man taken into custody for talking on cell phone

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by saltshaker, Jan 29, 2011.

  1. saltshaker
    Offline

    saltshaker Im over what damn hill?

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Messages:
    337
    Thanks Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Oxford, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +81
  2. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    You don't think that just maybe his also having a gun had something to do with the situation?
     
  3. Montrovant
    Offline

    Montrovant Fuzzy bears!

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    11,267
    Thanks Received:
    1,815
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Beyond the Veil
    Ratings:
    +3,359
    According to the article no weapon was found. It said that likely the person who reported him having a gun actually saw the cell phone.

    It was still a bit of a disingenuous title.
     
  4. saltshaker
    Offline

    saltshaker Im over what damn hill?

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Messages:
    337
    Thanks Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Oxford, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +81
    NO WEAPON was found.
     
  5. saltshaker
    Offline

    saltshaker Im over what damn hill?

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Messages:
    337
    Thanks Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Oxford, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +81
    Disingenuous? I don't thing so. Had he only been detained it would have been, but he was taken into cutody. That implies more than just being detained so they could verify the complaint. When they saw there was no weapon and that the person reporting was incorrect (mistaken) they should have simply stated that they were sorry and he was free to go.
     
  6. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,705
    They believed he was armed. They responded.

    He was 'acting erratically' and was taken into custody.

    That's all we know.

    Don't y'all want more info before drawing conclusions?
     
  7. saltshaker
    Offline

    saltshaker Im over what damn hill?

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Messages:
    337
    Thanks Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Oxford, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +81
    The police never said he was acting erratically.
     
  8. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    Wel he was in a Wal Mart parking lot ;)
     
  9. saltshaker
    Offline

    saltshaker Im over what damn hill?

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Messages:
    337
    Thanks Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Oxford, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +81
    I conclude that that could be seen as a negative. :lol:
     
  10. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,014
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,221
    I might, except he didn't have a gun.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

phone eratical