More porn, rape porn, in a school library as parents once again take it and read it to the school board.....

[SassyIrishLass]

Nor mine. But looney moonbat land has a different agenda than that of rational adults.

They're too focused on children.... they don't realize we're onto them

 

[fncceo]

It was a 16 year old and based upon a true story.

Dear Penthouse Forum ... I am a 16-year-old boy from the midwest and I NEVER thought this would happen to me ...

Being allegedly based on a true story doesn't prevent us from questioning the motivation of the author.

There are many ways to describe a "true event" that are just as effective, while being less explicit and prurient. The explicit and prurient nature of the text is a clear indicator the text is meant to arouse and not instruct.

 

[Orangecat]

They're too focused on children.... they don't realize we're onto them

I don't think the majority of them want to harm kids, but they're just so bone-headedly stubborn and stupid when it comes to supporting their tribe that they can't rationally examine situations like this.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I don't think the majority of them want to harm kids, but they're just so bone-headedly stubborn and stupid when it comes to supporting their tribe that they can't rationally examine situations like this.

Idk but there's too many on here defending sexually abusing children and it's not from the right

Any of them that do? Probably a chomo

 

[HeyNorm]

Idk but there's too many on here defending sexually abusing children and it's not from the right

You would think that one would post that it’s horrible. But they don’t until they’re called out on it, then after deflection doesn’t work, a few will slink off with a……

Well maybe it’s not appropriate.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You would think that one would post that it’s horrible. But they don’t until they’re called out on it, then after deflection doesn’t work, a few will slink off with a……

Well maybe it’s not appropriate.

I know who they are

 

[Seymour Flops]

In my junior high in 74 - 76, there was a book of short stories as a textbook in an English class. Only three or four were assigned, but I read them all because I loved to read. In a book with about twenty stories, two of them featured male narrators who discuss their middle school-age daughters' sexuality.

In one, a dad talks about a time that his daughter and he were play wrestling as they had since she was little, and he touched her inappropriately. It wasn't explicit, but my impression (remember, I was fourteen at the most) was that he had cupped her boob and lingered long enough that it was obvious. The narrator describes the girl pulling away and saying she didn't want to play anymore. The dad laments that his daughter is now distant and aloof and he wonders if that is part of growing up, or due to the touching.

In another, a dad talks about his daughter on a ski trip with the family and she looked like a woman in her ski outfit and how he feels guilty that he thinks about her in a sexual way.

Even as a kid, it seemed creepy that a book for students would have two such stories. If it were only one, I might think, OK the editor didn't read close enough. But two was deliberate. Why? Why did the editors think that topic was so necessary for young readers? Keep in mind that neither story talked about the feelings of the young girl, just about the men. Playboy Magazine would have been a a better place for stories like that.

Imagine a dad who has sexual thoughts about his early teen daughter (or any daughter). Should he sit down with her and tell her about his thoughts? Why does she need to know that, unless he is warning her to keep her door locked? Should he do it just to get it off his chest?

Hopefully you are thinking, 'hell no!' How is it any better for the publishers to do the same?

 

[Seymour Flops]

My theory about why teachers and other educators are so often creepy around kids is this:

Many people are creepy or flaky in some way, and would act on it in some way if they were sure there would be no consequences. For most adults, there are consequences, so they hide their creepy/flaky side.

It's like the old days when male managers felt free to make jokes and comments to female subordinates that they would have never made to friends of their wives or mothers for example. Female subordinates use to be unlikely to complain about such boorish behavior, so those men got away with it.

Clarence Thomas was nearly blocked from the USSC due to an accusation that he had talked about "an alien pubic hair" and mentioned the name of a porn actor in conversations with Anita Hill while she worked for him. The idea was that it was sexual harassment since Thomas expected her to put up with it as a condition of employment.

How much worse for educators to take advantage of childrent legally required to be under the educators supervision seven to eight hours a day and subject them to sexual harassment far worse than ever alleged against Thomas.

 

[MisterBeale]

I agree the book is not appropriate for young children, but it is not porn.

I know little about the book but from the descriptions, what we have here is not pornography. Graphic depictions of what sadly happens to kids far too often? Yes. Pornography? No.

A lot of times, artists themselves, are victims of abuse. They do not understand, at that point, what is the line, for what is appropriate for public display, and what is not. They believe, since they are, "artists," and it is "art," anything goes, and the sky is the limit.

However, in our society, when it comes to children, there are certain limits and restrictions polite society expects, even in the realm of the arts.

I have a friend, who herself, was raised by a single mother, who was an addict. Her mother had let a series of bfs and step dads-abuse her for alcohol and drugs.

Now that she is grown, her photography and art, tends to be. . . . a little on the risky & outrageous side. I don't think she gives it much of a thought. She has even had it reported and it has gotten her kicked off of FB & Insta, several times for posting shit that looks like it should be hanging in a Podesta brothers' home. However, she is not a pedophile, furthest thing from, best, most protective heart of children anyone could imagine. (She is now in the middle of working on her child psychology Phd.) If any conservative saw her work, they would definitely think she was a pedo though . . .

Artists, sometimes, for whatever reason, need to just get it out, and express that, to the rest of society, it is what it is. If you haven't been abused, yes, it IS pornography. I don't know what, or why, but this shit tends to repeat itself in cycles.



So I get it, I get what the artist is trying to do, why they feel they must do what they are compelled to do, by being as shocking and graphic, in trying to convey the emotions as they do, and that some of them might have, noble and pure intentions; but you must also understand its real affects on the rest of society.

 

[pknopp]

A lot of times, artists themselves, are victims of abuse. They do not understand, at that point, what is the line, for what is appropriate for public display, and what is not. They believe, since they are, "artists," and it is "art," anything goes, and the sky is the limit.

However, in our society, when it comes to children, there are certain limits and restrictions polite society expects, even in the realm of the arts.

I have a friend, who herself, was raised by a single mother, who was an addict. Her mother had let a series of bfs and step dads-abuse her for alcohol and drugs.

Now that she is grown, her photography and art, tends to be. . . . a little on the risky & outrageous side. I don't think she gives it much of a thought. She has even had it reported and it has gotten her kicked off of FB & Insta, several times for posting shit that looks like it should be hanging in a Podesta brothers' home. However, she is not a pedophile, furthest thing from, best, most protective heart of children anyone could imagine. (She is now in the middle of working on her child psychology Phd.) If any conservative saw her work, they would definitely think she was a pedo though . . .

Artists, sometimes, for whatever reason, need to just get it out, and express that, to the rest of society, it is what it is. If you haven't been abused, yes, it IS pornography. I don't know what, or why, but this shit tends to repeat itself in cycles.



So I get it, I get what the artist is trying to do, why they feel they must do what they are compelled to do, by being as shocking and graphic, in trying to convey the emotions as they do, and that some of them might have, noble and pure intentions; but you must also understand its real affects on the rest of society.

Her books are reviewed by site after site. All recommend it.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Her books are reviewed by site after site. All recommend it.

Could you link some of those positive reviews? Not trying to sharpshoot you, I'd really like to read them.

 

[Ame®icano]

How dare you bring that up. Clearly these parents are all radicalized MAGA Republicans.
Not exposing your kids to LGBT+ pornography is just plain UnAmerican.

Left sure knows better than anyone what is the best for our kids.

 

[lantern2814]

There's just too many on this forum defending child sexual abuse. Just too many

But they don’t get warnings or bans. That only happens to people calling the perverts out on their behavior by using their own words.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

But they don’t get warnings or bans. That only happens to people calling the perverts out on their behavior by using their own words.

Yeah, it's concerning. I could go there but my alerts would go berserk.

That's a good indicator of moderation

 

[pknopp]

Could you link some of those positive reviews? Not trying to sharpshoot you, I'd really like to read them.

All you have to do is Google "book Identical".

 

[Seymour Flops]

All you have to do is Google "book Identical".

Uh-huh . . .

 

[sartre play]

Here is a hint. Don't like a book don't read it.
Realize that any time a book is banned at least ten times the amount of people go find & read it.
You can keep a young person to a narrow path, at some point most will look out side of that narrow view,
and make up there own mind. usually to discover that its not all that interesting.

 

[HeyNorm]

Here is a hint. Don't like a book don't read it.
Realize that any time a book is banned at least ten times the amount of people go find & read it.
You can keep a young person to a narrow path, at some point most will look out side of that narrow view,
and make up there own mind. usually to discover that its not all that interesting.

Defending rape porn book for children is not a good look.

And who said anything about banning it?

We don’t have Deep Throat in the library either. Are you claiming we should?

 

[MisterBeale]

Her books are reviewed by site after site. All recommend it.

That's fine, and of course this is what the battle if over.
Society's standard, seem to decline over time, don't they?

Whether or not, author's should be providing literature which informs children, tweens, and teens, that adults abusing them, is "normal," and they are not alone, is a valuable service, is of course, not debatable. But? The manner in which this is done? That is open for debate. Just because someone becomes a literary critica of not, does not mean, that they necessarily have child psychology credentials, or know what is best for society over the long term.

How graphic does it need to be? What really is that appropriate?

This is what the argument is about.

Some say graphic depictions are prurient and unnecessary, others? Believe it makes these works more real.

Just because they, "all recommend it?" Does not mean it is necessarily a good thing for society.

 

[2aguy]

The parents are taking the fight up a notch...the leftists want to continue to groom children...so parents will go after them....

The school board wars are turning up the temperature on porn-pushing administrators. In Fairport, N.Y., a group of parents has grown tired of asking for the school board to remove explicit books and materials from their schools. After months of asking nicely, speaking to the board, writing letters, and other efforts, the Fairport Educational Alliance has filed a claim against the board’s insurance bond.
----
The Fairport Police, the Monroe County Sheriff’s office, and the District Attorney have been notified of the intent to file criminal complaints and have received the material from the parents’ group asking them to review the board’s actions. Those complaints will have to be investigated and if authorities do nothing, they will have to explain why it’s okay for a school board to provide children with pornography, including child pornography (visual depictions of children performing sex acts), in violation of the law.




Some of the materials found in the Fairport schools are so vile it’s hard to believe. Some books include QR codes that lead children online to explicit porn sites, including one that teaches them how to use hook-up apps and meet up with adult sexual predators. It is unconscionable that any school official would defend this material.

Representatives of the group served the Fairport school board on Tuesday night after going over the multiple violations they found in the law.
-----
He then told the board what he found in the book Trans +, which the superintendent defended in a recent book challenge. “This book contains QR codes that take children to obscene sites that contain additional hyperlinks.” Among those links, parents found “everything you need to know about first-time anal sex, 17 next-level oral sex tips, when giving head use your tongue wisely, 4 tips to help you master blowjobs, and 13 top-rated vibrators to hit your g-spot,” and other inappropriate and clearly adult material.

Another book found in the school’s library, called This Book is Gay, instructed children how to use a sex app. The book encourages children to use sex apps to find the “nearest homosexual” to rape them. And that’s what this is, because children can’t consent to sex, nor can they legally use sex apps before the age of majority. Let it sink in that school administrators think it’s perfectly fine for the children in their care to use sex apps to be raped by the adults who use them.

NY Parents Set to Sic the Law on School Board That Insists on Porn in School

pjmedia.com