I submit to the Board that male homosexuality is a phenomenon that is totally different from lesbianism. They are not two sides of the same coin (as is imagined in the public sphere), but a coin and a dollar bill.
Men are carnal by nature. They are driven to copulate even before they know what copulation is. The drive is so compelling that many "heterosexual" men will go to extremes when confronted with a situation where normal copulation is not possible. Wasn't it Winston Churchill who said that the Royal Navy lived on "buggery and salt pork"? And in prisons, some men who would literally kill you on the outside if you "accused" them of being homosexual, are performing homosexual acts as a matter of course.
And consider, mens' desire to copulate is only incidentally relational. In other words, a man will decide that he wants to copulate with a particular female, not because he "loves" her, or even knows her. He may not even speak the same language. But if her appearance and mannerisms strike the nerve for him he will want to copulate with her. And that goes for men who intensely "love" their wives as well. Just because you love a woman doesn't mean that you wouldn't love to fuck Jennifer Anniston. And you would still love your wife afterward.
But "homosexuals" are men who, through some perverse practical joke by Mother Nature, are driven to copulate with other men. It is not a choice, any more than it is a choice to want to eat a hamburger when you are hungry. You can choose not to eat the hamburger - we do have free will, after all - but cannot choose not to WANT to eat the hamburger.
A final point on homosexuals: consider the ramifications to "social life" when both you and the objects of your lust are male. You are ALL carnal, all interested in copulation at virtually all times, until old age causes the desire to wane. Why do you think that AIDS made it around the world so quickly? Because queers were being monogamous? Seriously?
Lesbians, on the other hand, are not carnal by nature. Sex for women is mainly part of a relationship. Lesbians won't go to a gay bar and [do whatever it is they do] with multiple partners consecutively on the same night (as homosexuals often do - or at least used to do before the AIDS plague). Lesbians mainly want to find a woman with whom they can relate on a comprehensive level, including occasional bouts of mutual masturbation. promiscuity is not generally an issue with "committed" lesbian couples. Many women become "lesbian" because they simply cannot relate to men, and they "convert" when they finally meet a man that they connect with.
Homosexual men cannot convert. Believe it. It ain't happening.
Promiscuity is not an issue with male gay couples, because promiscuosity is expected and normal. In most cases, the ONLY thing keeping male-gay couples monogamous (when that occurs) is fear of catching The Bug.
On a related subject, although I am a "conservative," I have no objection to states sanctioning homosexual marriages. WGAS?
Men are carnal by nature. They are driven to copulate even before they know what copulation is. The drive is so compelling that many "heterosexual" men will go to extremes when confronted with a situation where normal copulation is not possible. Wasn't it Winston Churchill who said that the Royal Navy lived on "buggery and salt pork"? And in prisons, some men who would literally kill you on the outside if you "accused" them of being homosexual, are performing homosexual acts as a matter of course.
And consider, mens' desire to copulate is only incidentally relational. In other words, a man will decide that he wants to copulate with a particular female, not because he "loves" her, or even knows her. He may not even speak the same language. But if her appearance and mannerisms strike the nerve for him he will want to copulate with her. And that goes for men who intensely "love" their wives as well. Just because you love a woman doesn't mean that you wouldn't love to fuck Jennifer Anniston. And you would still love your wife afterward.
But "homosexuals" are men who, through some perverse practical joke by Mother Nature, are driven to copulate with other men. It is not a choice, any more than it is a choice to want to eat a hamburger when you are hungry. You can choose not to eat the hamburger - we do have free will, after all - but cannot choose not to WANT to eat the hamburger.
A final point on homosexuals: consider the ramifications to "social life" when both you and the objects of your lust are male. You are ALL carnal, all interested in copulation at virtually all times, until old age causes the desire to wane. Why do you think that AIDS made it around the world so quickly? Because queers were being monogamous? Seriously?
Lesbians, on the other hand, are not carnal by nature. Sex for women is mainly part of a relationship. Lesbians won't go to a gay bar and [do whatever it is they do] with multiple partners consecutively on the same night (as homosexuals often do - or at least used to do before the AIDS plague). Lesbians mainly want to find a woman with whom they can relate on a comprehensive level, including occasional bouts of mutual masturbation. promiscuity is not generally an issue with "committed" lesbian couples. Many women become "lesbian" because they simply cannot relate to men, and they "convert" when they finally meet a man that they connect with.
Homosexual men cannot convert. Believe it. It ain't happening.
Promiscuity is not an issue with male gay couples, because promiscuosity is expected and normal. In most cases, the ONLY thing keeping male-gay couples monogamous (when that occurs) is fear of catching The Bug.
On a related subject, although I am a "conservative," I have no objection to states sanctioning homosexual marriages. WGAS?
