about the climate e-mails were breaking, several questions about their awareness of the issue, attention to the story and impact of the story on their beliefs about climate change. A large majority (82 percent) of the respondents indicated they had heard of Climategate, and nearly all followed the story at least “a little.”
Forecastthefacts.org – Political Activists Gagging Our TV Meteorologists on Climate Issues | Watts Up With That?The front page of forecasthefacts.org has a list of who has been naughty and the statement:
In order to convince meteorologists to forecast the facts, we have to know where they stand. So we’re tracking meteorologists’ attitudes toward climate change across the country.
Activists want climate change on TV weather reports - Houston ChronicleLocal forecaster Gene Norman of KHOU (Channel 11) said he doesn't welcome being dragged into what he calls the politicization of climate science.
"I'm concerned about this 'Forecast The Facts' campaign and the underlying assumption that TV meteorologists are somehow misleading the public and are espousing some kind of scientific heresy," Norman said.
The campaign was spurred in part by a pair of surveys conducted in 2010 and 2011 by George Mason University.
Polarizing views
The first survey found that 63 percent of tele*vision forecasters attributed global warming to natural causes, while just 31 percent believed it was mostly brought about by human activity. More than one-quarter of respondents called global warming a "scam."
Thanks Ian. Was that so hard, everybody?
you should go out and get some google lessons if it's that important to you that everything be cited.
oh, and stop whining. it's unseemly
That's what I heard today. What's up with that?
Nobody believes the "human activity" stuff anymore.
It is, after all, 2012.
Nobody believes the "human activity" stuff anymore.
It is, after all, 2012.
"Nobody" must mean the other members of your therapy group in whatever nuthouse they have you locked up in.
except I can prove it s0n............you never bring dick to the table.Nobody believes the "human activity" stuff anymore.
It is, after all, 2012.
"Nobody" must mean the other members of your therapy group in whatever nuthouse they have you locked up in.