The alleged "extreme right wing" made no such argument. SOME folks MIGHT have made an argument along those lines, but a dishonest fucker like Simpleholic will immediately take advantage of what ONE guys says and deliberately mis-attribute it to a whole host of other folks.
Are you claiming that Rightwingers all over USMB haven't been saying that violent rhetoric from the Right had nothing to do with it?
You use English like a jackhammer on a baby grand.
Listen you intentionally evasive and deliberately distorting scumbag, I was saying no such thing. And I'm not now. Nor am I saying the contrary, shit hole.
SOME liberals here at USMB, unlike you, ARE capable of intellectual honesty.
You should not over generalize.
If you ever care to TRY (for what may be the first time in your miserable life) to be both honest AND accurate, it is time to start properly employing modifiers and qualifications.
SOME liberals have intellectual honesty and integrity in debate here at USMB.
SOME right wing rhetoric has engaged in violence-laden imagery.
SOME of what many liberals point to as "violent rhetoric" from the right wing was never violent rhetoric in the first place.
Until you learn to regularly use proper qualifications for your assertions, much of the silly stuff you spew is a waste-land full of bullshit -- devoid of logical value.