More than half of TV meteorologists deny AGW

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Amelia, Feb 1, 2012.

  1. Amelia
    Offline

    Amelia BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Messages:
    21,830
    Thanks Received:
    5,105
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Packerland!
    Ratings:
    +5,119
    That's what I heard today. What's up with that?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,197
    Thanks Received:
    2,912
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,208

    Ummm..........because they are not among the hordes of the hopelessly duped?:mm:
     
  3. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,552
    Thanks Received:
    2,555
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,666
    Sounds like you made something up. Shame on you. I hear all sorts of things everyday, lots of them stupid. I don't waste people's time with it unless I have a cite, though. :nono:
     
  4. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    Where did you hear it, and why haven't you linked to it?

    What's up with that?
     
  5. wirebender
    Offline

    wirebender Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,723
    Thanks Received:
    120
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    NC
    Ratings:
    +120
    It isn't made up konradv. Sorry to break it to you, but it is true. You would be hard pressed to find any scientist who doesn't depend on grant money to make his living who is on the AGW bandwagon and those who depend on grant money are in the very small minority.

    The so called majority of scientists who support the hypothesis of AGW has been exposed as nearly as big of a hoax as AGW itself.
     
  6. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,552
    Thanks Received:
    2,555
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,666
    No cite, either!!! Self-serving anecdotes don't impress me.
     
  7. RollingThunder
    Offline

    RollingThunder VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    4,398
    Thanks Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +886
    Only in your deranged denier cult fantasy world, wiredwrong.

    In the real world, your denier cult myths are a sad joke on the rightwingnut retards like you who fall for that moronic bullcrap.
     
  8. IanC
    Online

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,191
    Thanks Received:
    1,070
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,441
    about a year ago George Mason University conducted a poll about whether the Climategate emails had had any impact on various professions. Meteorologists were one of them, and they had more members that disagreed with the concept of AGW and its impact on weather than members that agreed. I may even have started a thread about it back then.

    the present fuss is about a green/CAGW group that is trying to 'out' the 'deniers' and either have them fired or make them toe the 'consensus' line.

    George Mason University study figures out what I already knew: Climategate had a major impact on TV meteorologists | Watts Up With That?

    Forecastthefacts.org – Political Activists Gagging Our TV Meteorologists on Climate Issues | Watts Up With That?

    a newspaper article-

    Activists want climate change on TV weather reports - Houston Chronicle


    that should get you started at least
     
  9. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,197
    Thanks Received:
    2,912
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,208
    News Desk: Al Gore on the Failure of Climate-Change Legislation : The New Yorker


    deranged denier cult = Not Losing


    :fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu::fu:



    The environmental radicals dont get that when you fuck around with the data, you lose all credibility, thus, you lose public support. Sorry......but thats how it works. Its time for the radicals to reinvent themselves because their hyper-alarmist strategy has been nothing less than a spectacular failure. Indeed..........who is it impressing?

    NOBODY


    ...........except like minded radicals who continue to push the same agenda as if running into a wall head first. And you know what they say about people who keep doing the same thing over and over and over expecting a different outcome?


    Mental Cases
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2012
  10. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,552
    Thanks Received:
    2,555
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,666
    Thanks Ian. Was that so hard, everybody? :dunno:
     

Share This Page