Mark Levin unloads on Obama in Hannity interview-video

[The T]

 

[francoHFW]

can someone please explain to me why people, on either side, listen to biased political opinion people (regardless if it's olbermann, hannity, rush or maddow)????

Because the Libs deal in facts, not BS spin, fear mongering, and lies? See sig pp3

 

[Mustang]

Mark Levin unloads on Obama in Hannity interview - YouTube

Two ultra conservative millionaire obfuscators who are worried their taxes will be going up rail against a Democratic president in their effort to hopefully unseat him in the coming election which is what they get paid to do on their respective radio shows?

That falls far short of shocking. It's not even remotely close to surprising. They're very healthy incomes are both directly tied to railing against Obama.

Now, just out of curiosity, what do you think would happen to their livelihoods if they ever praised Obama?

 

[francoHFW]

Birth control coverage SAVES money, dipsticks, and the church already HAD a one year waiver for discussion of this. Another manufactured BS Pub "outrage"...

 

[The Infidel]

can someone please explain to me why people, on either side, listen to biased political opinion people (regardless if it's olbermann, hannity, rush or maddow)????

Because the Libs deal in facts, not BS spin, fear mongering, and lies? See sig pp3

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5QGkOGZubQ]You Get Nothing! - YouTube[/ame]

 

[The T]

can someone please explain to me why people, on either side, listen to biased political opinion people (regardless if it's olbermann, hannity, rush or maddow)????

Because the Libs deal in facts, not BS spin, fear mongering, and lies? See sig pp3

Your first mistake is that YOU aren't a liberal in the classic definition. YOU are a Marxist/Statist.

Clear enough for you?

 

[Synthaholic]

That's just it. They can't show anything. Levin is a Constitutional Lawyer whom worked for Reagan. So these creeps have to lash out because they have no argument at all except thier own petulence.

Obama is a Constitutional lawyer, moron. Do you listen to him?

So some us of have heard. Nice that we see his end-runs around it ya fuckin' clod. He got caught going over his authority and attempted to dial back.

Too late.

Skipped right past post #27, eh?

Selective reading and understanding is a wingnut trait.

 

[Zoom]

Mark Levin unloads on Obama in Hannity interview - YouTube

I wonder if this guy will kill himself when Obama wins. Again.

 

[Synthaholic]

oh thats right the past presidents, Some who just striped americans of their constitutional rights, but no Obama is elected and its only him who has ever done it.

You stupid, ignorant fuck.

I don't see Shrub in that painting. Was it limited to elected presidents?

 

[Jroc]

What did you note that was inaccurate in what he said, foreskin? Just one or two specifics will be fine. Don't want to make you work too hard.

Like there were no taxes or regulations before Obama was elected.

You're about as dumb as they come, you little piece of shit.

From Bloomberg:


Obama’s White House has approved fewer regulations than his predecessor George W. Bush at this same point in their tenures, and the estimated costs of those rules haven’t reached the annual peak set in fiscal 1992 under Bush’s father, according to government data reviewed by Bloomberg News.

Obama’s White House approved 613 federal rules during the first 33 months of his term, 4.7 percent fewer than the 643 cleared by President George W. Bush’s administration in the same time frame, according to an Office of Management and Budget statistical database reviewed by Bloomberg.

Obama’s boom in job-killing jobs


President Obama can take credit for a boom in at least one economic sector: Since he took office, employment has surged 13 percent at federal regulatory agencies.

The regulators’ budgets are up 16 percent, according to a May report by Washington University and George Washington University. That’s before some major administration regulatory initiatives -- the financial-reform bill and the health-care overhaul -- are fully implemented.

Obama understands that a reputation for regulatory hyperactivity amid a weak economy wouldn’t help his re-election. In January, he promised “a government-wide review of the rules already on the books to remove outdated regulations that stifle job creation and make our economy less competitive.” That review led to some modest improvements: The Environmental Protection Agency pulled back a rule that would have treated dairy spills on farms like oil spills.

Overall, though, the regulatory burden is growing.

The new health-care law will force major fast-food chains to redo their signs to include calorie information -- a change that one CEO said would cost his company as much as building 1 1/2 new restaurants.

The EPA is moving ahead with plans to tighten restrictions on ozone. Hundreds of counties don’t now meet the standards; companies investing in them will face new obstacles. The EPA estimates the annual cost of the new rules will be at least $19 billion. The agency also plans directives on boilers, which manufacturers say would impose $14 billion in capital costs and make electricity service more prone to interruptions and more expensive.

Reviewing Government Accountability Office data, two Heritage Foundation analysts concluded, “No other president has burdened businesses and individuals with a higher number and larger cost of regulations in a comparable time period.” President George W. Bush, they note, was in his third year before new compliance costs hit $4 billion; “President Obama achieved the same in 12 months.”

Obama regulations strangling economy--Ramesh Ponnuru - NYPOST.com

 

[The T]

oh thats right the past presidents, Some who just striped americans of their constitutional rights, but no Obama is elected and its only him who has ever done it.

You stupid, ignorant fuck.

I don't see Shrub in that painting. Was it limited to elected presidents?

look right behind the O, dumbass.

 

[xotoxi]

Wm Henry Harrison should be lying on a hospital bed.

 

[xotoxi]

Mark Levin unloads on Obama in Hannity interview - YouTube

I wonder if this guy will kill himself when Obama wins. Again.

That would literally be awesome.

 

[Synthaholic]

Obama is a Constitutional lawyer, moron. Do you listen to him?

No he was'nt... he was a lecturer and that is all.

A "professor".....

Yeah right

All he is and ever will be is a thug.

You've never called White politicians 'thugs', you racist asshole.

 

[Synthaholic]

Like there were no taxes or regulations before Obama was elected.

You're about as dumb as they come, you little piece of shit.

From Bloomberg:


Obama’s White House has approved fewer regulations than his predecessor George W. Bush at this same point in their tenures, and the estimated costs of those rules haven’t reached the annual peak set in fiscal 1992 under Bush’s father, according to government data reviewed by Bloomberg News.

Obama’s White House approved 613 federal rules during the first 33 months of his term, 4.7 percent fewer than the 643 cleared by President George W. Bush’s administration in the same time frame, according to an Office of Management and Budget statistical database reviewed by Bloomberg.

Obama’s boom in job-killing jobs


President Obama can take credit for a boom in at least one economic sector: Since he took office, employment has surged 13 percent at federal regulatory agencies.

The regulators’ budgets are up 16 percent, according to a May report by Washington University and George Washington University. That’s before some major administration regulatory initiatives -- the financial-reform bill and the health-care overhaul -- are fully implemented.

Obama understands that a reputation for regulatory hyperactivity amid a weak economy wouldn’t help his re-election. In January, he promised “a government-wide review of the rules already on the books to remove outdated regulations that stifle job creation and make our economy less competitive.” That review led to some modest improvements: The Environmental Protection Agency pulled back a rule that would have treated dairy spills on farms like oil spills.

Overall, though, the regulatory burden is growing.

The new health-care law will force major fast-food chains to redo their signs to include calorie information -- a change that one CEO said would cost his company as much as building 1 1/2 new restaurants.

The EPA is moving ahead with plans to tighten restrictions on ozone. Hundreds of counties don’t now meet the standards; companies investing in them will face new obstacles. The EPA estimates the annual cost of the new rules will be at least $19 billion. The agency also plans directives on boilers, which manufacturers say would impose $14 billion in capital costs and make electricity service more prone to interruptions and more expensive.

Reviewing Government Accountability Office data, two Heritage Foundation analysts concluded, “No other president has burdened businesses and individuals with a higher number and larger cost of regulations in a comparable time period.” President George W. Bush, they note, was in his third year before new compliance costs hit $4 billion; “President Obama achieved the same in 12 months.”

Obama regulations strangling economy--Ramesh Ponnuru - NYPOST.com

So, Bloomberg Business News is not to be believed when they post facts but we are supposed to believe opinions from the Rightwing Heritage Foundation?


How stupid are you?

 

[Synthaholic]

oh thats right the past presidents, Some who just striped americans of their constitutional rights, but no Obama is elected and its only him who has ever done it.

You stupid, ignorant fuck.

I don't see Shrub in that painting. Was it limited to elected presidents?

look right behind the O, dumbass.

Damn, that's a terrible likeness.

ETA: plus, it's ignorant: wide lapels have not been in style since the 1990s.

 

[Jroc]

From Bloomberg:


Obama’s White House has approved fewer regulations than his predecessor George W. Bush at this same point in their tenures, and the estimated costs of those rules haven’t reached the annual peak set in fiscal 1992 under Bush’s father, according to government data reviewed by Bloomberg News.

Obama’s White House approved 613 federal rules during the first 33 months of his term, 4.7 percent fewer than the 643 cleared by President George W. Bush’s administration in the same time frame, according to an Office of Management and Budget statistical database reviewed by Bloomberg.

Obama’s boom in job-killing jobs


President Obama can take credit for a boom in at least one economic sector: Since he took office, employment has surged 13 percent at federal regulatory agencies.

The regulators’ budgets are up 16 percent, according to a May report by Washington University and George Washington University. That’s before some major administration regulatory initiatives -- the financial-reform bill and the health-care overhaul -- are fully implemented.

Obama understands that a reputation for regulatory hyperactivity amid a weak economy wouldn’t help his re-election. In January, he promised “a government-wide review of the rules already on the books to remove outdated regulations that stifle job creation and make our economy less competitive.” That review led to some modest improvements: The Environmental Protection Agency pulled back a rule that would have treated dairy spills on farms like oil spills.

Overall, though, the regulatory burden is growing.

The new health-care law will force major fast-food chains to redo their signs to include calorie information -- a change that one CEO said would cost his company as much as building 1 1/2 new restaurants.

The EPA is moving ahead with plans to tighten restrictions on ozone. Hundreds of counties don’t now meet the standards; companies investing in them will face new obstacles. The EPA estimates the annual cost of the new rules will be at least $19 billion. The agency also plans directives on boilers, which manufacturers say would impose $14 billion in capital costs and make electricity service more prone to interruptions and more expensive.

Reviewing Government Accountability Office data, two Heritage Foundation analysts concluded, “No other president has burdened businesses and individuals with a higher number and larger cost of regulations in a comparable time period.” President George W. Bush, they note, was in his third year before new compliance costs hit $4 billion; “President Obama achieved the same in 12 months.”

Obama regulations strangling economy--Ramesh Ponnuru - NYPOST.com

So, Bloomberg Business News is not to be believed when they post facts but we are supposed to believe opinions from the Rightwing Heritage Foundation?


How stupid are you?

it's all in the numbers idiot, it's what regulations cost buisness get it?

 

[Stephanie]

oh thats right the past presidents, Some who just striped americans of their constitutional rights, but no Obama is elected and its only him who has ever done it.

You stupid, ignorant fuck.

I don't see Shrub in that painting. Was it limited to elected presidents?

look right behind the O, dumbass.

 

[Peach]

I'm Shocked!

yeah but, did you learn anything about the Dear Leader?

Only the bullshit that a right-wing asshole like Levin spews out.

Levine advertises himself as MUSICIAN before his "professorship'. A complete RWN.

 

[Peach]

I'm Shocked!

yeah but, did you learn anything about the Dear Leader?

Only the bullshit that a right-wing asshole like Levin spews out.

Levine advertises himself as MUSICIAN before his "professorship'. A complete RWN.