Discussion in 'Environment' started by Amelia, Feb 1, 2012.
That's what I heard today. What's up with that?
Ummm..........because they are not among the hordes of the hopelessly duped?
Sounds like you made something up. Shame on you. I hear all sorts of things everyday, lots of them stupid. I don't waste people's time with it unless I have a cite, though.
Where did you hear it, and why haven't you linked to it?
What's up with that?
It isn't made up konradv. Sorry to break it to you, but it is true. You would be hard pressed to find any scientist who doesn't depend on grant money to make his living who is on the AGW bandwagon and those who depend on grant money are in the very small minority.
The so called majority of scientists who support the hypothesis of AGW has been exposed as nearly as big of a hoax as AGW itself.
No cite, either!!! Self-serving anecdotes don't impress me.
Only in your deranged denier cult fantasy world, wiredwrong.
In the real world, your denier cult myths are a sad joke on the rightwingnut retards like you who fall for that moronic bullcrap.
about a year ago George Mason University conducted a poll about whether the Climategate emails had had any impact on various professions. Meteorologists were one of them, and they had more members that disagreed with the concept of AGW and its impact on weather than members that agreed. I may even have started a thread about it back then.
the present fuss is about a green/CAGW group that is trying to 'out' the 'deniers' and either have them fired or make them toe the 'consensus' line.
George Mason University study figures out what I already knew: Climategate had a major impact on TV meteorologists | Watts Up With That?
Forecastthefacts.org – Political Activists Gagging Our TV Meteorologists on Climate Issues | Watts Up With That?
a newspaper article-
Activists want climate change on TV weather reports - Houston Chronicle
that should get you started at least
News Desk: Al Gore on the Failure of Climate-Change Legislation : The New Yorker
deranged denier cult = Not Losing
The environmental radicals dont get that when you fuck around with the data, you lose all credibility, thus, you lose public support. Sorry......but thats how it works. Its time for the radicals to reinvent themselves because their hyper-alarmist strategy has been nothing less than a spectacular failure. Indeed..........who is it impressing?
...........except like minded radicals who continue to push the same agenda as if running into a wall head first. And you know what they say about people who keep doing the same thing over and over and over expecting a different outcome?
Thanks Ian. Was that so hard, everybody?
Separate names with a comma.