More porn, rape porn, in a school library as parents once again take it and read it to the school board.....

[HeyNorm]

You still did not answer the question.

Where was a question?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You’re a sad lil putz.

That means so much coming from you.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Where was a question?

Post # 44

 

[pknopp]

Can't agree with that.

I do not like this business of making really bad sex stuff be required reading in schools.

Nowhere did it say anything was required. It was noted it was in the library.

 

[HeyNorm]

That means so much coming from you.

Put a dress on Sally, you seem stressed.

 

[Seymour Flops]

There are a lot of things that are not pornography that should no be included in a school library.

Pornography or not, what is your stance on the book the OP discusses?

 

[pknopp]

You want him to light his hair on fire if he wishes teachers were reading that to kids? I think you phrased that incorrectly.

No, that is what he wishes was happening so there could be a legit argument, but that is not happening.

 

[HeyNorm]

Post # 44

When did you stop beating your gay lover?

 

[fncceo]

I know little about the book but from the descriptions, what we have here is not pornography. Graphic depictions of what sadly happens to kids far too often? Yes. Pornography? No.

Pornography is defined as; printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate sexual excitement.

The intent of the author is up to a court to decide if it comes to that. However, in cases of depictions (visual or texual) of under-aged children ... the courts will very heavily consider intent to be stimulation.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Pornography or not, what is your stance on the book the OP discusses?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

There's just too many on this forum defending child sexual abuse. Just too many

 

[Orangecat]

No, that is what he wishes was happening so there could be a legit argument, but that is not happening.

Unless you can post a link of him wishing that, you've employed a straw man argument.

 

[pknopp]

Pornography is defined as; printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate sexual excitement.

The intent of the author is up to a court to decide if it comes to that. However, in cases of depictions (visual or texual) of under-aged children ... the courts will very heavily consider intent to be stimulation.

See, "under age children". It was a 16 year old and based upon a true story. Heck, maybe her dad was a Southern Baptist.

 

[pknopp]

Unless you can post a link of him wishing that, you've employed a straw man argument.

He used the example, not me. This was not available to 2nd graders.

 

[Orangecat]

There's just too many on this forum defending child sexual abuse. Just too many

The left's gay agenda trumps children's innocence.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

See, "under age children". It was a 16 year old and based upon a true story. Heck, maybe her dad was a Southern Baptist.

A 16 year old is a child. The fact you think it's not is disturbing

 

[HeyNorm]

See, "under age children". It was a 16 year old and based upon a true story. Heck, maybe her dad was a Southern Baptist.

A child is legally defined as under the age of majority, in most states 18.

Perry Mason you ain’t.

 

[Orangecat]

He used the example, not me. This was not available to 2nd graders.

So post a link of him saying he wishes it was happening. Otherwise: straw man.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The left's gay agenda trumps children's innocence.

Not in my world

 

[Orangecat]

Not in my world

Nor mine. But looney-moonbat-land has a different agenda than that of rational adults.