- Thread starter
- #561
You haven't mastered the art of critical thinking. That much is certain.Your proof doesn’t exist fir one reason, it doesn’t exist.Our evidence?Dear Loonie RightyCoyote is a looney lefty that can’t face reality."Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?" You are either blind or real stupid.Why are you claiming anyone is trying to overturn the election? If rampant fraud was found, it won’t undo the election, especially the Presidential one. It will just enable the people to see who broke the law and what laws need to be changed to make the elections cleaner and more transparent.
Only to Republicans trying to overthrow democracy.
Actually, we are a Republic. The word 'democracy' doesn't appear in the Constitution.
Actually that's mostly semantics in this context, but that's the game you like to play. We have a democratic form of government it's just not a straight out democracy.
Why does the idea of a representative form of government, such as ours, upset you so much you are scrambling to overturn it?
Why are you against transparent elections?
Why are you claiming they weren't trying to overturn an election? They picked 1/6 at the Capitol out of a hat? Really?
Why - in absence of any evidence - do you insist on audit after audit? This is number 3 or 4 for Arizona isn't it?
So you in absence of evidence you just insist on more. That's when you leave rational behavior behind and enter whackadoodle territory.
Rational behavior - we have a system for contesting that has endured for several centuries - we can request recounts, we can send to the courts, we can have the DoJ look for frauds - all of which have applied. And no evidence of significant fraud.
At point will you be satisfied? Rhetorical question. You won't be. Because that's the way conspiracy theories work (or sore losers who can't admit their guy was so crappy he lost to an opponent portrayed as an old geezer). So now, as each level of investigation FAILS to produce evidence of fraud - the investigators and officials themselves are then incorporated into the conspiracy theory - they are "in on the fraud". That's why your reduced to a crackpot group with no experience in election fraud, looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots.
And billing the taxpayers for your crap! All because your leader refuses to admit that He. Is. A. Loser.
The American people are the ones who are paying for this.
Absence of evidence? This isn’t looney liberal world, this is the real world where there is plenty of evidence. Repeating “dEbUnKeD” as many times as you want, it doesn’t change the evidence that is there.
What you call "looney" is requiring substantiation.
If your "evidence" constantly FAILS to clear the bar through commonly accepted means - then it's false.
You guys have every right to create your own alternative realities, but don't expect us to join you.
Thanks.
Loonie Leftie
The only evidence that has been presented in court was rejected because of one reason....lack of merit.
Do you understand that?
It means that no state has been able to complete a full audit of the votes yet. Arizona is the only state that is in the process of doing so....and the Democrats have thrown every legal trick in the book at them.
Why are they so afraid of discovery?
A judge cannot entertain a lawsuit unless the state has proven the claims of the plaintiff. They knew this going in.....so this is why they pulled this fraud. They knew it would take months or even years for the courts to work it out.
The Supreme Court could have issued a stay on the certification until the evidence was reviewed fully, but elected not to...thanks to Chief Justice Roberts owing a favor to the Bush family.