Marijuana and the definition of conservative

Amazing how you know that, yet still jump right in on things like global warming, which has the same amount of truth as reefer madness.

Not true at all. Global warming alarmist use the worst case scenarios that the scientist feel obligated to publish, even though those prediction are on the low probability end. Profiteer have been using the doomsayers or alarmist rants to produce docudramas which are ridiculous, and have most often over time proven untrue. These do nothing but foster doubt on science. At this point the weather patterns have not changed. The slight amount of warming attributed to mankind thus far hasn't really altered them yet. Who knows, maybe a warmer wetter planet will be better for life. I don't believe mankind will stop using the cheap energy that has fueled the industrial revolution

Adapt or die!
 
Amazing how you know that, yet still jump right in on things like global warming, which has the same amount of truth as reefer madness.

Not true at all. Global warming alarmist use the worst case scenarios that the scientist feel obligated to publish, even though those prediction are on the low probability end. Profiteer have been using the doomsayers or alarmist rants to produce docudramas which are ridiculous, and have most often over time proven untrue. These do nothing but foster doubt on science. At this point the weather patterns have not changed. The slight amount of warming attributed to mankind thus far hasn't really altered them yet. Who knows, maybe a warmer wetter planet will be better for life. I don't believe mankind will stop using the cheap energy that has fueled the industrial revolution

Adapt or die!

Co2 does nothing. The proof of that was the highly correlated raw data from the two and only two measures we had of atmospheric temp - satellites and balloons. In 2005, your side fudged both series to show "warming" that does not exist in the actual data.

In the past million years, Greenland froze while North America thawed.... How did co2 melt one and freeze the other at the same time?

The only organic raw data warming your side has ever had is from growing urban areas... Urban heat sink effect. If you take nature and convert it to Tokyo, you warm it 10 degrees right there.

The movement of the tectonic plates is the cause. Take 90% of earth ice that is Antarctica. It has 70 million year old Dino fossils on it. Those Dinos did not live at -60F on top of two miles of ice. Antarctica froze because it moved to the South Pole. 70 million years ago, Antarctica was halfway to Africa and still stuck together with South America....

Earth with two polar oceans - no ice

Earth with two polar continents, two antarcticas, would have 80% more ice than now.....
 
Co2 does nothing.
Debatable
In the past million years, Greenland froze while North America thawed.
The Ice sheet on Greenland is over 2.5 million years old.
The only organic raw data warming your side has ever had is from growing urban areas... Urban heat sink effect.
I wonder why the scientist didn't think of this and put their instruments in other places?
The movement of the tectonic plates is the cause.
Scientist do not know why we are in this Ice Age. They don't know why the glaciers retreat every 100 thousand years or so.
 
Since marijuana itself is so non-toxic that it kills nobody, what they are now doing is blaming all traffic fatalities on marijuana when it is discovered in the autopsy. Is that science? No. That is not proof of what caused the accident.

The other driver
A ringing cellphone
Bad road conditions
Driver has bad eyes and should not have a license

Those are not considered because the objective is not science,it is to blame reefer without proving reefer was the cause.

If marijuana "impairs," how did josh Gordon catch all those passes in the NFL?

As with algore's fraud, the taxpayer pays liars to fudge studies to align the message with the cause.

All traffic accidents are now because of pot... Never mind the other driver was over the median line and the car driven by someone with marijuana in his system was 100% safe and legal when the other car hit it....

Hey, I understand your desperation to defend your drug of choice. If marijuana has no debilitating effects on the body, why are you addicted? Why do you use it if it has no effect?

True, no one dies from THC poisoning as they can from alcohol poisoning.

I don't follow the NFL that closely. I did at one time, I was a season ticket owner of the Miami Dolphins that perfect year in 1972, yeah, I'm that old! I had no clue as to who Josh Gordon is or what he had done. Unlike you who goes forward regardless of whether you know anything about the subject or not, I checked.

He's an outstanding receiver who has destroyed his career and legacy due to drugs. You imply marijuana but do you really want to go there?

Josh Gordon has been suspended indefinitely for violating the NFL’s policies on performance-enhancing drugs. In the Uninterrupted interview below, Gordon reveals that he has used the following drugs:
  • Xanax (“many occasions”)
  • Cocaine (“several occasions”)
  • Marijuana (“most of my life”)
  • Codeine, cough syrup, promethazine (“very prevalent from where I’m from, you know, it’s what I grew up using”)

EMH, so that's your shining example of how little effect marijuana has on a person? Got it!

Please show us your reliable source and working links supporting your allegation that studies which show marijuana in a negative light, are fake and the result of the researchers being paid off.

Then you launch off into victimhood. ALL ACCIDENTS ARE CAUSED BY POT. That whining is just childish.

Please explain why you want to believe that marijuana is NOT an increasing problem with traffic accidents.
Effects-XL.jpg

According to you, those things have no effect on a person's ability to drive safely. Really?

But you claim that all the studies which prove that marijuana has negative, permanent effects on the developing brain are all fake and worthless. Got it!
 
I am not addicted to pot.

I recently passed a lab Corp drug test the honest way.

How long was it I stopped before being tested?

6 days. Not a problem. An inconvenience, but not a problem.


Apparently josh Gordon did go way beyond weed.

When he was first suspended he was with the Browns, and weed was the only issue. I believe Gordon has admitted that he was consuming marijuana before games where he torched opposing defenses who were focused on stopping him.

Play in the NFL long enough and the pain is too much for weed to remedy...

None of that changes the truth of josh Gordon's first few seasons with the Browns, where he performed at a hall of fame level....
 
Co2 does nothing.
Debatable
In the past million years, Greenland froze while North America thawed.
The Ice sheet on Greenland is over 2.5 million years old.
The only organic raw data warming your side has ever had is from growing urban areas... Urban heat sink effect.
I wonder why the scientist didn't think of this and put their instruments in other places?
The movement of the tectonic plates is the cause.
Scientist do not know why we are in this Ice Age. They don't know why the glaciers retreat every 100 thousand years or so.


Search for

Ancient Greenland green

And read.


They went up to Greenland and drilled holes in the thickest parts of the ice sheet, collected pine cones etc and carbon dated them. 400k to 800k years old. Greenland was completely green, except mountain tops, a million years ago.


Search for Atlantic Ocean floor
Click images

You can see the fault in the center of the Atlantic. It is angled so that it is pushing Europe and UK south east but on the other side it pushed Greenland north west...

Greenland had been moving NW.

North America moving SW.

That which moved north froze
That which moved south thawed.....

........


Ice ages - continent specific
 
According to you, those things have no effect on a person's ability to drive safely. Really?

Have scientist mapped the process of storing memories?

Cannabis may give you better balance and coordination for those use to it's effects. But seriously after about 10 or 15 minute playing time you'll burn it off, trust me!

It does give you euphoria and a little heighten awareness, not like acid or anything.....lol.

Holy crap, season tickets to the Dolphins in 72. Awesome. You are old! Haha. I was playing Jr High football that year, so I remember that team well.
 
Co2 does nothing.
Debatable
In the past million years, Greenland froze while North America thawed.
The Ice sheet on Greenland is over 2.5 million years old.
The only organic raw data warming your side has ever had is from growing urban areas... Urban heat sink effect.
I wonder why the scientist didn't think of this and put their instruments in other places?
The movement of the tectonic plates is the cause.
Scientist do not know why we are in this Ice Age. They don't know why the glaciers retreat every 100 thousand years or so.


Search for

Ancient Greenland green

And read.


They went up to Greenland and drilled holes in the thickest parts of the ice sheet, collected pine cones etc and carbon dated them. 400k to 800k years old. Greenland was completely green, except mountain tops, a million years ago.


Search for Atlantic Ocean floor
Click images

You can see the fault in the center of the Atlantic. It is angled so that it is pushing Europe and UK south east but on the other side it pushed Greenland north west...

Greenland had been moving NW.

North America moving SW.

That which moved north froze
That which moved south thawed.....

........


Ice ages - continent specific

I stand corrected. During the last inter glacial period, Greenland was mostly ice free. 125,000 years ago when temperatures were hotter than they are now. Not during the current inter glacial period.
 
A conservative, at least when that word had a real definition, meant being inherently against expanding government power and authority. Conservatism embraces freedom and privacy, and only real threat to others would justify changing and supporting increasing government at the expense of freedom and privacy.

You work a full day. You come home

You have a beer

Or

You have a bong hit


Neither activity would in any way bother a conservative. But here we are with self proclaimed "conservatives" embracing increased government power and authority at the expense of freedom and privacy over ... A plant.

Nice.


The origin of marijuana prohibition is a case study of the truth of conservatism, that big government should not be trusted, and that those in government will lie and spread fear and panic to keep themselves in power. The head of prohibition knew prohibition was going to be repealed (because the church going sub human morons who pushed it had no clue what they were doing, and in the end the American people figured out that al Capone was worse than alcohol). So this guy created a new issue, a new cause, to keep his job and title and budget etc. marijuana was the target. Using American taxdollars, this uber greedy kleptocratic traitor funded the making of mass misinfo about marijuana, most famously the movie Reefer Madness, which many morons still believe. In reality, by pushing marijuana underground, we enriched and empowered criminal elements here and abroad, and packed our prisons with people who are not a threat to society.

The war on marijuana is the epitome of BIG GOVERNMENT using lies, falsehoods, propaganda, and the law to do unreal harm to America and abroad for the sole purpose of enriching and empowering liars in government.

Nobody who opposes total marijuana legalization is in any way a conservative.

The pot haters are classic morons with bird brains filled with falsehoods who want big government to rescue them from the bogeyman.....

You're an idiot, nothing you typed is true.
 
A conservative, at least when that word had a real definition, meant being inherently against expanding government power and authority. Conservatism embraces freedom and privacy, and only real threat to others would justify changing and supporting increasing government at the expense of freedom and privacy.

You work a full day. You come home

You have a beer

Or

You have a bong hit


Neither activity would in any way bother a conservative. But here we are with self proclaimed "conservatives" embracing increased government power and authority at the expense of freedom and privacy over ... A plant.

Nice.


The origin of marijuana prohibition is a case study of the truth of conservatism, that big government should not be trusted, and that those in government will lie and spread fear and panic to keep themselves in power. The head of prohibition knew prohibition was going to be repealed (because the church going sub human morons who pushed it had no clue what they were doing, and in the end the American people figured out that al Capone was worse than alcohol). So this guy created a new issue, a new cause, to keep his job and title and budget etc. marijuana was the target. Using American taxdollars, this uber greedy kleptocratic traitor funded the making of mass misinfo about marijuana, most famously the movie Reefer Madness, which many morons still believe. In reality, by pushing marijuana underground, we enriched and empowered criminal elements here and abroad, and packed our prisons with people who are not a threat to society.

The war on marijuana is the epitome of BIG GOVERNMENT using lies, falsehoods, propaganda, and the law to do unreal harm to America and abroad for the sole purpose of enriching and empowering liars in government.

Nobody who opposes total marijuana legalization is in any way a conservative.

The pot haters are classic morons with bird brains filled with falsehoods who want big government to rescue them from the bogeyman.....
Just make sure warnings come with usage.
And imprison anyone who subjects another to their pot use while in public or involving another’s property…




At some point, just parroting these endless taxpayer funded fear pieces should succumb to the actual lives you observe.

Mick Jagger - major life long marijuana user - singing and dancing in his late 70s.... Major talent.
Willie Nelson - well, can't dance but the rest is the same
Michael phelps - world's greatest ever swimmer, bong user.
Josh Gordon - played NFL WR at HOF level while consuming marijuana regularly


Government lies.

It lies to scare people out of rights and wealth and freedom.

Marijuana is exhibit A of that truth

Do some unbiased research into marijuana, don't just look for what you are desperate to find.

Yeah, what can go wrong with a little marijuana use?

Drugs-S.gif


You did a reefer madness there.

Post the marijuana death stats..

Lol


There aren't any. You just posted a photo of someone in serious condition.

Marijuana PROHIBITION causes thousand fold more deaths than marijuana.

Their blood is on your beak, birdbrained liar....



.


Since marijuana itself is so non-toxic that it kills nobody, what they are now doing is blaming all traffic fatalities on marijuana when it is discovered in the autopsy. Is that science? No. That is not proof of what caused the accident.

The other driver
A ringing cellphone
Bad road conditions
Driver has bad eyes and should not have a license

Those are not considered because the objective is not science,it is to blame reefer without proving reefer was the cause.

If marijuana "impairs," how did josh Gordon catch all those passes in the NFL?

As with algore's fraud, the taxpayer pays liars to fudge studies to align the message with the cause.

All traffic accidents are now because of pot... Never mind the other driver was over the median line and the car driven by someone with marijuana in his system was 100% safe and legal when the other car hit it....


Just FOAD liar. You're propaganda ain't selling in the medical community. They've pulled bodies out of cars with 38 times the legal limit for THC, now why don't you lie again and tell us that's not enough for impairment. You're just a fucking joke like the other stoner.

.
 
Last edited:
A conservative, at least when that word had a real definition, meant being inherently against expanding government power and authority. Conservatism embraces freedom and privacy, and only real threat to others would justify changing and supporting increasing government at the expense of freedom and privacy.

You work a full day. You come home

You have a beer

Or

You have a bong hit


Neither activity would in any way bother a conservative. But here we are with self proclaimed "conservatives" embracing increased government power and authority at the expense of freedom and privacy over ... A plant.

Nice.


The origin of marijuana prohibition is a case study of the truth of conservatism, that big government should not be trusted, and that those in government will lie and spread fear and panic to keep themselves in power. The head of prohibition knew prohibition was going to be repealed (because the church going sub human morons who pushed it had no clue what they were doing, and in the end the American people figured out that al Capone was worse than alcohol). So this guy created a new issue, a new cause, to keep his job and title and budget etc. marijuana was the target. Using American taxdollars, this uber greedy kleptocratic traitor funded the making of mass misinfo about marijuana, most famously the movie Reefer Madness, which many morons still believe. In reality, by pushing marijuana underground, we enriched and empowered criminal elements here and abroad, and packed our prisons with people who are not a threat to society.

The war on marijuana is the epitome of BIG GOVERNMENT using lies, falsehoods, propaganda, and the law to do unreal harm to America and abroad for the sole purpose of enriching and empowering liars in government.

Nobody who opposes total marijuana legalization is in any way a conservative.

The pot haters are classic morons with bird brains filled with falsehoods who want big government to rescue them from the bogeyman.....
Just make sure warnings come with usage.
And imprison anyone who subjects another to their pot use while in public or involving another’s property…




At some point, just parroting these endless taxpayer funded fear pieces should succumb to the actual lives you observe.

Mick Jagger - major life long marijuana user - singing and dancing in his late 70s.... Major talent.
Willie Nelson - well, can't dance but the rest is the same
Michael phelps - world's greatest ever swimmer, bong user.
Josh Gordon - played NFL WR at HOF level while consuming marijuana regularly


Government lies.

It lies to scare people out of rights and wealth and freedom.

Marijuana is exhibit A of that truth

Do some unbiased research into marijuana, don't just look for what you are desperate to find.

Yeah, what can go wrong with a little marijuana use?

Drugs-S.gif


You did a reefer madness there.

Post the marijuana death stats..

Lol


There aren't any. You just posted a photo of someone in serious condition.

Marijuana PROHIBITION causes thousand fold more deaths than marijuana.

Their blood is on your beak, birdbrained liar....



.


Since marijuana itself is so non-toxic that it kills nobody, what they are now doing is blaming all traffic fatalities on marijuana when it is discovered in the autopsy. Is that science? No. That is not proof of what caused the accident.

The other driver
A ringing cellphone
Bad road conditions
Driver has bad eyes and should not have a license

Those are not considered because the objective is not science,it is to blame reefer without proving reefer was the cause.

If marijuana "impairs," how did josh Gordon catch all those passes in the NFL?

As with algore's fraud, the taxpayer pays liars to fudge studies to align the message with the cause.

All traffic accidents are now because of pot... Never mind the other driver was over the median line and the car driven by someone with marijuana in his system was 100% safe and legal when the other car hit it....


Just FOAD liar. You're propaganda ain't selling in the medical community. They've pulled bodies out of cars with 38 times the legal limit for THC, now why don't you lie again and tell us that's not enough for impairment. You're just a fucking joke like the other stoner.

.


If you drink 38 times the recommended dose of cough syrup, you likely are not fit to drive either. The decision to start your car and drive is your decision. You need to assess whether or not you are impaired. It is, of course, the jackasses who drive at 0.5 and wreck. That is not the fault of the majority of people who respsonsibly consume alcohol and know not to drive when impaired.

The difference,of course, is that Josh Gordon would not have 200 receiving yards and 3 TDs if he drank before the game. Instead, he toked, and proved to every sane human with an IQ over 5 that he was not impaired.

It is a tribute to just how relatively harmless marijuana is that your pathetically dishonest and hateful side has to stoop to 38 times the normal dose to document impairment.....

You never get to 38 times on alcohol, because at 10 times, you die...
 
A conservative, at least when that word had a real definition, meant being inherently against expanding government power and authority. Conservatism embraces freedom and privacy, and only real threat to others would justify changing and supporting increasing government at the expense of freedom and privacy.

You work a full day. You come home

You have a beer

Or

You have a bong hit


Neither activity would in any way bother a conservative. But here we are with self proclaimed "conservatives" embracing increased government power and authority at the expense of freedom and privacy over ... A plant.

Nice.


The origin of marijuana prohibition is a case study of the truth of conservatism, that big government should not be trusted, and that those in government will lie and spread fear and panic to keep themselves in power. The head of prohibition knew prohibition was going to be repealed (because the church going sub human morons who pushed it had no clue what they were doing, and in the end the American people figured out that al Capone was worse than alcohol). So this guy created a new issue, a new cause, to keep his job and title and budget etc. marijuana was the target. Using American taxdollars, this uber greedy kleptocratic traitor funded the making of mass misinfo about marijuana, most famously the movie Reefer Madness, which many morons still believe. In reality, by pushing marijuana underground, we enriched and empowered criminal elements here and abroad, and packed our prisons with people who are not a threat to society.

The war on marijuana is the epitome of BIG GOVERNMENT using lies, falsehoods, propaganda, and the law to do unreal harm to America and abroad for the sole purpose of enriching and empowering liars in government.

Nobody who opposes total marijuana legalization is in any way a conservative.

The pot haters are classic morons with bird brains filled with falsehoods who want big government to rescue them from the bogeyman.....
Just make sure warnings come with usage.
And imprison anyone who subjects another to their pot use while in public or involving another’s property…




At some point, just parroting these endless taxpayer funded fear pieces should succumb to the actual lives you observe.

Mick Jagger - major life long marijuana user - singing and dancing in his late 70s.... Major talent.
Willie Nelson - well, can't dance but the rest is the same
Michael phelps - world's greatest ever swimmer, bong user.
Josh Gordon - played NFL WR at HOF level while consuming marijuana regularly


Government lies.

It lies to scare people out of rights and wealth and freedom.

Marijuana is exhibit A of that truth

Do some unbiased research into marijuana, don't just look for what you are desperate to find.

Yeah, what can go wrong with a little marijuana use?

Drugs-S.gif


You did a reefer madness there.

Post the marijuana death stats..

Lol


There aren't any. You just posted a photo of someone in serious condition.

Marijuana PROHIBITION causes thousand fold more deaths than marijuana.

Their blood is on your beak, birdbrained liar....



.


Since marijuana itself is so non-toxic that it kills nobody, what they are now doing is blaming all traffic fatalities on marijuana when it is discovered in the autopsy. Is that science? No. That is not proof of what caused the accident.

The other driver
A ringing cellphone
Bad road conditions
Driver has bad eyes and should not have a license

Those are not considered because the objective is not science,it is to blame reefer without proving reefer was the cause.

If marijuana "impairs," how did josh Gordon catch all those passes in the NFL?

As with algore's fraud, the taxpayer pays liars to fudge studies to align the message with the cause.

All traffic accidents are now because of pot... Never mind the other driver was over the median line and the car driven by someone with marijuana in his system was 100% safe and legal when the other car hit it....


Just FOAD liar. You're propaganda ain't selling in the medical community. They've pulled bodies out of cars with 38 times the legal limit for THC, now why don't you lie again and tell us that's not enough for impairment. You're just a fucking joke like the other stoner.

.


If you drink 38 times the recommended dose of cough syrup, you likely are not fit to drive either. The decision to start your car and drive is your decision. You need to assess whether or not you are impaired. It is, of course, the jackasses who drive at 0.5 and wreck. That is not the fault of the majority of people who respsonsibly consume alcohol and know not to drive when impaired.

The difference,of course, is that Josh Gordon would not have 200 receiving yards and 3 TDs if he drank before the game. Instead, he toked, and proved to every sane human with an IQ over 5 that he was not impaired.

It is a tribute to just how relatively harmless marijuana is that your pathetically dishonest and hateful side has to stoop to 38 times the normal dose to document impairment.....

You never get to 38 times on alcohol, because at 10 times, you die...


Your anecdotal bullshit is just that, bullshit. If you want the damn law changed, get off your damn stoner ass and get it change. But stop whining like a 3 year old wanting more candy till you do. BTW, don't bother to reply, I won't be bumping your lame assed thread again.

.
 
A conservative, at least when that word had a real definition, meant being inherently against expanding government power and authority. Conservatism embraces freedom and privacy, and only real threat to others would justify changing and supporting increasing government at the expense of freedom and privacy.

You work a full day. You come home

You have a beer

Or

You have a bong hit


Neither activity would in any way bother a conservative. But here we are with self proclaimed "conservatives" embracing increased government power and authority at the expense of freedom and privacy over ... A plant.

Nice.


The origin of marijuana prohibition is a case study of the truth of conservatism, that big government should not be trusted, and that those in government will lie and spread fear and panic to keep themselves in power. The head of prohibition knew prohibition was going to be repealed (because the church going sub human morons who pushed it had no clue what they were doing, and in the end the American people figured out that al Capone was worse than alcohol). So this guy created a new issue, a new cause, to keep his job and title and budget etc. marijuana was the target. Using American taxdollars, this uber greedy kleptocratic traitor funded the making of mass misinfo about marijuana, most famously the movie Reefer Madness, which many morons still believe. In reality, by pushing marijuana underground, we enriched and empowered criminal elements here and abroad, and packed our prisons with people who are not a threat to society.

The war on marijuana is the epitome of BIG GOVERNMENT using lies, falsehoods, propaganda, and the law to do unreal harm to America and abroad for the sole purpose of enriching and empowering liars in government.

Nobody who opposes total marijuana legalization is in any way a conservative.

The pot haters are classic morons with bird brains filled with falsehoods who want big government to rescue them from the bogeyman.....
Just make sure warnings come with usage.
And imprison anyone who subjects another to their pot use while in public or involving another’s property…




At some point, just parroting these endless taxpayer funded fear pieces should succumb to the actual lives you observe.

Mick Jagger - major life long marijuana user - singing and dancing in his late 70s.... Major talent.
Willie Nelson - well, can't dance but the rest is the same
Michael phelps - world's greatest ever swimmer, bong user.
Josh Gordon - played NFL WR at HOF level while consuming marijuana regularly


Government lies.

It lies to scare people out of rights and wealth and freedom.

Marijuana is exhibit A of that truth

Do some unbiased research into marijuana, don't just look for what you are desperate to find.

Yeah, what can go wrong with a little marijuana use?

Drugs-S.gif


You did a reefer madness there.

Post the marijuana death stats..

Lol


There aren't any. You just posted a photo of someone in serious condition.

Marijuana PROHIBITION causes thousand fold more deaths than marijuana.

Their blood is on your beak, birdbrained liar....



.


Since marijuana itself is so non-toxic that it kills nobody, what they are now doing is blaming all traffic fatalities on marijuana when it is discovered in the autopsy. Is that science? No. That is not proof of what caused the accident.

The other driver
A ringing cellphone
Bad road conditions
Driver has bad eyes and should not have a license

Those are not considered because the objective is not science,it is to blame reefer without proving reefer was the cause.

If marijuana "impairs," how did josh Gordon catch all those passes in the NFL?

As with algore's fraud, the taxpayer pays liars to fudge studies to align the message with the cause.

All traffic accidents are now because of pot... Never mind the other driver was over the median line and the car driven by someone with marijuana in his system was 100% safe and legal when the other car hit it....


Just FOAD liar. You're propaganda ain't selling in the medical community. They've pulled bodies out of cars with 38 times the legal limit for THC, now why don't you lie again and tell us that's not enough for impairment. You're just a fucking joke like the other stoner.

.


If you drink 38 times the recommended dose of cough syrup, you likely are not fit to drive either. The decision to start your car and drive is your decision. You need to assess whether or not you are impaired. It is, of course, the jackasses who drive at 0.5 and wreck. That is not the fault of the majority of people who respsonsibly consume alcohol and know not to drive when impaired.

The difference,of course, is that Josh Gordon would not have 200 receiving yards and 3 TDs if he drank before the game. Instead, he toked, and proved to every sane human with an IQ over 5 that he was not impaired.

It is a tribute to just how relatively harmless marijuana is that your pathetically dishonest and hateful side has to stoop to 38 times the normal dose to document impairment.....

You never get to 38 times on alcohol, because at 10 times, you die...

If marijuana did not interfere with Josh Gordon's playing football, why is he not playing today?

How long before a game would he get stoned? If not long, just think how much better he'd have played and he'd still be playing.

Yes, I see your point now. Marijuana obviously had no influence on his career.

Got it!
 
I love it that I've gotten so deeply under your immature skin. What you can't seem to separate my opinion of what SHOULD BE and my opinion on the unequal application of what IS. I could explain it to a rational, more mature person, but you ain't that person. So just fire up your bong and enjoy your live in lala land.

You don't get under my skin and the reason you won't explain the hypocrisy is because you can't. You're not a conservative, you're not a constitutionalist; you're simply, yet another, authoritarian trying to force your will without regard to the Constitution. You're more like Biden/Harris, Obama/Biden, than you are willing to admit to yourself.


Is that really the best you got? You can scream all day that you want to toke up and anyone that doesn't buy your BS is un-American, and ya know what that will get ya, LAUGHS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:laughing0301: :21: :abgg2q.jpg: :laugh:

.
Really? You're persisting on your claim that the Commerce Clause empowers the Federal Government to ban the use of marijuana? And you call yourself a constitutionalist? Answer the fucking question or go away, hypocrite.
 
Your anecdotal bullshit is just that, bullshit. If you want the damn law changed, get off your damn stoner ass and get it change. But stop whining like a 3 year old wanting more candy till you do. BTW, don't bother to reply, I won't be bumping your lame assed thread again.

You've totally dropped any pretense of supporting the Constitution on this one, haven't you, hypocrite?
 

Once again, an anti-constitutional response. If traffic accidents are up for marijuana use, arrest the drivers. Punish the crime, not the tool. Do we ban hammers because they kill more people every year than do rifles? No; we arrest people who kill. Hypocrite.

We don't ban everything that can cause harm to oneself or to others. We punish criminals and we hold people accountable for their actions, not their possessions - at least that's how it used to be for the first 140 years of our nation and for the first 100000 years of humanity, hypocrite.
 
A conservative, at least when that word had a real definition, meant being inherently against expanding government power and authority. Conservatism embraces freedom and privacy, and only real threat to others would justify changing and supporting increasing government at the expense of freedom and privacy.

You work a full day. You come home

You have a beer

Or

You have a bong hit


Neither activity would in any way bother a conservative. But here we are with self proclaimed "conservatives" embracing increased government power and authority at the expense of freedom and privacy over ... A plant.

Nice.


The origin of marijuana prohibition is a case study of the truth of conservatism, that big government should not be trusted, and that those in government will lie and spread fear and panic to keep themselves in power. The head of prohibition knew prohibition was going to be repealed (because the church going sub human morons who pushed it had no clue what they were doing, and in the end the American people figured out that al Capone was worse than alcohol). So this guy created a new issue, a new cause, to keep his job and title and budget etc. marijuana was the target. Using American taxdollars, this uber greedy kleptocratic traitor funded the making of mass misinfo about marijuana, most famously the movie Reefer Madness, which many morons still believe. In reality, by pushing marijuana underground, we enriched and empowered criminal elements here and abroad, and packed our prisons with people who are not a threat to society.

The war on marijuana is the epitome of BIG GOVERNMENT using lies, falsehoods, propaganda, and the law to do unreal harm to America and abroad for the sole purpose of enriching and empowering liars in government.

Nobody who opposes total marijuana legalization is in any way a conservative.

The pot haters are classic morons with bird brains filled with falsehoods who want big government to rescue them from the bogeyman.....
Just make sure warnings come with usage.
And imprison anyone who subjects another to their pot use while in public or involving another’s property…




At some point, just parroting these endless taxpayer funded fear pieces should succumb to the actual lives you observe.

Mick Jagger - major life long marijuana user - singing and dancing in his late 70s.... Major talent.
Willie Nelson - well, can't dance but the rest is the same
Michael phelps - world's greatest ever swimmer, bong user.
Josh Gordon - played NFL WR at HOF level while consuming marijuana regularly


Government lies.

It lies to scare people out of rights and wealth and freedom.

Marijuana is exhibit A of that truth

Do some unbiased research into marijuana, don't just look for what you are desperate to find.

Yeah, what can go wrong with a little marijuana use?

Drugs-S.gif


You did a reefer madness there.

Post the marijuana death stats..

Lol


There aren't any. You just posted a photo of someone in serious condition.

Marijuana PROHIBITION causes thousand fold more deaths than marijuana.

Their blood is on your beak, birdbrained liar....



.


Since marijuana itself is so non-toxic that it kills nobody, what they are now doing is blaming all traffic fatalities on marijuana when it is discovered in the autopsy. Is that science? No. That is not proof of what caused the accident.

The other driver
A ringing cellphone
Bad road conditions
Driver has bad eyes and should not have a license

Those are not considered because the objective is not science,it is to blame reefer without proving reefer was the cause.

If marijuana "impairs," how did josh Gordon catch all those passes in the NFL?

As with algore's fraud, the taxpayer pays liars to fudge studies to align the message with the cause.

All traffic accidents are now because of pot... Never mind the other driver was over the median line and the car driven by someone with marijuana in his system was 100% safe and legal when the other car hit it....


Just FOAD liar. You're propaganda ain't selling in the medical community. They've pulled bodies out of cars with 38 times the legal limit for THC, now why don't you lie again and tell us that's not enough for impairment. You're just a fucking joke like the other stoner.

.


If you drink 38 times the recommended dose of cough syrup, you likely are not fit to drive either. The decision to start your car and drive is your decision. You need to assess whether or not you are impaired. It is, of course, the jackasses who drive at 0.5 and wreck. That is not the fault of the majority of people who respsonsibly consume alcohol and know not to drive when impaired.

The difference,of course, is that Josh Gordon would not have 200 receiving yards and 3 TDs if he drank before the game. Instead, he toked, and proved to every sane human with an IQ over 5 that he was not impaired.

It is a tribute to just how relatively harmless marijuana is that your pathetically dishonest and hateful side has to stoop to 38 times the normal dose to document impairment.....

You never get to 38 times on alcohol, because at 10 times, you die...

If marijuana did not interfere with Josh Gordon's playing football, why is he not playing today?

How long before a game would he get stoned? If not long, just think how much better he'd have played and he'd still be playing.

Yes, I see your point now. Marijuana obviously had no influence on his career.

Got it!

Josh Gordon's dominant years were early in his career when he was healthy and young. Gordon came out in the Supplemental Draft because he kept failing Baylor reefer tests. Did the same in the NFL. When he got on the field, he dominated.

He is reinstated again, but he is old, injured, and taking more than reefer for his pain, a typical ending of an NFL career.

No question he would be canton bound if the NFL had not suspended him as a brown for reefer only.

Don't know when he toked, but to argue he would be "better" is the same BS with Michael phelps. There is no evidence of that other than pot haters insisting bullshit is true because they are the beaked birdbrains parroting it.

Josh Gordon and Michael phelps were both THE BEST.

And pot haters HATE that truth....
 
I love it that I've gotten so deeply under your immature skin. What you can't seem to separate my opinion of what SHOULD BE and my opinion on the unequal application of what IS. I could explain it to a rational, more mature person, but you ain't that person. So just fire up your bong and enjoy your live in lala land.

You don't get under my skin and the reason you won't explain the hypocrisy is because you can't. You're not a conservative, you're not a constitutionalist; you're simply, yet another, authoritarian trying to force your will without regard to the Constitution. You're more like Biden/Harris, Obama/Biden, than you are willing to admit to yourself.


Is that really the best you got? You can scream all day that you want to toke up and anyone that doesn't buy your BS is un-American, and ya know what that will get ya, LAUGHS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:laughing0301: :21: :abgg2q.jpg: :laugh:

.
Really? You're persisting on your claim that the Commerce Clause empowers the Federal Government to ban the use of marijuana? And you call yourself a constitutionalist? Answer the fucking question or go away, hypocrite.


It was all about Adenauer knowing he would be terminated when prohibition was going to be repealed, and demonizing pot with tax dollars was his chance to keep his taxpayer funded job, power, and importance.

Adenauer never dreamed America had so many parroting morons who would take the reefer madness bullshit as gospel truth....
 
You called yourself a "conservative" not a Conservative.

The former has no relation to the latter except in spelling.

Explain the difference.
Conservatives know the difference.
"conservatives" do not have sufficient self awareness to comprehend the conflict between their day to day words and actions and the Ideology they purport to be supporting.

I'm conservative and I don't know the difference - because there's no such thing as a Conservative. There are republicans and Republicans and there are democrats and Democrats. But the problem is, there's no group that has the proper name of Conservative. If you know of one, then quit avoiding answering the question and tell us.
The exact answer one expects from a "conservative."
He doesn't know a thing about Conservatives so he conflates them with other groups.
There used to be Conservative, Moderate, and Liberal Democrats and Republicans.
There has not been a Conservative president since Gerald Ford.
Harry Truman would have been the last Democratic Conservative to be President.
Following the Southern Plan
Republicans recruited Democrats unhappy with the Liberalism of the Democratic party toward race.
Then the anti-abortion crowd, anti-vax, anti-science, gunners and thus the growing stupification and dishonesty of the GOP.
These people have no idea of what Republican philosophy is but they call themselves "conservative" so the GOP became conflated with political stupidity.
Your doing

BUT

If you don't know why MTG and BoBo are not Conservatives that, my tiny brained "conservative" is entirely on you.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
A conservative, at least when that word had a real definition, meant being inherently against expanding government power and authority. Conservatism embraces freedom and privacy, and only real threat to others would justify changing and supporting increasing government at the expense of freedom and privacy.

You work a full day. You come home

You have a beer

Or

You have a bong hit


Neither activity would in any way bother a conservative. But here we are with self proclaimed "conservatives" embracing increased government power and authority at the expense of freedom and privacy over ... A plant.

Nice.


The origin of marijuana prohibition is a case study of the truth of conservatism, that big government should not be trusted, and that those in government will lie and spread fear and panic to keep themselves in power. The head of prohibition knew prohibition was going to be repealed (because the church going sub human morons who pushed it had no clue what they were doing, and in the end the American people figured out that al Capone was worse than alcohol). So this guy created a new issue, a new cause, to keep his job and title and budget etc. marijuana was the target. Using American taxdollars, this uber greedy kleptocratic traitor funded the making of mass misinfo about marijuana, most famously the movie Reefer Madness, which many morons still believe. In reality, by pushing marijuana underground, we enriched and empowered criminal elements here and abroad, and packed our prisons with people who are not a threat to society.

The war on marijuana is the epitome of BIG GOVERNMENT using lies, falsehoods, propaganda, and the law to do unreal harm to America and abroad for the sole purpose of enriching and empowering liars in government.

Nobody who opposes total marijuana legalization is in any way a conservative.

The pot haters are classic morons with bird brains filled with falsehoods who want big government to rescue them from the bogeyman.....
Just make sure warnings come with usage.
And imprison anyone who subjects another to their pot use while in public or involving another’s property…




At some point, just parroting these endless taxpayer funded fear pieces should succumb to the actual lives you observe.

Mick Jagger - major life long marijuana user - singing and dancing in his late 70s.... Major talent.
Willie Nelson - well, can't dance but the rest is the same
Michael phelps - world's greatest ever swimmer, bong user.
Josh Gordon - played NFL WR at HOF level while consuming marijuana regularly


Government lies.

It lies to scare people out of rights and wealth and freedom.

Marijuana is exhibit A of that truth

Do some unbiased research into marijuana, don't just look for what you are desperate to find.

Yeah, what can go wrong with a little marijuana use?

Drugs-S.gif


You did a reefer madness there.

Post the marijuana death stats..

Lol


There aren't any. You just posted a photo of someone in serious condition.

Marijuana PROHIBITION causes thousand fold more deaths than marijuana.

Their blood is on your beak, birdbrained liar....



.


Since marijuana itself is so non-toxic that it kills nobody, what they are now doing is blaming all traffic fatalities on marijuana when it is discovered in the autopsy. Is that science? No. That is not proof of what caused the accident.

The other driver
A ringing cellphone
Bad road conditions
Driver has bad eyes and should not have a license

Those are not considered because the objective is not science,it is to blame reefer without proving reefer was the cause.

If marijuana "impairs," how did josh Gordon catch all those passes in the NFL?

As with algore's fraud, the taxpayer pays liars to fudge studies to align the message with the cause.

All traffic accidents are now because of pot... Never mind the other driver was over the median line and the car driven by someone with marijuana in his system was 100% safe and legal when the other car hit it....


Just FOAD liar. You're propaganda ain't selling in the medical community. They've pulled bodies out of cars with 38 times the legal limit for THC, now why don't you lie again and tell us that's not enough for impairment. You're just a fucking joke like the other stoner.

.


If you drink 38 times the recommended dose of cough syrup, you likely are not fit to drive either. The decision to start your car and drive is your decision. You need to assess whether or not you are impaired. It is, of course, the jackasses who drive at 0.5 and wreck. That is not the fault of the majority of people who respsonsibly consume alcohol and know not to drive when impaired.

The difference,of course, is that Josh Gordon would not have 200 receiving yards and 3 TDs if he drank before the game. Instead, he toked, and proved to every sane human with an IQ over 5 that he was not impaired.

It is a tribute to just how relatively harmless marijuana is that your pathetically dishonest and hateful side has to stoop to 38 times the normal dose to document impairment.....

You never get to 38 times on alcohol, because at 10 times, you die...

If marijuana did not interfere with Josh Gordon's playing football, why is he not playing today?

How long before a game would he get stoned? If not long, just think how much better he'd have played and he'd still be playing.

Yes, I see your point now. Marijuana obviously had no influence on his career.

Got it!

Josh Gordon's dominant years were early in his career when he was healthy and young. Gordon came out in the Supplemental Draft because he kept failing Baylor reefer tests. Did the same in the NFL. When he got on the field, he dominated.

He is reinstated again, but he is old, injured, and taking more than reefer for his pain, a typical ending of an NFL career.

No question he would be canton bound if the NFL had not suspended him as a brown for reefer only.

Don't know when he toked, but to argue he would be "better" is the same BS with Michael phelps. There is no evidence of that other than pot haters insisting bullshit is true because they are the beaked birdbrains parroting it.

Josh Gordon and Michael phelps were both THE BEST.

And pot haters HATE that truth....
I don't agree with punishing athletes for pot use.
BUT
As the President says "rulz is da rulz!"
or words to that effect.
If someone's paying you a couple of million a year and the rules say "no pot"
For Jimminy's sake, NO POT!
Get drunk, have some absenthe but NO EFFIN POT!

Gordon was amazing.
If he were in shape and got lots of practice he could be a #2/#3 on most teams today.

Totally in favor of full legalization, tax it and use the proceeds for drug treatment.
But rulz is, in fact, rulsz.
 

Forum List

Back
Top