Cockroach still running from the truth like your kind runs when the light is turned on.They discredited themselves when they failed to prove their claims.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Cockroach still running from the truth like your kind runs when the light is turned on.They discredited themselves when they failed to prove their claims.
This is why felons don't get to become jurorsBy liberals who are happy the election was stolen.
Last I heard there is still no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Did I miss something?This is why felons don't get to become jurors
Judges have no backbone doesn't mean there is no evidenceLast I heard there is still no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Did I miss something?
Of course. You guys just "know." Evidence not required.Judges have no backbone doesn't mean there is no evidence
Cockroach still running from the truth like your kind runs when the light is turned on.
Eyewitness accounts the federal election commission chairman also said there were voting irregularitiesOf course. You guys just "know." Evidence not required.
Court rulings since the 2020 election have gone against the cheaters. Drop boxes ruled illegal in Wisconsin. Mail-in voting ruled illegal in Pennsylvania. More proof there was voter fraud in 2020.Eyewitness accounts the federal election commission chairman also said there were voting irregularities
And the Trump Russian collusion theorist's nut cases believe someone won an election who got small numbers to any rally they hadCourt rulings since the 2020 election have gone against the cheaters. Drop boxes ruled illegal in Wisconsin. Mail-in voting ruled illegal in Pennsylvania. More proof there was voter fraud in 2020.
Oh baby I can't wait for this trial!! The Big Lie is going down in flames, taking all Big Lie supporters down with it.
“Really crazy stuff. And damaging,” Fox Corp Chairman Rupert Murdoch said in an email on Nov. 19, days after the election, regarding claims Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani was making on Fox News.
“Sydney Powell is lying,” Tucker Carlson said in a text message to his producer. Meanwhile Laura Ingraham said in a message to Carlson: “Sidney is a complete nut. No one will work with her. Ditto with Rudy.”
“It’s unbelievably offensive to me. Our viewers are good people and they believe it,” Carlson responded, according to court papers. These messages came in the weeks following the election.
There you have it. Even the Fox news people, all of them, know that there was no election fraud. They admit there was no fraud... Dominion did nothing wrong at all and they are going to sue fake Fox news for $1+ Billion !!! Because the evidence clearly shows that Fox News people knew there was no fraud at all, yet the reported fabricated fake news of Dominion backed voter fraud that never happened.
You Go Dominion !!!!!
Expose fake Fox News
Fox News hosts, Rupert Murdoch were skeptical of Trump election fraud claims
Dominion Voting pointed to evidence that Fox News anchors expressed doubts in Donald Trump's false claims of a rigged election in 2020.www.cnbc.com
Hell son if a judge ruled McDonald's had to pay a customer for burning their lips on hot coffee how twisted does a judge have to be to ignore eyewitness evidenceYea, but still no evidence that would hold up in court.
There is no eyewitness evidence. Just so you know.Hell son if a judge ruled McDonald's had to pay a customer for burning their lips on hot coffee how twisted does a judge have to be to ignore eyewitness evidence
Yes most assuredly there is.There is no eyewitness evidence. Just so you know.
You are embarrassing yourself.Yea, but still no evidence that would hold up in court.
Come to think of it I do remember a law suit, I think I was living in Garden Grove back then, but the coffee burned other lips than you are talking about. I will see if I can find it. Yea, I was right, she sat the coffee in her lap and burned "those" lips.Hell son if a judge ruled McDonald's had to pay a customer for burning their lips on hot coffee how twisted does a judge have to be to ignore eyewitness evidence
That’s your rebuttal? I’m sure glad your not my lawyer,you would lose every car for me.There is no eyewitness evidence. Just so you know.
There are two realities.You are embarrassing yourself.
He sure embarrassed the paid shill for the dnc. This paid shill fir the dnc wants to tell us that mail fraud did not occur,that there were not more people mailing in votes in cities than their were people that lived in those cities even though it was told everywhere at the time,and that these postal workers who were willing to testify on vote fraud knowing the penalty of perjury were not credible whistleblowers or that presidential election fraud hasnot gone on fir decades now,they sure like to embarrass themselves with shit on theyr faces in embarrassment.this paid shill wants to tell us there are not thousands in dem city’s chanting let’s go Brandon.Eyewitness accounts the federal election commission chairman also said there were voting irregularities
You live in a fantasy where bigreb lives in reality,he has owned your ass and checkmated you in this entire thread.try to man up and not be a loser about being checkmated by him.There are two realities.