Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I do. Unlike some on the Right, I don't want this country to be destroyed from within.You don't hope that.
All he offers is to make you idiots hate Americans.
Let's see: evidence presented to a grand jury that agreed and approved the charges and then presented to a judge.
Let's leave QAnon and 4chan and Levin out of it.
I do. Unlike some on the Right, I don't want this country to be destroyed from within.
Which indictment is bogus? Be specific please.Those who would try to bias an election with obviously bogus indictments, deserve much worse than just "hate".
The who republic is at stake.
Marxists don't like Mark Levin.^^^^^Levin is a POS, I've heard his rants. The question is, did Trump break the law? If he used his attorney to commit a crime attorney-client privilege is voided. That is the law and Levin certainly knows it.
All of them. Trump did nothing wrong. We are living in a radical, left, Democrat controlled D.C. dictatorship.Which indictment is bogus? Be specific please.
That's not true. I'm not a Marxist and I don't like him.Marxists don't like Mark Levin.^^^^^
Predictable Trump humper answer.All of them.
Wow! Where will you be moving to?It seem well past the time when the government of the country no longer has any value and is criminal.
It was bad enough when we started the illegal Spanish American War, murdered millions of Filipinos, sided with the assassins who started WWI, etc., but now we are on the verge of starting a nuclear war over the fascist racists in the Ukraine.
There was always hope things would get better, like we did eventually get out of Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.
But this election fraud, using bogus indictments, is way over the top.
There really is no hope of saving the government any more.
Paying money to a gold digger isn't illegal, and they sliced it up into 34 counts for 'intent' based on a one-sided grand jury finding.Predictable Trump humper answer.
So your claim is 91 indictments from 4 different cases with four different grand juries who had access to evidence you have never seen are all false... because?
Which indictment is bogus? Be specific please.
Yeah, there are a lot of stupid Marxist tools. Like you.That's not true. I'm not a Marxist and I don't like him.
Paying money to a gold digger isn't illegal, and they sliced it up into 34 counts for 'intent' based on a one-sided grand jury finding.
Retention of classified documents which is not illegal but, somehow they managed use the Espionage Act to charge him with obstruction of justice,
something called 'scheme to conceal,' and others for 'concealing' etc. They could charge Biden and other Presidents for doing the same. This is nothing but bullshit.
Jan 6: More false conspiracy charges.
False Electors: Alternate electors is not a crime.
You believe garbage. There is 0 evidence of Trump doing any of that. The assholes are trying to charge him with a violation of the Rico act which is a stretch and has NEVER been used for political persecution.
How could you possibly know Trump is not guilty of anything? Do you have access to all the evidence and testimony the grand juries had?What we have here is a radical Democrat Party using lawfare to get rid of a political rival. Trump is not guilty of anything, was a good POTUS and did nothing to harm America or the American people. That is why he leads everyone else in likely voter polls. You're either stupid, blind or just a partisan hack.
Calling the DOJ corrupt isn't half of it.
Beginning under Øbama it has become a festering cesspool to protect Democrats and all other members of the swamp/deep state.
It was Øbama who began ramking the DOJ into what it is nowm and enemy of Justice.
Jack Smith does not seem to care that this is not the Kosovo Special Prosecutor's office in The Hague. Donald Trump is not a war criminal. He did not commit acts of genocide. We have rules in our country, starting with the Constitution, as well as ABA and DOJ rules for prosecutors, and an entire system of evidence and procedures, that are in place to ensure that any individual, especially a candidate for president who is also a former president, is not treated as if this is some kind of Henry the VIII or, in modern terms, Stalinist "justice" system.Using attorney-client information as the basis for nearly 40 charges against Trump, incessant leaking of grand jury and investigative information to the press (in violation of the 5th and 6th amendments), and other abuses of power denying due process to Trump (or any defendant treated this way) guts our justice system. And all of this, in the aggregate, is a frontal assault on our federal election system, with a presidential election upon us in which Trump is currently the leading potential nominee to run against Biden -- whose DOJ/FBI is investigating and prosecuting the former president.Smith abused his authority in the pursuit of former Republican Virginia governor, Bob McDonnell. He was bluntly admonished by the Supreme Court's 8-0 ruling overturning McDonnell's convictions. He was bluntly admonished by a jury in North Carolina, when it rejected Smith's criminal charges against John Edwards, involving alleged federal election violations. In both cases, Smith, who was in charge of the Public Integrity Section of the DOJ Criminal Division, cut corners and essentially rewrote the relevant statutes. Smith encouraged the IRS to investigate numerous Tea Party groups, another outrageous attack on innocent citizens, for which the DOJ eventually apologized and paid over $3 million in damages. And this is the prosecutor, of a pool of thousands of current and former prosecutors, who Garland chose to destroy Trump, to imprison Trump, and to ensure that Trump dies in a federal prison.Per usual, Smith piled up charges against Trump, based mostly on attorney-client privileged information released at Smith's request, and on the order an Obama judge who despised Trump and ruled against him on every single motion before her. She was the chief judge in DC, and the so-called "motions judge," and has since retired and replaced by another Trump-hating Obama judge. Smith knew she would given him mostly what he wanted. The information involved in this seedy episode remains under seal, except to the extent it has been leaked most certainly by Smith's office.There have been over 40 material leaks of information relating to this investigation and the January 6 "case" in the last 6-8 months to CNN, Washington Post, and NY Times (obviously, all on the public record, and I've collected them), which assist the government's narrative and poison any jury pool. Smith and his comrades know the Democrat Party media will gobble it all up and regurgitate it just as he wishes (as they've done for the last 8 years, e.g., Russia collusion, etc.). All of this violates every legal and ethical standard put in place to prevent what Smith is doing. Yet, not a single judge, on his or her own, as admonished the government (which is responsible for overseeing the investigation, including improprieties such as leaks). Nor has the attorney general said a word about what his department is doing and how it is conducting itself -- other than stand behind "the good people" of the department. Ultimately, cf course, Garland is the captain of the ship and all that occurs on DOJ Titanic.Meanwhile, the same DOJ/FBI that sought to destroy Trump in 2016 and throughout his presidency, with chapter and verse of Stalinist-like misdeeds so numerous they're impossible to list here, set forth in the Durham over 300-page account. They're still at it. They've never left. And the same media spews the same spoon-fed government propaganda. The FBI/DOJ have the same mentality, the same Democrat Party-allegiance, exercise the same abuses of power, in their years' long hunt for Trump. Joe Biden, like Hillary Clinton, are protected, despite their myriad criminal activities involving documents and foreign money, but Trump is treated as a genocidal dictator given The Hague treatment over documents (the Espionage Act has never been used against former presidents or vice presidents and was never intended to be, regardless of disputes over documents, classified documents, storage of the same, etc.). Neither Hillary nor Joe have faced even criminal investigations, let alone by special counsels, into their egregious acts -- which supersede anything they can even concoct against Trump.See you tonight at 8 PM eastern on Fox.
Predictable Trump humper answer.
So your claim is 91 indictments from 4 different cases with four different grand juries who had access to evidence you have never seen are all false... because?
The fact they had to fall back on the disreputable grand jury is a sign there is no valid charge.
Grand juries have no judge or defendant lawyer, so prosecutors lie as to fact and law.
It notorious.
We know there can be no evidence of a crime because if there were any evidence, the prosecution would have started years ago when the event originally happened.
All we have to do is read the laws on classified docs in order to learn they are all Presidential Executive Orders, which is a clue as to how it is impossible for presidents to ever be in violation.
And since presidents can then give permanent copies of any classified doc they want to anyone, including themselves, that ensure ex-presidents then also are impossible to prosecute, legally.
We all know what an "insurrection" is because the country came from on, and we all know Jan 6 was not an "insurrection".
We also all have watched the John Edwards hush money trial, and all know that paying hush money is perfectly legal.
Trump defrauded the banks. That is illegal.The NY fraud legislation is about securities exchanges, and does NOT at all apply to mortgage applications. Trying to use a law improperly is a crime in itself.
Which indictment is charging him with paying money to stormy?
He was charged with obstruction because witnesses say he asked them to delete subpoenaed video and he asked his lawyers to lie about having the documents.
That is obstruction of justice plain and simple.
Which president did the same thing that Trump was indicted for?
It is when they falsify official documents.
He coordinated with false electors who falsified documents and made false statements in an attempt to overturn the election. That false under Rico laws.
How could you possibly know Trump is not guilty of anything? Do you have access to all the evidence and testimony the grand juries had?
If not I don't understand how you can make that claim.
As for the Stormy hush money indictment:
{...
Trump indicted over alleged Stormy Daniels hush money payment
A New York grand jury has voted in indict former President Donald Trump over an alleged hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the days leading up to the 2016 presidential election. This makes him the first former president to face criminal charges. NBC News’ Gabe Guttierez and legal analyst Danny Cevallos break down how Trump is reacting to the indictment and what comes next in the legal process.
...}
Trump only asked old video of the raid to be deleted, which they normally would do daily.
There was no obstruction since it was AFTER the raid was over.
All presidents save copies of classified docs for various reasons. One is proof, another is for memoirs, but they also traditionally did their own presidential libraries.
There are no such thing as "false electors". All elections always have electors for each party selected BEFORE the election. There is no way a candidate can effect them in any way. The elector's are known to the legislators and how they are required to vote, ahead of time. Elector fraud is totally impossible. Anyone claiming it is lying.
Link please.We all know it is impossible for Trump to have violated any law because we know that the law say and are for, and they can not possibly apply. For example, the NY fraud legislation is for securities exchanges, so can not possibly apply to Trump, who never went public or sold stocks.
